The Jacksonville Landing's Redevelopment Plan

Started by Metro Jacksonville, December 16, 2013, 06:25:02 AM

urbanlibertarian

Quote from: avonjax on January 17, 2014, 11:58:59 PM
Quote from: acme54321 on January 17, 2014, 11:00:20 AM
I agree, sell the land.

and do what with the land?
The only thing in my opinion that will benefit downtown is a Landing type use. Otherwise it will never be used by the public. We have plenty of die at 5 already.

I'm saying since the city owns the land under Sleiman's buildings that the city's contribution to this project should be selling the land to Sleiman at a price determined by independent appraisal minus the amount that the city wants to contribute.  There shouldn't need to be any tax breaks invoved with this.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos cutodes (Who watches the watchmen?)

thelakelander

Quote from: IrvAdams on January 19, 2014, 09:06:03 AM
Here's some Census data for zip code 32202 which seems to be the downtown core area. Interestingly it gives the population in 2010 as 7915 but says it's only 5061 now which I absolutely don't agree with. I seriously doubt it's gone down like that in the last three or four years. Anyway, here it is:

http://www.city-data.com/zips/32202.html

32202 also includes Fairfax and parts of the Eastside.  Also, what's officially considered downtown is a part of four zip codes: 32202, 32204, 32255 and 32207.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

IrvAdams

Thanks. Do you think downtown is shrinking in population in recent years? I would think it's on the upswing.
"He who controls others may be powerful, but he who has mastered himself is mightier still"
- Lao Tzu

I-10east

Quote from: thelakelander on January 19, 2014, 09:43:54 AM
32202 also includes Fairfax and parts of the Eastside.

I take it that you meant to say Fairfield.

ProjectMaximus

Quote from: IrvAdams on January 19, 2014, 09:54:25 AM
Thanks. Do you think downtown is shrinking in population in recent years? I would think it's on the upswing.

In general most people would consider it on the upswing. But it depends, like Lake mentioned, what boundaries you include for downtown. And if you're talking since 2010, there's very little room for growth as there hasn't really been any significant increase in housing, if any.

thelakelander

Yes, I meant to say Fairfield. Also, residential living in downtown is on the upswing. It's been on the upswing for about 10 years now.  Unfortunately, we tore so much stuff down between the 1960s-1990s, it will still take years to build the type of density typically associated with a major city's Central Business District.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

spuwho

Per Jax Daily Record:

Sleiman: 'A lot of moving parts' to make Landing plan succeed

By Karen Brune Mathis, Managing Editor

Jacksonville Landing developer Toney Sleiman was blunt Thursday.
"Downtown today sucks," he said.

"I'm sorry if that is offending somebody, but go look at other downtowns that are doing great."

Anyone who knows Toney Sleiman can hear him saying it. He's gruff, insistent and frustrated.

Sleiman wants to redevelop the Landing, the Northbank riverfront marketplace he bought in 2003 for $5 million. It opened in 1987 and enjoyed early popularity with stores like Brookstone, Banana Republic, Laura Ashley, the Gap, The Limited, Ben & Jerry's, Sharper Image and other nationally successful tenants.

Then it began losing some of that luster.

It struggled with a lack of parking, a loss of tenants, a fear of crime and complaints about cleanliness, in addition to a horseshoe design considered a celebration of the river 27 years ago but a shunning of Downtown now.

Its troubles continued as employers relocated Downtown office jobs to suburban office parks. Three economic recessions played a part, too.

Then there was the St. Johns Town Center in Southside. The massive lifestyle center opened in 2005 and developed into a force of shopping, restaurants, residences and hotels.

It became what Downtown wanted to be.

Sleiman has presented redesign and redevelopment plans the past 10 years. But with little support, he shelved them.

"The Landing doesn't work," he said. "I tried. Ten years. "

He now proposes a drastic, and some might say long-awaited, plan of action: Tear it down.

While there will be debates over what happens next, Sleiman wants to rebuild on the site, with restaurants, retail stores, offices, workforce housing and a boutique hotel.

Sleiman has developed lots of property around town, but said his focus now will be "dead on" the Landing.

"This is the core," Sleiman said Thursday.

On Wednesday, he presented a design to the Downtown Investment Authority that incorporated community input.

Sleiman said Thursday he doesn't have a timeframe for redevelopment – or a price tag, other than to emphasize it will take support from government and public sources.

"We have to make it work, and it has to be private-public," Sleiman said.

That means financial incentives from the city.

