RAP OVERLAY & KICKBACKS

Started by Captain Zissou, February 28, 2012, 10:39:58 AM

Captain Zissou

This thread was split off from the 5-points Street Art Piece, OCKLAWAHA




Quote from: ChriswUfGator on February 28, 2012, 09:56:32 AM
They built the base for it and then never put the thing up. I don't think anyone knows WTF is up with it, it's been a year.

Wouldn't that be a good thing for RAP to fight for???  Beautifying the neighborhood...?  Oh right, they've got their hands full trying to shut down one of their most successful inhabitants. Nevermind

Kaiser Soze

#1
Quote from: Captain Zissou on February 28, 2012, 10:39:58 AM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on February 28, 2012, 09:56:32 AM
They built the base for it and then never put the thing up. I don't think anyone knows WTF is up with it, it's been a year.

Wouldn't that be a good thing for RAP to fight for???  Beautifying the neighborhood...?  Oh right, they've got their hands full trying to shut down one of their most successful inhabitants. Nevermind
Funny.  I thought RAP was a group concerned with historic preservation.  Was not aware that its was a group of planners and traffic engineers.

Dog Walker

#2
Quote from: Captain Zissou on February 28, 2012, 10:39:58 AM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on February 28, 2012, 09:56:32 AM
They built the base for it and then never put the thing up. I don't think anyone knows WTF is up with it, it's been a year.

Wouldn't that be a good thing for RAP to fight for???  Beautifying the neighborhood...?  Oh right, they've got their hands full trying to shut down one of their most successful inhabitants. Nevermind

Come on, Captain!  Cheap shot and not true.  They are not trying to shut down Kickbacks, they just don't think something larger than the Cheesecake Factory at the Town Center is appropriate for the neighborhood.
When all else fails hug the dog.

Dog Walker

#3
400+ seats ain't small, Stephen and is too big for the 'hood.  We should be writing  this on the other thread.  Captain hijacked it, so I had to reply here.  Nuf said here.
When all else fails hug the dog.

ben says

#4
I don't get the whole "too many seats" argument.

Who gives a f*ck.

Bring on 800, 1600, 3200 seats. Jesus christ...for once we have an establishment bringing people in by the bucket load, and everyone freaks out. Isn't that what successful neighborhoods/businesses do?????

I lived in Charleston, a city where EVERYONE, rich, poor, condo, mansion, studio, flat parked on the street. Good, vibrant cities (san fran is another one that comes to mind) have tons of street parking, sometimes at the expense of home owners. When you have ground level population, using the streets, that's what happens. Is that really so awful? feels like a fair tradeoff to me. I'd rather have to fight to get a spot in front of my house and risk parking a few blocks away than EVER drive into that hell-hole they call the Town center.
For luxury travel agency & concierge services, reach out at jax2bcn@gmail.com - my blog about life in Barcelona can be found at www.lifeinbarcelona.com (under construction!)

ben says

#5
Not to mention...

let's give RAP the benefit of the doubt. They want to maintain "historic preservation." Is Kickbacks REALLY preventing that???? Not sure what's going on here, but the whole thing stinks.

Sorry for the rants.
For luxury travel agency & concierge services, reach out at jax2bcn@gmail.com - my blog about life in Barcelona can be found at www.lifeinbarcelona.com (under construction!)

Kaiser Soze

#6
Far more restaurant seats at the shops in Avondale.  People park all over the place.  Avondale routinely cited as one of the great historic areas in the southeast.  Go figure.

mtraininjax

#7
QuoteThey want to maintain "historic preservation."

That is 100% absolute horse hockey! RAP wants to maintain control, they are control zealots who think they have the power over what anyone in the Riverside/Avondale district can and should do to renovate or change buildings. In fact, they have the absolute power over the Historic part of planning by making people fill out Certificates of Appropriateness, just so they can approve or deny changes or renovations.

RAP is all about not allowing change, unless it is THEIR kind of change. They fear anyone who wants to make any changes that do not fit within their strict confines of THEIR change. That "building" that Kickbacks wants to tear down has 0% Historic value, its a dump, and if it was historic, Code Enforcement, the submissive group that RAP uses to enforce their will, would have shut down the owners for the numerous violations, but alas they have not and Code Enforcement does nothing still, because RAP has a bigger score to settle with Kickbacks.

RAP would shut down Avondale if they could, I'd love to see every store setup as a restaurant just to burn their candles at both ends. Let the people park from St. Johns to 17 on every available street. It is URBAN living, if you don't like Nocatee is looking for deadwood.
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

"This is a game-changer. This is what I mean when I say taking Jacksonville to the next level."
-Mayor Alvin Brown on new video boards at Everbank Field

tufsu1

#8
historic districts all over the country have additional controls beyond what non-historic areas do....yielding some assurance that the district will maintain its look and feel....which is precisely why many homes in these historic areas increase in value more than other areas.

