"The Safer Alternatives Proposals" is just caca

[gatorback]

I mean shooting ranges already fall under EPA guidelines for environmental impact isn't that enough? This is just a way to take away one of the few enjoyabe right we have. God!

[Charles Hunter]

non sequitur much?

What are you talking about?  Maybe a link or quote or something about what exactly is "Safer Alternatives Proposals"?

Please?

[gatorback]

My bad.  The NRA website details this atrocity.  Apparently some tree huggers out there want to ban lead based ammunition. Give me a break!  Of course if you read between the lines, this is a play to limit your right to bear arms.  It's every red blooded american's birth right to pop a cap every once in a while. Okay?

[Charles Hunter]

Ahhh, now I understand.   Will have to ponder this one awhile.  Like what is the alternative to lead in bullets?  How much more does the alternative cost?  How does it affect performance?

But, I have heard talks by gun control folks, that controlling ammo would be a way to achieve their ends, and not run afoul of the 1st Amendment - assuming that "bullets" are not "arms".

[gatorback]

The alternatives will cost more no doubt.  Yet, ponder this:  You've got somebody in your crosshairs, you're ready to take him out with your full-jacket man stoppers.  Do you care if it's lead or some exotic metal bullet that's less harmful to him?  Would the gun control folks care?