QuoteAfter plans for an April groundbreaking came and went for Holon's Northwest Jacksonville manufacturing facility, officials for the autonomous transportation company and Jacksonville's city government have shared no details on what could come next.
.Quote from: Ken_FSU on May 17, 2026, 11:43:09 AMQuote from: Jankelope on May 17, 2026, 08:11:18 AMIt is quite incredible the scrutiny for tiny amounts of affordable housing funding compared to projects like this
It's truly wild. As a city, we've committed three times more taxpayer dollars from the general fund for this single, ultra-luxury apartment complex ($38 million) than we've committed to affordable housing and homeless services for the entire year combined ($12 million).
Jacksonville has a 50,000 unit shortfall in affordable housing that our citizens openly report to be the most important issue in Jacksonville, and wildly unproven demand for $5k apartment rents on the river.
It's weird to me how elements of the city gets themselves worked into an uproar over spending money on parks or stadium improvements, but no one seems to be questioning a monstrous, near-$40 million cash hand out from taxpayers to Related.
Think of how hard those dollars could work if used for down payment assistance, beefing up an affordable housing trust like you see in cities like Atlanta, expanding beds in homeless shelters, subsidizing more workforce housing with state support, etc.
I'm sure it will be beautiful, I question if it will be full, and have no doubt that are better uses of taxpayer dollars, at a time when the city's general fund is already stretched thin. Subsidies for projects like the Gateway Publix development, stadium improvements, Laura Street Trio, parks, and even the Four Seasons all make sense to me. They're providing reasonably equitable public services, saving critically endangered historic building stock, or addressing a major gap in the market that will start generating bed tax dollars immediately. Don't see it with this one. REV grants and a $10 million completion grant? Sure. $38 million from the general fund. Woof.
Quote from: Jankelope on May 17, 2026, 08:11:18 AMIt is quite incredible the scrutiny for tiny amounts of affordable housing funding compared to projects like this
Quote from: Jones518 on April 25, 2026, 01:35:44 AMI got blocked by Ron Armstrong on social media 😅..i guess i was challenging him too much 🤷💀...
Quote from: Ken_FSU on May 15, 2026, 10:50:52 PMQuote from: thelakelander on May 15, 2026, 05:25:13 PMIt's good to see them finally get started. Nothing wrong with another tower in the skyline.
I'm less enthused![]()
I'm all for development, and I realize I'm probably in the minority with this opinion, but not a fan of this project as it stands.
To me, I think it's the least defensible downtown incentive package I've seen since moving to Jacksonville 18 years ago. $60 million in incentives for ultra luxury apartments, with $3k to $8k monthly rents, unattainable to the average Jacksonville citizen.
The $38 million cash completion grant from the general fund is the equivalent of every household in Jacksonville writing Related a check for $100 to subsidize housing for the wealthy, at a time that every dollar we put into affordable housing and social services as a city is scrutinized to death and carved down to nothing. Even on paper, the convenient assumptions and mental gymnastics necessary to even get to a $1.13 ROI requires a 30 year calculation that will make your head spin.
When so many people are struggling to even put food on the table or gas in their cars at 3.8% inflation, negative wage growth, and 5% local unemployment, our taxpayer dollars should be going towards more equitable uses than high-end finishes for C-suite transplants. With the completion grant, it is not imaginary TIF funding. It is literally drawing from the paychecks of the city's working class to build housing for the 5%'ers that are already riding the benefits of K-shaped recovery while everyone else is getting squeezed.
I think it's as bad of a look as taking gas tax dollars from struggling families and ramming them into a vanity transit project that benefits no one and barely works. Our leaders' (and to be clear, both deals predated current leadership) ultimate responsibility is to look out for the populace and responsibly steward the hard-earned dollars we take from them.
If the intent of this massive package for the tower is to stimulate property taxes on the Southbank, I hope this is the last ask from Related for this area. There's no universe where we should allow them to double-dip on incentives if they take over the MOSH site.
QuoteThe Trump administration has jeopardized federal efforts to prevent gun trafficking by diverting law enforcement resources and weakening dealer oversight activities. This will make it more difficult to identify the dealers that are providing guns to traffickers and embolden criminals engaging in this dangerous conduct.
QuoteFor the first time, we have limited access to data on the cities that are the primary sources of crime guns in the U.S. Beginning in 2021, ATF partnered with a team of academic experts to examine firearm commerce, crime guns, and trafficking in a four-volume study called the National Firearms Commerce and Trafficking Assessment (NFCTA).15 Volume Two of the NFCTA focuses on crime guns recovered and traced during domestic and international criminal investigations and includes individual reports for each state and 73 cities that provide detailed information on crime guns recovered in those jurisdictions for the period 2017 to 2021. These state and city reports include the top five source cities of crime guns per state and the total number of crime guns that were originally sold in each city.16 Compiling and combining this data from each NFCTA state and city report, we identified the top 25 source cities of crime guns traced nationwide during this period. Gun dealers in these cities were responsible for selling 209,748 crime guns during this period, accounting for 14 percent of all crime guns recovered and traced.17
QuoteA city's placement on the list of top 25 source cities for crime guns should be concerning to local leaders. Not only are gun dealers in these cities fueling gun violence around the country, but many of the crime guns being sold in these cities are likely being used in violent crime locally. According to the NFCTA state reports, in each of the states where these cities are located, at least half of all crime guns recovered in the state were originally sold by a dealer within 25 miles and nearly a third of the crime guns recovered in these states were recovered within 10 miles of where they were purchased.38 While gun trafficking is usually thought of as an issue of guns crossing state or national borders, in reality, crime guns often don't travel far after purchase and gun trafficking often involves moving guns short distances within a community.
Local leaders should start by taking a close look at the licensed gun dealers operating in these cities. Because of the federal restrictions on access to detailed trace data identifying which FFLs in these cities are the primary sellers of crime guns, it is more difficult for local leaders to know which dealers should receive additional scrutiny. However, one place to start is to use the limited publicly available data to narrow down the dealers in these cities that may warrant a closer look. We used three relevant factors to create a list of such gun dealers in Appendix 3: gun dealers that (1) had an active federal firearms license during the period from 2017 through 2021, (2) still had an active license as of January 2026, and (3) have been subject to ATF's Demand Letter 2 program for at least one year between 2021 and 2024.
Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.