A look at Oakleaf Town Center

Started by Metro Jacksonville, December 28, 2007, 04:30:00 AM

thelakelander

No building in areas that can't support it would be a good place to start.  Impact fees would be another thing that could help expand infrastructure.  We're one of the few places in Florida that does not have impact fees.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

gatorback

Oh, like that license plate thingamabobby few years back.  I completely support taxing new residences.  After all they should pay for our lack of planning right?
'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Queen and Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'   Mary, queen of Scots to her jailer, Sir Amyas Paulet; October 1586

thelakelander

They (and existing residents who choose to move to remote spots) should pay if they want to live in areas that can't support additional development.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

dowtown-entrepreneur

As far as OakLeaf splitting into its own 'jurisdiction', there has been plenty of talk in that direction. The residents of OakLeaf have contemplated breaking away from the city of Orange Park and creating their own government. They are not happy with the city of Orange Park's handling of traffic, schools, etc. And OakLeaf will have a complete school system, i.e. K-12, very shortly. If I'm not mistaken they already have a K-8 school. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in 2-3 years.

gatorback

'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Queen and Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'   Mary, queen of Scots to her jailer, Sir Amyas Paulet; October 1586

thelakelander

I don't think Oakleaf was ever a part of the City of Orange Park.  The City of Orange Park's boundaries are east of Blanding.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

second_pancake

Quote from: thelakelander on January 01, 2008, 04:34:04 PM
They (and existing residents who choose to move to remote spots) should pay if they want to live in areas that can't support additional development.

Or...they should be self-sufficient!  Amen! But, that of course, would mean the federal government getting involved as it is against the law for a person to set up a permanent dwelling where there is no underground sewer or wastewater system.
"What objectivity and the study of philosophy requires is not an 'open mind,' but an active mind - a mind able and eagerly willing to examine ideas, but to examine them criticially."

thelakelander

QuoteOr...they should be self-sufficient!  Amen! But, that of course, would mean the federal government getting involved as it is against the law for a person to set up a permanent dwelling where there is no underground sewer or wastewater system.

The developers who are building the new developments should be funding infrastructure upgrades to reach their property, as well as putting money into a pot to support future school and road expansions that will be needed from continued growth in their immediate area.  Ideally, if this is done, the new residents will pay their fair share because the developers will just pass the costs down to them in the sale of their new homes.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

second_pancake

Yeah, lake, but that would mean the developers would now have long-term responsibility, and who wants that when you can just destroy, build, and bolt?
"What objectivity and the study of philosophy requires is not an 'open mind,' but an active mind - a mind able and eagerly willing to examine ideas, but to examine them criticially."

thelakelander

If the City and community really wants to better manage the growth, then somethings that aren't popular with the development community will have to be put in place.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Lunican

Do things that aren't popular with the development community? Isn't the city council president Daniel Davis also the Director of the Northeast Florida Builders Association?

In most places this would be considered a conflict of interest, but in Jacksonville it is an honorable addition to your resume for city council.

QuoteDaniel is the Director of the Northeast Florida Builders Association (NEFBA), representing the building and construction industry in Duval, Clay, St. Johns and Nassau counties on state-wide issues.
http://www.coj.net/City+Council/District+12/default.htm

tufsu1

Quote from: thelakelander on January 02, 2008, 04:08:21 PM
QuoteOr...they should be self-sufficient!  Amen! But, that of course, would mean the federal government getting involved as it is against the law for a person to set up a permanent dwelling where there is no underground sewer or wastewater system.

The developers who are building the new developments should be funding infrastructure upgrades to reach their property, as well as putting money into a pot to support future school and road expansions that will be needed from continued growth in their immediate area.  Ideally, if this is done, the new residents will pay their fair share because the developers will just pass the costs down to them in the sale of their new homes.

its called concurrency....and believe it or not, its the law in Florida

thelakelander

#27
Yes, I'm familiar with concurrency, we deal with it on a daily basis on many of the projects in the office.  However, since many of the new developments still end up costing the community more than what they bring in, the current system is a failure.  I don't know the what the final solution should be, but whether its upping fees, restricting development in certain areas, improving mass transit or increasing the density in places with adaquate infrastructure, something new needs to be done.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

tufsu1

one of the biggest misconceptions about concurrency is that development doesn't pay its fair share....in fact, large developments in many parts of the state pay more than their fair share....its many of the small projects that get by without having to pay at all.

also important to note is that cities have set up concurrency exception areas to encourage infill development....Jacksonville has done this downtown. 

thelakelander

Quotein fact, large developments in many parts of the state pay more than their fair share....its many of the small projects that get by without having to pay at all.

True.  Unfortunately, when its all added up, there are several more smaller developments going up statewide, in areas with limited to no capacity to support them, then the large developments.  As you already know, this has resulted in some municipalities and counties having impact fees, in addition to concurrency.

Quotealso important to note is that cities have set up concurrency exception areas to encourage infill development....Jacksonville has done this downtown.

In some cities (I can't think of any in Florida), they have set up tax abatement programs to encourage infill development in older areas with infrastructure already in place as well, with great success.

It would be nice to have this downtown concurrency exception extended to the inner core neighborhoods also, especially in the Northside.  At one point, most of these areas had three times as much density, so a vast amount of infill could happen fairly easily because the infrastructure is already in place.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali