The Skyway Poll

Started by Ocklawaha, December 07, 2007, 11:02:08 AM

What should be done with our expensive Skyway Investment in Jacksonville? You may choose as many statements as you agree with.

Leave it just like it is
0 (0%)
Expand it to San Marco at Atlantic
23 (62.2%)
Expand it to Riverside - 5 Points
26 (70.3%)
Expand it to The Stadium area
32 (86.5%)
Expand it Across from Rosa Parks and into the Campus of FCCJ for student safety
13 (35.1%)
Operate some trains late night or all night
13 (35.1%)
Provide roving Conductor-Guides
3 (8.1%)
Drop all fare on the Skyway, make it free
15 (40.5%)
Use Skyway to replace most buses on downtown streets
16 (43.2%)
Tie the Skyway into regional rapid transit as a downtown feeder
25 (67.6%)
Replace the Monorail with a Sky-Train along the Skyway routes
4 (10.8%)
Build more transfer facilities such as Rosa Parks
8 (21.6%)
Expand the Skyway to larger 4 or 6 car trains
13 (35.1%)
Shorten the headways between trains
7 (18.9%)
Complete the Skyway improvements BEFORE we build a BRT system
25 (67.6%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Voting closed: December 22, 2007, 11:02:08 AM

Ocklawaha

Well Jacksonville, we all seem to have some opinion on our Skyway. Was it really Gods gift to Mass-Transit, or was it a devine gift completely screwed up by the powers that be? Could it be salvaged and turned into the show piece of downtown? Should we just give up and tear it down? Maybe you think we could run something else up there? Here is a little poll that should run for 15 days. You can answer by placing a check in any box you agree with... You can answer as many or as few as you would like. If you don't agree with a statement, just leave it blank. We really need to see what the people feel about this:  

Ocklawaha

thelakelander

I voted for:

1. Tie the Skyway into regional rapid transit as a downtown feeder
2. Drop all fare on the Skyway, make it free
3. Use Skyway to replace most buses on downtown streets
4. Expand it to The Stadium area

As for extending it to Five Points, San Marco, increasing service, etc., I'd prefer that money be taken to help fund a regional transit system that could tie into the existing skyway (feeding it riders), while that new transit system connects these areas with downtown and others beyond.  Given the expense and visual blight of an elevated system, it seems we would be better off spending less on something that's more attractive and set up to extend further outside of downtown.

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Pavers

Lake, a few questions for you - do you know the answers or where to go to get the answers for the following:

What it costs the JTA to annually operate/maintain the skyway, and what is its operating deficit is after rider fares are included?
How many riders use the Skyway annually?  (I guess this would be counted in number of trips, yes?)


lindab

Quote from: Ocklawaha on December 07, 2007, 11:02:08 AM
Well Jacksonville, we all seem to have some opinion on our Skyway. Was it really Gods gift to Mass-Transit, or was it a devine gift completely screwed up by the powers that be? Could it be salvaged and turned into the show piece of downtown? Should we just give up and tear it down? Maybe you think we could run something else up there?
Ocklawaha

Divine gift my eye!  Where is the option for tearing it down?


thelakelander

Total capital costs for the 2.5 mile skyway was $184 million or $73.6 million per mile.  According to this document, the skyway's operating costs are around $3.5 million annually or $10.71 per passenger mile.

http://www.dot.state.co.us/northI25eis/newsletters/sept04/Transit_Technology_Analysis_AGV.pdf

As of 2002, it only has about 3,000 riders a day.

QuoteAccording to an ABC news report in July, 2002, the system was only carrying 3,000 riders per day, far fewer than was projected. Skyway revenues were reported to be $513, 694 in FY 2001 but expenses were $3.5 million. All eight stops are now in operation. The full system was opened to the public in November 2000. Skyway spokespersons blamed the poor downtown economy for the low ridership achieved so far, but argued that it would prove to be a success in the future.  As of 2004, fares were 35 cents for individual rides, 10 cents for elderly riders.

http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans/jack.htm
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Ocklawaha

The actual cost per passenger boarded comes to $17.50. But this isn't the whole story, fact is if we ran the same figures for your neighborhood street or highway, you'd probably have a heart attack. Further? Well it is said that for every Amtrak passenger, the federal government lays out about $35.00... Would you believe for every airline passenger that number is closer to $130.00?? TRUE! Most Monorails/Skyways/Light Rail/Bus or BRT systems have numbers closer to the revenue, costs about $1 - 3.00 per passenger. Seattles is one of the lowest cost per passenger in the nation for ANY transit system.

The whole trouble in Jacksonville is we have not finished the Skyway in ANY FORM! We never replaced any surface buses with it, never built more then Rosa Parks, and frankly just walked away from it. There ARE cheaper ways to expand it, larger equipment to enhance it's abilitys, and many other improvements that could be done. It will take leadership at the top, and a good set of brass (male parts) to make it happen. My hope is EVERYONE will take the poll and give us a ballpark on where to start.


