MOUNT MORIAH MOVES ON aka demolished by Miles Development

Started by brooklyn-ite, August 20, 2007, 05:27:32 PM

brooklyn-ite

http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/082007/met_192817440.shtml

just sad ..... plain sad .....  I bet Moriah got raped on the price Miles gave them too .....

everyone in Brooklyn is gonna have to go soon between this Project and their eminent domain 'guise thru the city.

thelakelander

At 110 years old, Mount Moriah was once of Jacksonville's oldest buildings and one of a handful that existed before the Great Fire of 1901.  It would have been great if that old building could have been moved or became a part of the site, similar to the Church of the Holy Trinity, which was preserved during the construction of Toronto's Easton Centre.

QuoteThe church is located at 10 Trinity Square, next to the west side of the Toronto Eaton Centre. The original Eaton Centre construction plans called for the church to be demolished as well, but the parishioners successfully resisted and forced the mall's design to be changed



It would be nice to see the JEDC treat the community of Brooklyn with a little more respect and actually try to save a few of the neighborhood's significant structures instead of completely white washing it.



"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Seraphs

While redeveloping Brooklyn is important it seems to me someone would have vision to preserve these old structures.  Apprantly, the historic society doesn't deem this as necessary.

lindab

To the defense of the historic commission - they are besieged by big money real estate and government entities who want to tear stuff down to get open ground for their projects. A nasty form of in-fill.

It would be great if there was a dedicated fund for moving and restoring historic buildings when there is no other recourse. It could take exist like a mitigation fund paid for by new development.

vicupstate

Quote from: lindab on August 21, 2007, 08:28:32 AM
To the defense of the historic commission - they are besieged by big money real estate and government entities who want to tear stuff down to get open ground for their projects. A nasty form of in-fill.

It would be great if there was a dedicated fund for moving and restoring historic buildings when there is no other recourse. It could take exist like a mitigation fund paid for by new development.


I don't understand your 'defense' comment.  Isn't the purpose of the Historic Commission to prevent those same entitites from destroying history? 

When Matt Carlucci was Council president, there was a fund set up just for the purpose you describe.  Eventually the funds were parceled  out and additional funds were not added.  It needs a dedicated revenue source, as you described.   
"The problem with quotes on the internet is you can never be certain they're authentic." - Abraham Lincoln