Riverside-Avondale is a great example of this in Jacksonville.

Kaiser Soze

#9
Quote from: tufsu1 on February 29, 2012, 08:02:29 AM
historic districts all over the country have additional controls beyond what non-historic areas do....yielding some assurance that the district will maintain its look and feel....
You are getting the historic preservation regulations contained within the ordinance code confused with RAP, which is merely an advisory organization with no authority.  RAP is trying to make itself into some sort of quasi-homeowners association.  No thanks.  Stick to what you know, which is historic preservation. 

Found this amusing from RAP's website:

QuoteIn the 1970s, a handful of residents watched with dismay as unique historical structures were left in disrepair or demolished before their eyes. These concerned citizens, led by Dr. Wayne Wood, decided to take action and formed Riverside Avondale Preservation in 1974 with the aim of preserving the unique scenic, cultural and historical atmosphere of the neighborhood.

I'd opine that RAP has swerved way off course.  If you want a homeowners association, move to the myriad of subdivisions around town.  The City already has added regulatory authority over the neighborhood, we don;t need RAP making it more difficult for local residents and businesses.

Captain Zissou

#10
The historic overlay is worthless, in my opinion.  I could have made it in 30 minutes if I had a decent map and some crayola markers.  All they did is take properties that had a house on them and designate them as residential parcels (no sh*t Sherlock), they took parcels with stores and called them commercial (holy cow!), and etc. for the other land uses.  There was no vision involved, no attention paid towards future growth of commercial districts or denser mixed use development in the commercial areas.  They just took what was already sitting in the dirt and said what it was and now what it shall be for the foreseeable future. So until the overlay expires, they have intentionally stagnated progress for the sake of preservation.

Debbie Thompson

#11
Before you go ranting on about the overlay and RAP, realize that an overlay and historic designation protects the neighborhood from wholesale destruction or bastardizing of historic buildings.  RAP doesn't control the process.  The LUZ committee and the City Council does.  But without the preservation advocacy, you could end up with people modernizing your commercial buildings and making them look like the god-awful pink stucco eyesore that is the old Claude Nolan Building on Main Street.  You can't even tell any longer that there is an incredible praire style building beneath those awful pink stucco panels that were added in the desire to "update" an old building. 

Oh...and I like the sculpture. It would be great to put an uplight in there and rotate art from willing artists.

avs

I dont have a foot on one side or the other of the kickbacks fight but I agree with Debbie.  An Historic Overlay isn't a comp plan.  It designates what is historic and gives a path to preserve that character.  If the neighborhood wants a development plan, that is another tool.

An uplight would be nice, but I think somewhere on the thread someone said it is there temporarily???

tufsu1

#13
Quote from: stephendare on February 29, 2012, 08:16:43 AM
No its not.  Im not sniping at you like normal, tufsu.  But this is a general misperception.  The evidence showing a link between home value and historic district zoning and regulation controls is tenuous at best.

And Riverside Avondale has only had an overlay giving some kind of control for two years.  The land values and the general quality of life improvements began long before.  Going on 40 years ago now.

sorry...guess my post came off as absolute...I was trying to say that the assurances provided by historic districts (be it an overlay, local designation, nation register, etc.) contribute greatly to the stability of the communities and their corresponding property value increase.

Kaiser Soze

#14
Quote from: Debbie Thompson on February 29, 2012, 12:39:33 PM
Before you go ranting on about the overlay and RAP, realize that an overlay and historic designation protects the neighborhood from wholesale destruction or bastardizing of historic buildings.  RAP doesn't control the process.  The LUZ committee and the City Council does.  But without the preservation advocacy, you could end up with people modernizing your commercial buildings and making them look like the god-awful pink stucco eyesore that is the old Claude Nolan Building on Main Street.  You can't even tell any longer that there is an incredible praire style building beneath those awful pink stucco panels that were added in the desire to "update" an old building. 

Oh...and I like the sculpture. It would be great to put an uplight in there and rotate art from willing artists.
I have no problem with the City.  For the most part, the City follows the regulations and makes exceptions were it is deemed necessary.

What I do have a problem with is RAP's attempt at broadening its mission statement.  RAP was founded to support historic preservation. It was not founded to hold the rest of the neighborhood hostage as it uses the overlay as a sword to attack expanding businesses. 

The problem is that our elected officials (at least some of them) believe that RAP speaks for all of us that live in the historic overlay.  RAP does not speak for the neighborhood.  It speaks for a small group of people that feel its their business to structure when and where development or re-vitalization occurs.   Again, if I wanted to be undre the thumb of an HOA, I would have moved to Nocatee or any number of other surburban areas.  Until the busybodies that comprise the RAP board stay the hell out of planning and stick to actual preservation, they will not see one red cent from this overlay zone resident.  I hope others do the same.