NOAA Issues report on severe weather & global warming

Started by Midway ®, June 20, 2008, 10:12:13 PM

Downtown Dweller

Quote from: Midway on June 24, 2008, 03:05:53 PM

Also, I am not the subterranean type.


LOL I would have never guesed that! The things you learn on this site...amazing!

Charleston native

Quote from: Midway on June 24, 2008, 03:05:53 PM
...And, I'm also sure that in the event of a "massive launch" the entire country would become a "nuclear hot zone" so it would not make much difference. But, if you really knew anything about those launch sites, they have no strategic value because if they were targeted, all the missiles would be already launched, and the enemy strike would be upon unpopulated grasslands with empty silos, so actually in the event of nuclear holocaust, that would probably be the safest place to be.

I guess they never told you that.
What a truly ignorant, intellectually void statement. It just proves you have no clue how a nuclear war is strategized. The objective of launching at missile sites is to destroy as many missiles as possible before launch, and we are not a "first launch" nation. So you figure it out.

Since you probably would watch a movie rather than read a book about it, I highly recommend you getting "The Day After" on DVD. It is one of the most accurate depictions of nuclear war available. Talk to me after you watch it. Thanks.

Lunican


RiversideGator


Charleston native

Quote from: stephendare on June 24, 2008, 05:00:39 PM
Ive seen the day after.

Is that really a pretty accurate depiction?
It's one of the only two movies that we watched during our undergraduate space and missile training. There are only a few flaws, but they aren't even glaring ones. It is the most accurate of any Hollywood-made film depicting nuclear war.

Lunican, pretty unoriginal comment, but that was my job in the military. I think I have some legitimate expertise in that field, thank you very much.

Midway ®

Quote from: stephendare on June 24, 2008, 05:00:39 PM
Quote from: Charleston native on June 24, 2008, 04:54:31 PM
Quote from: Midway on June 24, 2008, 03:05:53 PM
...And, I'm also sure that in the event of a "massive launch" the entire country would become a "nuclear hot zone" so it would not make much difference. But, if you really knew anything about those launch sites, they have no strategic value because if they were targeted, all the missiles would be already launched, and the enemy strike would be upon unpopulated grasslands with empty silos, so actually in the event of nuclear holocaust, that would probably be the safest place to be.

I guess they never told you that.
What a truly ignorant, intellectually void statement. It just proves you have no clue how a nuclear war is strategized. The objective of launching at missile sites is to destroy as many missiles as possible before launch, and we are not a "first launch" nation. So you figure it out.

Since you probably would watch a movie rather than read a book about it, I highly recommend you getting "The Day After" on DVD. It is one of the most accurate depictions of nuclear war available. Talk to me after you watch it. Thanks.

Ive seen the day after.

Is that really a pretty accurate depiction?

Yeah, it was just like the nuclear war he served in. Except instead of K rations he ate soylent green.

MMMMM.......tastes like chick'n.


Charleston native


Lunican

Quote from: Charleston native on June 24, 2008, 04:54:31 PM
What a truly ignorant, intellectually void statement. It just proves you have no clue how a nuclear war is strategized. The objective of launching at missile sites is to destroy as many missiles as possible before launch, and we are not a "first launch" nation. So you figure it out.

Since you probably would watch a movie rather than read a book about it, I highly recommend you getting "The Day After" on DVD. It is one of the most accurate depictions of nuclear war available. Talk to me after you watch it. Thanks.

Do launch officers really strategize on nuclear war or would the order be sent down from above?

I would think it would come from above, otherwise our nuclear strategy would vary based on which launch officer is on duty.

RiversideGator

I find it interesting that you two libs (lunican and midway) who claim to support the troops on other occasions are basically attacking the service of a former officer in the US Air Force.  Very classy. 

BTW, when it comes to this sort of expertise, you two couldnt carry his jock.

Lunican



gatorback

Quote from: Driven1 on June 24, 2008, 01:00:03 PM
one sec...i just found some quite interesting stuff...turns out that we have a fugitive (or this person once was) here posting with us!! 

was wanted in another jurisdiction.  trying to find out on what charges.  I'm not sure if i will be able to find THAT info out at https://showcase.duvalclerk.com/searchCases.aspx.


Is it me? LOL

'As a sinner I am truly conscious of having often offended my Creator and I beg him to forgive me, but as a Queen and Sovereign, I am aware of no fault or offence for which I have to render account to anyone here below.'   Mary, queen of Scots to her jailer, Sir Amyas Paulet; October 1586

Midway ®

Quote from: Lunican on June 24, 2008, 11:41:04 PM
I'll leave that to you.

Brilliant!! Finally a profession that suits both his aptitude and demeanor. Miracles do happen!

Midway ®

Quote from: Charleston native on June 24, 2008, 04:54:31 PM
Quote from: Midway on June 24, 2008, 03:05:53 PM
...And, I'm also sure that in the event of a "massive launch" the entire country would become a "nuclear hot zone" so it would not make much difference. But, if you really knew anything about those launch sites, they have no strategic value because if they were targeted, all the missiles would be already launched, and the enemy strike would be upon unpopulated grasslands with empty silos, so actually in the event of nuclear holocaust, that would probably be the safest place to be.

I guess they never told you that.
What a truly ignorant, intellectually void statement. It just proves you have no clue how a nuclear war is strategized. The objective of launching at missile sites is to destroy as many missiles as possible before launch, and we are not a "first launch" nation. So you figure it out.

Since you probably would watch a movie rather than read a book about it, I highly recommend you getting "The Day After" on DVD. It is one of the most accurate depictions of nuclear war available. Talk to me after you watch it. Thanks.

I think that your boy George might have changed that philosophy a bit. But, anyhows, to suggest that the DOD would rely on some mole that lives in a hole in the ground to produce strategy regarding nuclear warfare policy just proves you have been in that hole way too long. That's why they were showing you movies during your training, they wanted to plant some strong images in your head that would override those crazy urges to push that button that you get in the middle of the night. And please don't tell me that it takes more than one person's codes, I already know that, ok?

Charleston native

Is idiocy a natural thing for you Midway, or is it an acquired skill? You and Lunican think with the smidgeon of knowledge of nuclear war that you possess, you honestly know more about nuclear policy than me?That's fine, I'll let you live in your ignorance.

Actually, we watched the movies on our own free time, but they were suggested by our training officers.

River, notice the constant twisting and manipulation of words that these supreme intellectuals use when making their attacks/arguments, such as Lunican's statement about us launch officers strategizing nuclear war. At no time did I say that. It should've been implied that while launch officers don't strategize, we know how it's done by higher ranking officials, because we are trained on the process. I did say that they have no clue how it's done, and the continuous ignorant statements are proving me correct.