Ocklawaha

Skot David Wilson

Run it to 295 & 10, 95 & JTB, The Gator Bowl, and out by Regency Square and use it instead of light rail because of right-of-way concerns and costs. MAKE it function as a commuter system as it should be. Send it up at least to Shands as well, with a feeder into Five Points, a few downtown spurs, spurs in San Marco to just beyond St. Nicholas, maybe as far as Beach & St Johns... then make connecvtors to an orange park light rail system, and run light rail from Baymeadows along that wide right of way there.
An intergrated system with park & rides would save so much fuel and parking fees that most downtown drivers would start using it. Make it $3-5.00 for a round trip park & ride. That would about equal parking fees, and save fuel, and more than pay for the lines, except light rail from OP and baymeadows, which should be about $8-10. Figure $3(+?+?+?) per gallon and two gallons a day, plus the time wasted and parking and many would jump on the train because it would actually save both time and money.
Since the light rail infrastructure is just about in place, start there with two Baymeadows and two Southside stations with parking and bus tie-ins dropping at the skyway terminal just before the bridge. NJTransit style cars would be ideal on an electrified track, but even a small diesel to start would do it. They could even use a work truck to move two cars if they had to. There are a lot of second hand cars around.
Once it is clear that someone could park and shoot straight downtown to the skyway anyone near that line who is sick of gas pumps, parking lots and traffic would jump on board real quick. The other line could be OP with two stops there, one at the base, Ortega naturally, one along Roosevelt across from Kent, and the last between Edgewood and McDuff, dropping either there with a bus or skyway hop into town, or maybe a transfer terminal just past Stockton by the creek, which is an easy extension for the skyway.
Picture someone getting on a train in OP, and beating traffic to Southside with no Buckman, let alone the fast run downtown! No 10/95 merge, lines, heavy traffic, costly parking, wear and tear on cars....
It might take two years to get real ridership, but once it did this city would have a better standard of living.
A Shot in the Dark is Occasionally A Direct Hit

thelakelander

The skyway's technology isn't set up to be extended outside of the downtown core.  Its a slow moving expensive horizontal elevator.  Mass transit should be extended to the suburbs, feeding downtown riders into the skyway, but there are several more affordable options out there, then building elevated skyway infrastructure all over town.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Captain Zissou

I voted to send it to the stadium, replace the buses downtown and send it to 5 Points.  To clarify, when I say send it to five points I mean send it to Annie Lytle, not past I-95.  The complications with sending it under the bridge and then replacing some park area for a station are not appealing to me.  I just feel like as of right now it goes from one office building to another, without ever really serving any destination locations around the core.

Ocklawaha

WE CAN'T BE LOUD UNLESS YOU VOTE!  

Have you taken the poll on the Skyway? If I get enough numbers on this, I will carry it to Peyton and Company myself!

Ocklawaha

Jason

I voted for options:

(3.)  Expand it to Riverside - 5 Points
(4.)  Expand it to The Stadium area
(5.)  Expand it Across from Rosa Parks and into the Campus of FCCJ for student safety
(6.)  Operate some trains late night or all night

(8.)  Drop all fare on the Skyway, make it free
(9.)  Use Skyway to replace most buses on downtown streets
(10.) Tie the Skyway into regional rapid transit as a downtown feeder

(12.) Build more transfer facilities such as Rosa Parks  4 (3.1%)
(13.) Expand the Skyway to larger 4 or 6 car trains  7 (5.5%)
(14.) Shorten the headways between trains  5 (3.9%)
(15.) Complete the Skyway improvements BEFORE we build a BRT system


I would really like to see a completed system that extends to all the edges of the core.  From there rail, busses, and BRT would feed riders from the burbs into the system.  Making the Skyway free is a fantastic idea and should help to alleviate and transfer burdens.  Also, busses should be removed almost entirely from the core and replaced with free trollys (at least the rubber wheeled ones) that have clearly marked stations and route maps.  As the system grows more cars should be added, headways shortened, and operation hours extended (at least until after the bars close to keep people from behind the wheel).  I think the skyway should be THE system for downtown and other sections of town could be served by other modes.

Ocklawaha

NO need to post a reply, just make sure you take the Skyway Poll!  

Ocklawaha

gatorback

#12
When I lived downtown I took the skyway almost daily as my sister  lives in San Macro.  Extending the skyway to san marco square would be great. I had to hoof it to her house about a 15 minute walk from San Marco Station.
'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Queen and Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'   Mary, queen of Scots to her jailer, Sir Amyas Paulet; October 1586

Ocklawaha

#13
Not much time... If you have an opinion on the Skyway, TAKE THE POLL before it closes...

Top of this thread, just a few seconds to click a message to the City.

Gatorback, thanks for your input. I'd really like to see it connected to a new Zeppelin Aircraft pad in the Southside, so we could take that giant leap backwards in Style. Watch the Sky and not just the Skyway y'all because ZEPPELIN is back and coming to America! Being courted by available Cities from Coast to Coast, but not Jacksonville. Gatorback, if Austin get's a Zeppelin field, I'M MOVING!

SO MAYBE I'll do a Zeppelin poll next? For now... PLEASE DO THE SKYWAY POLL!
Ocklawah
a

gatorback

#14
Great idea Ocklawaha and we shouldn’t stop there either. Let’s extend the skyway down onto the St. Johns River at water level.  This way, we can take our hovercraft service from green cove springs to downtown jax, hop on the skyway all the way back to South Point. Yes it's doubling back but heck the JEA has money to burn.  Is South Point the logical place for our Zeppelin Aircraft pad?  Wouldn't you want the pad at the top of a building in downtown?  We could grab a bite to eat at the rotating restaurant before our flight to that mountain you want to build on the north side.  ;D
'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Queen and Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'   Mary, queen of Scots to her jailer, Sir Amyas Paulet; October 1586