SR 9B Costs!

Started by fsujax, October 19, 2011, 10:59:08 AM

tufsu1

correct...the partial interchange will only be for traffic to/from the north....the southern half that includes an extension of the road down to Racetrack comes later....and it is not an SIS project, so it won't be very high on FDOT priorities....which means local $ will likely need to be found.

jandar

Ock, its not just Orange Park traffic, its Mandarin/Orange Park traffic that backs things up.

Why they don't institute a red light feature (ramp meter) on the on ramps like in Atlanta is beyond me (all of 295/9A could use this)

Jdog

All told, when 9B is finally complete, are you all thinking the $200 million range?

fsujax

sounds about right, what will be the total mileage of the project?

Jdog

I think there is a 7.5 mile or so estimate...

thelakelander

That comes out to roughly $27 million a mile, which puts the cost in the range of LRT.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

fsujax

just imagine what sort of outcry there would be if we were spending that on a transit project!

Jdog

That last short extension will be costly.  Racetrack Road will be realigned.  Ultimately St Johns CR 2209 will be feeding into 9B at Racetrack...this I imagine has to add some kind of overpass interchange set-up...further, you could add the costs of the overpass / interchange / service roads that will be built at 2209 and 210 (the existing Publix on CR 210 near Cimmarone) a mile and a half south...maybe over $30 million per mile?


tufsu1

Quote from: thelakelander on October 20, 2011, 08:43:50 AM
That comes out to roughly $27 million a mile, which puts the cost in the range of LRT.

well the flyover ramps are in the range fo $25-$40 million each these days...and you'll have at least 2 on this project (at 9A and at I-95).


thelakelander

^No doubt.  You saw how the TU responded to the mobility plan's Riverside Streetcar that got tied into Mayor Brown's downtown transition team committee's report.  That 3.5-mile project would only be around $10 to $14 million per mile and it's supposed to be funded by the mobility fee 100%.  We build flyovers that cost more than that and no one questions the validity or return of investment on those projects.  We have our work cut out for us.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

mtraininjax

QuoteWhy they don't institute a red light feature (ramp meter) on the on ramps like in Atlanta is beyond me (all of 295/9A could use this)

Because that would mean we would need a new expansion of government at a time when we are trying to contract government, not expand it. We don't have traffic like Orlando or Atlanta, so why waste money on it?
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

"This is a game-changer. This is what I mean when I say taking Jacksonville to the next level."
-Mayor Alvin Brown on new video boards at Everbank Field

fsujax

agree. there is no need for ramp metering here.

Jdog

I think that's about right...



peestandingup

Quote from: thelakelander on October 20, 2011, 08:43:50 AM
That comes out to roughly $27 million a mile, which puts the cost in the range of LRT.

Sometimes cheaper. Austin's cost $105 Million & is 32 miles long. And the cost of just the initial phase of this road would pretty much build a vintage streetcar line in our entire core as well.

This city's priorities are completely screwed. Yes, where's the outcry?? Because I guarantee you if this were being spent on public transit, we'd never hear the end of it.

thelakelander

Here are some random maps and aerials showing 9B.






more pics at: http://www.sr9b.com/sr9b/AboutUs.aspx



"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali