Historic Springfield Demolition COA signed today: 1647 Pearl

Started by iloveionia, March 01, 2012, 05:42:04 PM

Debbie Thompson

Preach it, Strider!  It'an HISTORIC district, for crying out loud!  Why would you tear down historic homes?  This house, and so many of the others, can be saved.  Is the system broken?  Oh, yes.  Do we need more tools in the tool box of preservation?  Without a doubt.  Instead of wholesale destruction, how about working solutions instead?  Solutions that will bring this house and all the others an opportunity.

BTW...disagree with you, Kaiser.  This house is most certainly not a POS. It is structurally sound, and eminently salvagable.

sheclown

Quote from: Kaiser Soze on March 15, 2012, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Timkin on March 12, 2012, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on March 12, 2012, 08:41:46 PM
Wait, so they're just now getting around to ordering a structural engineering report AFTER it was already supposed to have been demolished? You gotta be kidding me.

I guess I'm not following.... are they doing this structural engineering report now to have an angle to proceed with demolition?
I hope so.  That POS has been unoccupied for 15 years

He must mean "piece of specialness"

Kaiser Soze

Quote from: sheclown on March 15, 2012, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Kaiser Soze on March 15, 2012, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Timkin on March 12, 2012, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on March 12, 2012, 08:41:46 PM
Wait, so they're just now getting around to ordering a structural engineering report AFTER it was already supposed to have been demolished? You gotta be kidding me.

I guess I'm not following.... are they doing this structural engineering report now to have an angle to proceed with demolition?
I hope so.  That POS has been unoccupied for 15 years

He must mean "piece of specialness"
I never refer to poo as "specialness."

Timkin

Quote from: Kaiser Soze on March 15, 2012, 02:14:49 PM
Quote from: sheclown on March 15, 2012, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: Kaiser Soze on March 15, 2012, 10:23:52 AM
Quote from: Timkin on March 12, 2012, 09:06:52 PM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on March 12, 2012, 08:41:46 PM
Wait, so they're just now getting around to ordering a structural engineering report AFTER it was already supposed to have been demolished? You gotta be kidding me.

I guess I'm not following.... are they doing this structural engineering report now to have an angle to proceed with demolition?
I hope so.  That POS has been unoccupied for 15 years

He must mean "piece of specialness"
I never refer to poo as "specialness."

You must work for the city

acme54321

Seems like the problem would be solved by allowing the city to foreclose on these properties once the fines reach the value of the property.  Then auction them off and recoup the fines they will never see.  Instead the city is paying for demolitions.  How much does that cost?  10k per house? 

iloveionia

$5-$12k depending on size and scope.
The Jewish Center would have been well beyond $12k


Kaiser Soze

Quote from: acme54321 on March 15, 2012, 02:54:05 PM
Seems like the problem would be solved by allowing the city to foreclose on these properties once the fines reach the value of the property.  Then auction them off and recoup the fines they will never see.  Instead the city is paying for demolitions.  How much does that cost?  10k per house?
This would be my answer.

Miss Fixit

Quote from: Kaiser Soze on March 15, 2012, 04:05:25 PM
Quote from: acme54321 on March 15, 2012, 02:54:05 PM
Seems like the problem would be solved by allowing the city to foreclose on these properties once the fines reach the value of the property.  Then auction them off and recoup the fines they will never see.  Instead the city is paying for demolitions.  How much does that cost?  10k per house?
This would be my answer.

The city already has the ability to do this.  They simply choose not to.