Michael Moores new Film: a discussion of the politics. Split from film review.

Started by NotNow, October 03, 2009, 11:39:50 PM

NotNow

#15
There seem to be a lot of questions that you can not, or will not answer.  Throughout this thread I am the only one that has cited references and shown where I got my material.  You have simply insulted my intelligance and called me and my argumants "stupid".  That alone shows any intelligent person the outcome of our discussion.  It is time that you answer some questions.  See above.  If you don't have any reasonable arguments, then move on to something else.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

buckethead


NotNow

Wow, that is quite an indictment of me.  I thought that you didn't want to get personal anymore?  Why do you keep doing it?  From what I have seen, Moore's movie is about fraud and I am interested in hearing how that translates into doing away with capitalism.  

Your apparent smugness in your mental superiority is amusing.  Almost a caricature.  And yet you still don't know the definition of "capitalism".  Kind of funny, huh?  Moore's schtick is the same.  He finds individual cases of sadness or fraud, and uses those instances to argue for socialism.  Documentary?  Please.  

What "kind" of politics do I represent?  What "kind" of politics do YOU represent?  

Maybe you can talk the city into giving you the Snyder building for free for a while and you guys can preach this ca-ca to teenagers and young adults who don't know any better.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

#18
StephenDare! - "So the answer is no.  You haven't seen this movie. or anything hes done in years.

Why are you talking about this?

Your opinion on his work has absolutely no weight, you literally don't know what you are talking about.

You have a lot of nerve.  "

So your views on the military and Law Enforcement carry no weight.  You literally don't know what your talking about.  OK, I won't mention Michael Moore again and you keep quiet about military and Law Enforcement affairs.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

Judgement, principle, character.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

#20
Thank you for making my point.  Anyone with character or principles would make a judgement.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

And there are words for people who do not have principals and values.  I don't have to see a convicted thief steal again to know not to give him my money.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

This isn't worth bickering about.  I know how you feel about MM.  You know how I feel.  Your views match his.  Enjoy yourself.

And,contrary to what you might have heard, the concept of right an wrong, principles, values, really IS simple.  It is just human to want to complicate it.  And only one of us claims to know everything in the world.  :)
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

My opinion is of Michael Moore, not this particular film.  He is only one of a number of people who I will never voluntarily give my money to.  From what I have read, this film is done in much the same way as his other films.There is apparently a market for this stuff.  As I said, enjoy it.
Deo adjuvante non timendum

NotNow

StephenDare!,  the discussion was about whether MM's movie effort was "capitalism".  And then what "capitalism" means.  I did not discuss the movie except in terms of MM's history and reviews.  I haven't ridiculed anyone, unlike you, because that is a dishonest argument.  What does making up "inaccuracies" about what I said say about you?
Deo adjuvante non timendum