The nail in the coffin of suburban development?

Started by zoo, June 03, 2008, 08:17:44 AM

zoo

Overbuilding
No credit market
High gas prices

And now... S.2191, a "cap & trade" law on carbon emissions.

Anyone know anything about this, or have any thoughts? Though this will have significant financial ramifications to US economy and markets, IMHO as an urbanite it's about time policy caught up with climate change. Summary of bill is below. How far behind can application to suburban developers be?

QuoteTitle: A bill to direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to establish a program to decrease emissions of greenhouse gases, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Lieberman, Joseph I. [CT] (introduced 10/18/2007)      Cosponsors (11)
Related Bills: S.3036
Latest Major Action: 5/20/2008 Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 740.
Senate Reports: 110-337
SUMMARY AS OF: 10/18/2007--Introduced.

America's Climate Security Act of 2007 - Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish: (1) a greenhouse gas (GHG) registry; and (2) a GHG emission allowance transfer system for covered facilities, including specified facilities within the electric power and industrial sectors and facilities that produce or entities that import petroleum- or coal- based transportation fuel or chemicals. Sets forth emission allowances for 2012-2050, with a declining cap on GHGs.

Provides for selling, exchanging, transferring, submitting, retiring, or borrowing emission allowances. Establishes: (1) a domestic offset program to sequester GHGs in agriculture and forests; and (2) the Bonus Allowance Account.

Establishes the Carbon Market Efficiency Board, which shall observe and report on the national GHG emission market and provide cost relief measures if it determines that the market poses significant harm to the U.S. economy.

Provides for the distribution of emission allowances, including initially giving allowances to: (1) specified owners and operators of covered facilities; (2) states; (3) load-serving entities that deliver electricity to retail consumers; (4) the Secretary of Agriculture to reduce GHG emissions in the agriculture and forestry sectors; (5) international forest protection activities; and (6) the Emission Allowance Account for covered facilities in the electric power and industrial sectors.

Establishes in the Treasury and provides for allocations from: (1) the Energy Assistance Fund; (2) the Climate Change Worker Training Fund; (3) the Adaptation Fund; and (4) the Climate Change and National Security Fund.

Establishes the Climate Change Credit Corporation to auction emission allowances. Provides for the use of auction proceeds, including for a zero- or low-carbon energy technologies program, an advanced coal and sequestration technologies program, incentives for production of fuel from cellulosic biomass, and an advanced technology vehicles manufacturing incentive program.

Amends the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to set forth provisions concerning appliance energy efficiency requirements and state building energy efficiency code updates.

Requires the President to establish an interagency group to determine whether foreign countries have addressed GHGs.

Directs the Administrator to establish an international reserve allowance program. Requires the proceeds from sales of such allowances to be used to mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on other countries' disadvantaged communities.

Amends the Safe Drinking Water Act to require the Administrator to permit commercial-scale underground injection of carbon dioxide for purposes of geological sequestration.

Requires the Secretary of Energy to study the feasibility of the construction of: (1) pipelines for the transportation of carbon dioxide for sequestration or enhanced oil recovery; and (2) geological carbon dioxide sequestration facilities.

Directs the Administrator to establish a task force to study the cost implications of potential federal assumption of liability with respect to closed geological storage sites.

Authorizes the President to waive this Act's requirements in a national security emergency.

Requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to direct securities issuers to inform investors of material risks related to climate change.

downtownparks

The odds of this passing in the next 9 months is nill. I would probably only expect to see it pass if the Dems win the white house, and establish a near filibuster-proof majority in Congress.

That said, I would agree, it sure seems to slam the door on outward expansion, and encourages people to re congregate into community centers near where they can work, shop, and play.

zoo

Actually, DTP, all three candidates are supporting a cap and trade system on emissions in some form or another. Take a look at this link:

http://www.johnmccain.com/climatechange/

Still think it won't pass? With America's growing environmental concern, all candidates will have to take some carbon emissions measure. One proposed alternative to cap and trade is a carbon emissions tax. I can't imagine any of the candidates wanting to embrace that one.

Stigmatization of suburban anything is growing.

obie1

It's already happening. Some suburbs in the U.S. are sliding toward becoming wasteland ghettos, and it's a frightening thought. The poor will be stranded in a sprawl without the ability to move to denser, walkable locations and the jobs that exist there. A living hell for the much less well off. Makes me shudder.

zoo


downtownparks

#5
Subruban Decay is another catch phrase I have heard a couple of times. In some cities in the NE and Mid-west, the housing slump alone has caused it. I believe it was Stephen who posted a rather scary story about Shaker Heights ohio. I will see if I can find it again.


thelakelander

I wonder what the ignorant forumers on the Vanguard News Network would say about the Sinclairs decision to not pay their mortgage?
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

downtownparks

That was an accident. I didnt read the thread, I just posted the thread because it had the story Stephen had posted about Shaker Hieghts. Im really sorry About that. I will see if I can find the thread on here and repost it.


obie1

Maybe it is just a matter of time before all the money moves into the major cities, builds a moat, and raises the draw bridges.

zoo

Excerpt from a white paper called "Driven to the Brink" showing effects of gas prices on housing.

Housing Prices Are Declining Fastest in the Suburbs

Observers of local real estate markets have noticed that not all neighborhoods in a given metropolitan
area are affected by the same degree by the housing downturn.  Within metropolitan areas, it appears
that markets on the suburban fringe are generally experiencing the greatest declines, and consumer
demand remains relatively stronger for close-in properties.  For example, while exurbs in places
like Denver and Salt Lake City offer big houses on large lots at low prices, many buyers today are
forsaking size for the conveniences of being close to the city, often in areas that are redeveloping
(Opdyke 2008).

Our analysis of intra-metropolitan patterns of housing price changes over the past year finds that
prices have declined most in the most distant suburbs.  On average, over the past 12 months, the
decline in a neighborhood 12 miles from the center of the central business district is 2 to 4 percentage
points greater than the decline in housing prices in neighborhoods 2 miles from the CBD.

Link to complete white paper (tried to attach, but file too large):
http://www.ceosforcities.org/rethink/research/index.php

fatcat

the "carbon trade" is already wildly accepted. Lieberman obviously has a lots of clout. I expect the carbon trade to pass no matter who is in the white house.

willydenn

Quote from: fatcat on September 20, 2008, 01:25:14 PM
the "carbon trade" is already wildly accepted. Lieberman obviously has a lots of clout. I expect the carbon trade to pass no matter who is in the white house.

Let's all pray that it doesn't.   

jandar

Give me my back yard, not a concrete jungle.
Not everyone wants to live stacked on top of each other, I rather prefer to mow my yard and and breath much cleaner air.
Not all of us want to be bombarded by neon signs, some of us actually prefer being able to see the milky way with our naked eyes from our back porch.


Even if gas goes to 100$ a gallon, my career would allow me to work entirely from home, negating the need to move into a city.

Its fine that most on here want us to live all in cities, but not everyone shares that same sentiment. I would much rather live by myself on 100 acres than have a neighbor close by. The suburbs are a good compromise for my current line of work and my lifestyle needs.