Downtown Buildings Altered Beyond Recognition

Started by Metro Jacksonville, November 28, 2011, 03:10:07 AM

Wacca Pilatka

Central Fire Station on Adams is another good one for this category, though I think that was a 1944 remodeling.

Stephen, thanks for the insights as to why some of these alterations happened.
The tourist would realize at once that he had struck the Land of Flowers - the City Beautiful!

Henry J. Klutho

krazeeboi

While in all cases the original facades were much better, in some cases the altered ones aren't quite as bad and in some cases they are almost unforgivable.

If it hasn't already done so, Jacksonville should look into a facade improvement/restoration program that many cities across the country have implemented.

urbaknight

I called the number on the side of 218 west Adams, which advertised the intent to build condo units. I called but the number had been disconnected. Have they scrapped those plans? If so, why don't they get rid of the ad?

It's a shame because this building is exactly the right type for apartments. And with space for urban style shops at street level, It would be just like the buildings I grew up with in the Northeast cities.

It would be a great addition to Downtown that would take a step toward alleviating my homesickness.

duvaldude08

Quote from: krazeeboi on November 28, 2011, 02:36:27 PM
While in all cases the original facades were much better, in some cases the altered ones aren't quite as bad and in some cases they are almost unforgivable.

If it hasn't already done so, Jacksonville should look into a facade improvement/restoration program that many cities across the country have implemented.

We already have a facade improvement program and the Landing plus several other downtown business were awarded a grant.
Jaguars 2.0

krazeeboi

#19
Quote from: duvaldude08 on November 28, 2011, 03:00:28 PMWe already have a facade improvement program and the Landing plus several other downtown business were awarded a grant.

That's good to see. Hopefully, the owners and tenants of some of the buildings featured will take advantage of the program.

Also, Columbia, SC has a historic building downtown where the exterior has been so heavily altered until it's really beyond restoration. Because it's an ideal representation of the architectural trends of the mid-twentieth century and hasn't retained its original features behind the newer facade, it has received a special landmark designation from the city. Thankfully, it's not too fugly and is actually now being rehabbed for some type of retail use.

Originally it looked like this:



It currently looks like this:



After renovations, it will resemble this:



Tacachale

^The last facade grant was for Laura Street buildings specifically. However, if that proves successful, hopefully they the city will consider expanding the initiative to other areas.
Do you believe that when the blue jay or another bird sings and the body is trembling, that is a signal that people are coming or something important is about to happen?

strider

My sister owns a 1860's building in Ohio.  When she looked into historic grants, she was told that it was not affordable to remove the 1980's facade off the building.  But we learned something interesting.  The more successful a building owner was, the more likely the building would be improved. If the owner of a historic building had the funds and no historic protections were in place, the building got remodeled.  IF the owner did not have the funds, it did not.  In fact, often even basic repairs did not get done. The proverbial two edged sword.  Have money, the building gets what it needs but most likely gets remodeled and so loses it's historic appeal or no money and the building falls into disrepair.

A look downtown and we can pretty much see that it happened the same way here.
"My father says that almost the whole world is asleep. Everybody you know. Everybody you see. Everybody you talk to. He says that only a few people are awake and they live in a state of constant total amazement." Patrica, Joe VS the Volcano.

acme54321

The old chamber of commerce and gas company buildings seem to be the biggest atrocities in this list.  Unfortunately from the outside they also appear to be the most irreversible.

The amount of setback visible in the Hogan building's windows leaves some hope that the original brick is still salvageable under there. Even though the building was rather bland in it's original form it certainly couldn't get any worse than the current concrete fortress look.

Ernest Street

#23
I don't have a pic nor an address, but one old timer once pointed out to me the building directly across from Florida Theatre
(which at the time was the Jax ballet studios) and pointed out the Bastardization of the original arch. he replied that that was the "Draft Building" for the Korean war and also Vietnam.
He also commented that during the 50's too many decisions were made downtown in the afternoon, after "Heavily Alcoholic" lunches.
Are you old enough to remember the term "5 Martini Lunch?" ::)

Dog Walker

3 Martini lunch!  LOL!  After 5 you wouldn't make it out of the restaurant!

Your point is well taken, though.  Those were heavy drinking days.
When all else fails hug the dog.

Debbie Thompson

And the days of "urban renewal" where everything old needed to look modern, or go.  Remember, in the 1950's, these buildings hadn't reached historic, they were just old.  People don't think too much of altering a 40-50 year old building they don't like.  They don't think ahead 50 years to when it could be historically significant.  Especially commercial buildings, which are investments that have to be rented.

I imagine back then, there were few companies that wanted to occupy those old buildings without modern renovations.  Back then, it was considered the smart thing to do.  We were the "Bold New City of the South." Only recently do we recognize it was short-sighted.

Time to re-renovate and bring back the historic detail.


Wacca Pilatka

Quote from: Debbie Thompson on November 29, 2011, 12:55:13 PM
And the days of "urban renewal" where everything old needed to look modern, or go.  Remember, in the 1950's, these buildings hadn't reached historic, they were just old.  People don't think too much of altering a 40-50 year old building they don't like.  They don't think ahead 50 years to when it could be historically significant.  Especially commercial buildings, which are investments that have to be rented.

I imagine back then, there were few companies that wanted to occupy those old buildings without modern renovations.  Back then, it was considered the smart thing to do.  We were the "Bold New City of the South." Only recently do we recognize it was short-sighted.

I think I read that Haydon Burns'  ca. 1960 "Jacksonville Story" presentations emphasized that the city had looked "dated" but now modern architecture was in place.
The tourist would realize at once that he had struck the Land of Flowers - the City Beautiful!

Henry J. Klutho

Mike D

There's a possibility the original buildings are still there underneath all of the additions...or, at least, enough of the original exisits to make restoration possible.  Now, which local companies are willing to get on board and bring some visual life back to downtown by reversing the modernizations?