Help from the city of jacksonville to save historic homes

Started by samiam, February 07, 2010, 02:43:52 PM

samiam

The housing market, which we keep hearing is improving, is still not at the very bottom.  For instance, we hear about the Springfield market and that new buyers are coming in.  We need to not only say great, new buyers, but realize why they are here.  Great values now that the market has crashed.  Many are very low priced foreclosures.  I know one house that the couple who owned it did at least 120K worth of work and the house is now available about fives years later for under 60K. It may need some work, but it is a better value now that it was five or six years agobefore it got the work it needed then.


Yes plenty of good deals are to be had in Springfield. Most of the out of state investore with the business plan to sell there houses for a 100% profit without doing anything to the house have gone into forcloser and the hard money lenders are belly up as well. The best deals are for cash. One thing i wish is that the city of Jacksonville would realize this and set up an office to assist new home owners with doing the work themself and lay off code enforcement and inspector until the economy improves otherwise we will lose more of the valuable historic houses than we have in the past. Most of the work that is being done now is not though a bank but is out of pocket and the city needs to realize it will take a home owner a lot longer to restore there house under these conditions.


A program could be set up as a link between historic preservation and city code enforcement (so the left hand is talking to the right hand) with contractors on staff with expertise with historic structures, as to comply with building code.

samiam

This needs to be brought back

Historic Springfield Appearance/Façade Grant Program
The Historic Springfield Appearance/Façade grant program is designed to improve the aesthetic appearance and bring the exterior of historic structures in Springfield in compliance with applicable codes. Priority will be given to structures located in the primary target blocks and will be limited, at this time, to the southwest and southeast sections of the Springfield area.
Area boundaries are:
North â€" Eighth Street
East â€" Ionia/Clark Streets
South â€" Hogan’s Creek
West â€" Boulevard Street

sheclown

Sam, I agree with the first part of this statement, that code enforcement ought not to be pressured to condemn houses so quickly, but it was SPAR Council who pushed for this, so it has to begin at home.


samiam

The above is a program that was in place years ago, not only would it create jobs it would be an incentive for people to buy and save historic houses. there are many city's that still have programs like this still in place.

It would not make Springfield into a private community it will bring people in to buy or just see there history

sheclown

I know the facade program very well.  It did wonders for this neighborhood, generated interest by pumping in millions and millions of dollars.  

But even back then, the rest of the city complained about the "special treatment" that Springfield got -- and it was in terrible disrepair back then.  The purpose of this money was to bring property values up to a certain point which would allow the neighborhood to stand on its own.  I doubt that the city would be willing to do this again, but hey, I am a licensed restoration contractor and would love the business.


samiam

It should be handled by the city's historic preservation group. Not SPAR or SHARP or the Mommies group.

peestandingup

I agree, historic homes SHOULD have special treatment & be better protected. I mean, once they tear it down, thats it. Over a hundred years of history gone, and you can never get that back.

Its a shame the city doesnt work with individuals who just want to buy & restore a condemned property. Im not talking about a big investing firm who just wants to sit on the property forever either, which is counterproductive. I mean real individuals who are looking to make it their home one day. This is much healthier for the neighborhood.

It seems like to the city, a condemned property is a condemned property. I dont thinks thats quite fair when talking about historic districts. But to them, its business as usual. Be nice is there were a special program offered to get financed and also protect the home from the city bulldozers, while not slapping a bunch of fines & fees on the buyer. Are there any other cities who have something similar??

nvrenuf

Quote from: sheclown on February 07, 2010, 03:28:50 PM
But even back then, the rest of the city complained about the "special treatment" that Springfield got -- and it was in terrible disrepair back then.  

Seems only fair that Springfield would get this considering the "special treatment" the rest of the city was giving to Springfield for so many decades. Let "the others" complain. The pipes under most of our roads have been neglected since 1950ish I'm guessing, resulting in cave-ins and "crap there went my shocks again" streets, meanwhile other parts of town seem to be in a constant rotation of new pavement.

I'm irritated daily by this city's lack of ability to understand what they have in historic districts. Have ANY of the powers that be visited Charleston, Savannah or hell even St Augustine? The historic areas, handled properly, could bring in so much tourist money to pay for everything else in the city. What part of that don't they get?

fsu813

"Thats what all of us thought when we supported it.

However, you can read what it has become in the threads."


- a desirable, trendy, and ever-improving place to live?

nvrenuf

Good question, don't know. I'm too greedy wishing I could have gotten the facade grant. But alas.

sheclown

It was through the city's neighborhoods division back then.

The city did work with people ... the great auction in '98 (or was it '99).  It put a lot of money  on the table.

