JEA's Greenland Energy Center coming to the Southside

Started by Metro Jacksonville, July 09, 2008, 05:00:00 AM

thelakelander

Quote5,530 acres of solar panels to produce the 553 MW that JEA's new plant will produce.

That could be a problem.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

BridgeTroll

This reality makes solar a complement to traditional electricity generation, not a replacement.  Seems more suited for individual homes, businesses, or governments.  Seems to me that wind power would fall into the same category.  Large tracts of land covered in windmills to generate the same power as a traditional plant.
In a boat at sea one of the men began to bore a hole in the bottom of the boat. On being remonstrating with, he answered, "I am only boring under my own seat." "Yes," said his companions, "but when the sea rushes in we shall all be drowned with you."

Jason

Exactly.  On a small scale solar make a lot of sence but on a power company scale, not so much.

Note that there are other technologies out there that are more compact or use the solar radiation to generate a steam driven turbine and can take up less space, however, they still require vast amounts of land and are more expensive to implement and maintain.

Doctor_K

Agree.  

This discussion makes me start to wonder, though, how much the technology of both PV/Solar and Wind will advance and evolve in the next 20 years or so.  Makes me excited to see what's coming next!
"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create."  -- Albert Einstein

Jason

The technology is there, it just needs to be implemented.  I've seen gobs of shows on Discovery, TLC, and History channels touting gobs of revolutionary new technologies.  It just takes tons of money and tons of time to get them out of the lab an into mass use.

When you get a free moment just try Googling "solar technology" or "future energy".  You'll be amazed.

BridgeTroll

No doubt the technology is there but it still is not cost effective enough nor is it efficient enough to replace conventional sources.  Coal, oil, and gas will continue for the forseeable future to be the generator of choice for the vast majority of humans on this planet...
In a boat at sea one of the men began to bore a hole in the bottom of the boat. On being remonstrating with, he answered, "I am only boring under my own seat." "Yes," said his companions, "but when the sea rushes in we shall all be drowned with you."

bde269

i want to work there and be part of the start up crew i work at a 550 mw combine cycle plant and want to be down south

NotNow

There should be state and federal tax credits to reimburse at least 75% cost of a typical residential or small business installation.  A four to eight panel system with batteries and inverter to supply at least 75% of electricity used.  Same for the "plug in" electric car.  This is where "stimulus" money should be spent.  This would IMMEDIATLY reduce the need for foreign oil, create jobs and stimulate research and competition in this field.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

mtraininjax

With so much coal available, it seems silly not to use it, or Nuclear over more difficult to reach natural gas. Anyone heard about Peak oil reserves being reached? All the easy energy has been found, newer deposits (oil and nat gas) will require more drilling and more expenses.

Again, coal is easier to find, we know where it is and to mine it as well. If we can spend 3 trillion bucks in Iraq, we can figure out ways to clean coal emissions.
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

"This is a game-changer. This is what I mean when I say taking Jacksonville to the next level."
-Mayor Alvin Brown on new video boards at Everbank Field

Lunican

QuoteJEA power plant project moves forward
Two natural gas-powered turbines to cost $205 million

The recession pushed back building plans for the Greenland Energy Center, but now the Jacksonville power project is moving forward with a cheaper price tag.

Two natural gas-powered combustion turbines, each able to generate 177 megawatts, will cost JEA $205 million â€" about $45 million below previous estimates, the city-owned utility said last week.
Full article:
http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-06-22/story/jea_power_plant_project_moves_forward

Jason

In the short term, this is good news that the plant is moving forward because it will add redundancy and flexibility to the grid.  The bad news is that the sole reason this plant is necessary is because of the sprawl that has taken place in southern Duval and northern St. Johns.  This plant will only aid future development, IMO.

Still, we should brace for a likely rate hike.  JEA should still be at the lower end when compared to other utilities, but not as low as they are today.

copperfiend

They closed the driving range too early. It is sitting there rotting. Damn you JEA!!!

Ocklawaha

In Oklahoma and Texas alone, there must be 6000 torches burning off the NG from the well fields. One would think we'd be looking for a way to capture ALL of it for use. Any JEA types on here know if they'll capture the exhust heat for a steam turbine?

As for the Coal Quesiton, I'm all for it if we could burn Anthracite (clean) coal. Otherwise, we'd need to build the plant in Hilliard or maybe Kings Bay.


OCKLAWAHA

reednavy

JEA has espressed possible nuclear power in the future. I'd expect that plant to be built probably along the St. Mary's River in Baker County or Charlton County, GA.
Jacksonville: We're not vertically challenged, just horizontally gifted!

Traveller

With all the timber located in and around the First Coast region, I wonder whether JEA has considered cellulosic biomass as a fuel source.