He said the city was doing a market study on workforce housing, which he expects in 60 days, and he can use the results to approach developers.

The boutique hotel is another component. He said Mayor Alvin Brown and Ted Carter, executive director of the city Office of Economic Development, will accompany him to call on hotel chains.

With the mayor involved, "at least we get inside to talk to them."

Sleiman said the costs to redevelop the Landing will depend on factors such as the number of workforce housing units to be developed, the number of hotel rooms that can be supported, and costs to relocate the Landing's tenants.

He guesses there could be 200-300 housing units and a hotel of 100-150 rooms, but says he really has no idea.

Sleiman considers the stars to be "lined up" in favor of the Landing's redevelopment, citing Brown's support and other favorable responses.

"There is no way in the 21st century that we can have a vibrant Downtown that's thriving ... if we don't focus on the Landing," Brown told the authority Wednesday.

"The Landing is a top priority for my administration," he said.

But it won't be easy. Acknowledging there are "a lot of moving parts," Sleiman knows the deal requires financial and government support and approvals, and a belief there will be a market of residents, tenants and consumers to support the redevelopment.

Sleiman said he intends to visit all City Council members starting next week.

"If I get 19 council people that say yes, a mayor that says yes, a DIA board that says yes and Downtown Vision ... I am going to get everybody on board," he said.

He intends to meet with Jacksonville Civic Council founding Chairman Peter Rummell and other corporate leaders. Sleiman said civic leader Preston Haskell's team was designing the project.

"I can't do it by myself. I have to have help," Sleiman said. "I have to have financial help. I have to have 'help' help. I need the (news)papers supporting me."

Sleiman contends that a world-class Landing will attract business and people.

"Guess what happens Downtown? We fill up those buildings," he said, referring to office towers and structures that struggle with a Northbank office vacancy rate of 21.3 percent.

Compare that to Southbank's 11.1 percent office vacancy rate, or the overall area rate of 18.6 percent, according to the Cushman & Wakefield real estate firm for the fourth quarter.

Sleiman said proposed developments at the Shipyards, in La Villa and even the Laura Street Trio and old Barnett Bank buildings won't make a difference in the core like the Landing can.

"I think the young people want something to happen. I hear it all the time, how tired they are" with no progress for Downtown development to bring jobs, stores and entertainment.

"I am going to be on it every day. We are going to go forward," he said.

But he said he won't wait long.

"I am going to have preliminary numbers in the next 60 days and the city will say yes or no," he said, adding he wouldn't do a "one-year drag-out."

And if the city says no?

He paused.

"I haven't thought about it."

mtraininjax

QuoteJacksonville Landing developer Toney Sleiman was blunt Thursday.
"Downtown today sucks," he said.

he would know, he's owned the structure for 10 years. All this, "I don't know what the costs are going to be" sounds like he wants the City to bail him out of a bad business decision.

Get ready for another Shipyards debacle. I see no positive upside, its all Sleiman talking and the mayor doing as Sleiman wants. How many other "top" priorities does the Mayor have?
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

"This is a game-changer. This is what I mean when I say taking Jacksonville to the next level."
-Mayor Alvin Brown on new video boards at Everbank Field

Keith-N-Jax

Tony is right, DT does suck. The sad thing is that the potential there is just unbelievable.

tlemans

Maybe Sleiman should do a city wide survey of what the public wants the Landing to be like. If city leaders can see the public expressing a demand then maybe Sleiman will get the support he needs. Personally I would like to see something like Pointe Orlando for the Landing. It would also be nice to have rooftop dining at the Landing like Black Sheep restaurant in Five Points.

Ocklawaha

Updates? Is the money now in a giant video screen? WHERE'S THE RESET BUTTON!!

jaxjaguar

I believe they're doing another study to determine the condo / apartment feasibility. Soooooo basically Sleiman is just throwing money away to tease us but he's not actually going to do anything.

tufsu1

^ Sleiman won't do anything without financial support from the City.  So the City is doing its due diligence and determining what the market really will support

downtownbrown

Quote from: tufsu1 on July 13, 2014, 07:01:31 PM
^ Sleiman won't do anything without financial support from the City.  So the City is doing its due diligence and determining what the market really will support

Another way of saying that is: Nothing is happening now, and nothing will be happening for the forseeable future.  Until Khan money (that's real money that doesn't necessarily need the city to subsidize it) comes in somewhere downtown, users like Sleiman won't budge.

tufsu1

apparently there is something about the Landing redevelopment in the Mayor's budget that was just announced