Winegardner & Hammons to Manage Laura Trio Marriott

Started by Metro Jacksonville, December 15, 2014, 10:20:02 PM

fieldafm

Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

edjax

Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

If a profitable offer on table for the City, then who is the issue?  DIA? if not, who with the city?

Houseboat Mike

Quote from: edjax on March 20, 2015, 10:13:03 PM
Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

If a profitable offer on table for the City, then who is the issue?  DIA? if not, who with the city?

Exactly my point. Who can I call? Who can I email? What is the status of this project? Why isn't there a central repository for all of this information? And if there is, what is it?

jcjohnpaint


strider

Not to worry, Municipal Code Compliance is on it and took one of these buildings (as well as the Claude Nolan) to Special Masters a couple of weeks ago.  I think they got another 180 days to get things done!
"My father says that almost the whole world is asleep. Everybody you know. Everybody you see. Everybody you talk to. He says that only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement." Patrica, Joe VS the Volcano.

fieldafm

Quote from: edjax on March 20, 2015, 10:13:03 PM
Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

If a profitable offer on table for the City, then who is the issue?  DIA? if not, who with the city?

Like with anything, the City would need to bond money to take on any new capital improvements.

fieldafm

Quote from: Houseboat Mike on March 20, 2015, 10:26:03 PM
Quote from: edjax on March 20, 2015, 10:13:03 PM
Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

If a profitable offer on table for the City, then who is the issue?  DIA? if not, who with the city?

Exactly my point. Who can I call? Who can I email? What is the status of this project? Why isn't there a central repository for all of this information? And if there is, what is it?

DIA and the Mayor's office.

Kay

Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

Then what is the problem?

fieldafm

Quote from: Kay on March 21, 2015, 08:03:43 AM
Quote from: fieldafm on March 20, 2015, 09:16:38 PM
Quote from: Kay on March 20, 2015, 09:08:09 PM
I think the lender is not going to lend the money without the City being responsible if project goes belly up.  Don't know that makes
sense for the City.  The DIA wants to see this project happen.

Sorry Kay, that's not entirely true. The City has a profitable offer on the table. At this point, I'm surprised the financial partner hasn't walked by now. I would have.
That's not the kind of message that the City should be sending to this type of lender (a very big player who has not invested in Jacksonville before).

Then what is the problem?

See my post above regarding debt.

thelakelander

Quote from: strider on March 21, 2015, 06:46:09 AM
Not to worry, Municipal Code Compliance is on it and took one of these buildings (as well as the Claude Nolan) to Special Masters a couple of weeks ago.  I think they got another 180 days to get things done!
What building is code eying?
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali