Developer proposes 13-story Southbank apartment tower

Started by Metro Jacksonville, January 18, 2017, 07:50:01 AM

Tacachale

^It was pie in the sky even before the real estate bubble burst. The current project is much more feasible.
Do you believe that when the blue jay or another bird sings and the body is trembling, that is a signal that people are coming or something important is about to happen?

billy

I think around this period there were three planned Arquitectonica designed residential high rises planned for both sides of the St. Johns.
The other two were at the Shipyards.

thelakelander

DDRB sided with the apartment developer. The owner of the Aetna Building (or whatever it's called now) plans to file a suit to keep the apartment project from happening. They don't want the building to be taller than 60' even though a 45 story building had the green light to be built in the same location before the real estate bust killed it.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

MusicMan

How long do they have to file? Or how soon can construction begin?

FlaBoy

Quote from: MusicMan on December 13, 2017, 09:57:41 AM
How long do they have to file? Or how soon can construction begin?

If its an injunction they are looking for, they need to file ASAP but have a two year period. It is an almost certainly fruitless lawsuit.

edjax

Quote from: FlaBoy on December 13, 2017, 01:00:25 PM
Quote from: MusicMan on December 13, 2017, 09:57:41 AM
How long do they have to file? Or how soon can construction begin?

If its an injunction they are looking for, they need to file ASAP but have a two year period. It is an almost certainly fruitless lawsuit.

Agree it seems worthless to attempt.  Let's see they bought it in 2013 and one would think during their due diligence they were very aware of the previously approved project on the same tract of land.  So they felt they got such a good deal it was worth the risk.  Also did they make any attempt to purchase this land to protect their investment?  If not I would throw the suit out.

acme54321

Anyone know what was mentioned about this project at the DIA meeting?

KenFSU

^Just that the owners and neighbors have come to an agreement that cut the 300-unit $65 million project down to 180-units at $45 million. DIA is on board with the requested $8 million, 20-year REV grant.

acme54321

Cool, I was curious if they had released any renderings.

jcjohnpaint

There was about a year ago, but I don't know if it will be 13 fls anymore.

acme54321

Yeah, I've seen those.  I'd say it wasn't exactly an awe inspiring building.  I'm hoping that this new building will be a little more interesting architecturally rather than just downsizing what had been proposed.  We can dream ::)

bl8jaxnative


acme54321

Quote from: bl8jaxnative on October 03, 2018, 04:42:44 PM
Where exactly is this proposed for?

The surface lot between the Aetna building and Acosta bridge.

howfam

Quote from: acme54321 on September 24, 2018, 08:03:16 AM
Yeah, I've seen those.  I'd say it wasn't exactly an awe inspiring building.  I'm hoping that this new building will be a little more interesting architecturally rather than just downsizing what had been proposed.  We can dream ::)


I hope it's not another 5-story frame building on our downtown waterfront. Embarrassing!!

KenFSU

^Counterpoints.

1) Metro Houston has 6.5 million people living in an area smaller than Jacksonville. Makes sense that they'd have more, bigger skyscrapers than a metro of 1.5 million spread over a larger land area. You build up when a shortage of land makes building out more expensive.

2) Demand for residential units and office space in downtown Jacksonville is finite. If there's demand for 1,000 apartments, you've got to chose between height and density. Personally, I'd rather have ten 5-story apartment buildings going up and providing some infill than one 50-story highrise.

3) If you compare our skyline to that of comparable MSAs, it's actually quite nice.