No Clear Link Between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer

Started by urbanlibertarian, December 17, 2013, 12:06:02 PM

urbanlibertarian

From the Journal of the National Cancer Institute:

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/05/jnci.djt365.extract

Quote
No Clear Link Between Passive Smoking and Lung Cancer

Judy Peres

A large prospective cohort study of more than 76,000 women confirmed a strong association between cigarette smoking and lung cancer but found no link between the disease and secondhand smoke.

"The fact that passive smoking may not be strongly associated with lung cancer points to a need to find other risk factors for the disease [in nonsmokers]," said Ange Wang, the Stanford University medical student who presented the study at the June 2013 meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Chicago.

Investigators from Stanford and other research centers looked at data from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS). Among 93,676 women aged 50–79 years at enrollment, the study had complete smoking and covariate data (including passive smoking exposure in childhood, adult home, and work) for 76,304 participants. Of those, 901 developed lung cancer over 10.5 mean years of follow-up.

The incidence of lung cancer was 13 times higher in current smokers and four times higher in former smokers than in never-smokers, and the relationship for both current and former smokers depended on level of exposure. However, among women who had never smoked, exposure to passive smoking overall, and to most categories of passive smoking, did not statistically significantly increase lung cancer risk. The only category of exposure that showed a trend toward increased risk was living in the same house with a smoker for 30 years or more. In ...

Whole article here: http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/12/05/jnci.djt365.extract
Sed quis custodiet ipsos cutodes (Who watches the watchmen?)

BridgeTroll

In a boat at sea one of the men began to bore a hole in the bottom of the boat. On being remonstrating with, he answered, "I am only boring under my own seat." "Yes," said his companions, "but when the sea rushes in we shall all be drowned with you."

ChriswUfGator

Wonder how much of that study was funded by tobacco companies.


FSBA

Quote from: ChriswUfGator on December 17, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Wonder how much of that study was funded by tobacco companies.

Who gives a shit. Nobody forced you to go into a place that allows smoking
I support meaningless jingoistic cliches

WmNussbaum

Maybe the operative word is "clear." Like maybe there is a link or maybe not. So, as Harry Callahan said, "You gotta ask yourself a question, punk, 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do you punk?"

ChriswUfGator

Quote from: FSBA on December 24, 2013, 10:36:39 PM
Quote from: ChriswUfGator on December 17, 2013, 09:10:42 PM
Wonder how much of that study was funded by tobacco companies.

Who gives a shit. Nobody forced you to go into a place that allows smoking

Yawn.