I don't know what was involved in getting the city involved, but it was an amazing thing to behold, the renovations occurring on every block, dumpsters everywhere, people grabbing anyone who walked down the sidewalk and giving them a paint brush.  Hammers flying.  Carolina Lumber jammed up with customers.  Pascos needing to move to a new location to keep up with it all.  

Good times.

Out of neighborhood paint contractors giving cheap prices for exterior paint jobs and then fleeing in the night when they realized the extent of prep work --

Good times.

You could drive up and down any street and find good windows on the curb, used flooring, old doors, old trim.  We filled up Phil Neary's house on West 7th with stuff (of course, his house got torn down...all in the name of condemnation and progress...a couple of years ago).

Good times.

The neighborhood worked together then, or perhaps I was just naive.

mtraininjax

QuoteThe housing market, which we keep hearing is improving, is still not at the very bottom.

Really??????? Are you a realtor? Is your 8-5 business real estate? Just because Springfield has yet to hit rock bottom does not mean that other areas of town are thriving and doing well. 2009 was great for local real estate, better than 2008 for sure. 2010 is already very, very good for most real estate companies locally, if you don't think so, call a few. Heck even got back from the boat show, where its harder to sell boats than even real estate, and many brokers said it was better show than 2008. Most had sold more boats already this year than they did all of last year.

As for Springfield, I laugh at those who say they want the City to manage their programs. Are you for real? They can't even manage their own city budgets, yet, you want them to manage what paint people can put on their house? Get real.
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

"This is a game-changer. This is what I mean when I say taking Jacksonville to the next level."
-Mayor Alvin Brown on new video boards at Everbank Field

Lunican

Quote from: mtraininjax on February 07, 2010, 04:49:22 PM
Really??????? Are you a realtor? Is your 8-5 business real estate? Just because Springfield has yet to hit rock bottom does not mean that other areas of town are thriving and doing well. 2009 was great for local real estate, better than 2008 for sure. 2010 is already very, very good for most real estate companies locally, if you don't think so, call a few.

What are you trying to say? This makes no sense. 

Miss Fixit

Quote from: mtraininjax on February 07, 2010, 04:49:22 PM
QuoteThe housing market, which we keep hearing is improving, is still not at the very bottom.

Really??????? Are you a realtor? Is your 8-5 business real estate? Just because Springfield has yet to hit rock bottom does not mean that other areas of town are thriving and doing well. 2009 was great for local real estate, better than 2008 for sure. 2010 is already very, very good for most real estate companies locally, if you don't think so, call a few. Heck even got back from the boat show, where its harder to sell boats than even real estate, and many brokers said it was better show than 2008. Most had sold more boats already this year than they did all of last year.

As for Springfield, I laugh at those who say they want the City to manage their programs. Are you for real? They can't even manage their own city budgets, yet, you want them to manage what paint people can put on their house? Get real.

How can anyone say whether or not Springfield has "hit rock bottom" or not?  Higher sales in 2009 than in 2008 and increasing sales in 2010 suggest that perhaps the worst is over....

strider

QuoteThe housing market, which we keep hearing is improving, is still not at the very bottom. For instance, we hear about the Springfield market and that new buyers are coming in. We need to not only say great, new buyers, but realize why they are here. Great values now that the market has crashed. Many are very low priced foreclosures. I know one house that the couple who owned it did at least 120K worth of work and the house is now available about fives years later for under 60K. It may need some work, but it is a better value now that it was five or six years ago before it got the work it needed then.

The statement you are questioning, mtraininjax, was actually from something I posted on a different thread.  Samiam quoted it in a post he did in that thread and then requoted his post here.  The point was, we do hear how much better the market is here in Springfield and that people are finding it to be more desirable than other areas. From local realtors.  Of course, the numbers say that while volume is up, the values are way down, something like 60% to 70% from one year ago and they were depressed then.  As an average.  So houses like the one in my example is probably more like 20 % to 25 % of what it was valued at 30 months ago.  I am sure, no, I know, that the same kinds of deals or issue, depending on whether you are on the selling or buying side of things can be found all over Jacksonville. Even on the river, but remember, everything is realitive. High dollar is still high dollar.  Just not as much.  

The façade grant, interestingly enough, was actually for lower income buyers.  They had to get special dispensation to increase the income thresholds to I believe 120% of median income(?) when it was normally 80% (?). Even so, it allowed the younger and less wealthy to move into Springfield.  It was later that the values were forced up beyond reason (In some cases) by both “market” driven reasons and the increasing costs to build or renovate.
"My father says that almost the whole world is asleep. Everybody you know. Everybody you see. Everybody you talk to. He says that only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement." Patrica, Joe VS the Volcano.