Jaguars on the Field: How do we compare?

[heights unknown]

Jaguars are looking better the last two weeks.  Looks like they might make the playoffs as a wildcard if they keep winning.  Let's keep supporting them even if it's by radio.

Heights Unknown

[Wacca Pilatka]

Just asking you to post a link to the source you cite... pretty simple.

This is an ongoing debate on the Jaguar message board.  Based on estimates from the Packers' books (as Steve mentioned) and other known or intuitive revenue and expense items, Forbes estimated the Jaguars made $28 million in 2007 and $20 million in 2006.  They were ranked right in the middle of the pack in revenues per Forbes.  However, Vic Ketchman on the Jaguar website has implied repeatedly that Forbes was way off and the Jaguars were significantly less profitable than that, and Wayne Weaver said in a T-U interview in the summer that the Jaguars will lose money this year.

[JaxNative68]

who isn't losing money this year?

[Lucasjj]

I don't see how Jacksonville could be profitable this year. Yesterday's game set a franshise record for the lowest attended game. It was even worse looking since there were only 36,000 people in the stands. I believe they have set that record more than once this season.

It was Jacksonville's fifth straight victory at home and came in front of an announced crowd of 42,079 -- the lowest in franchise history.

http://www.news4jax.com/sports/21881723/detail.html

[buckethead]

On the field, Jags compare... oh.... let's see here...


Somewheres around...^{heck, I dunno, I'll just throw this out there...}

7 and 5.


I'll take it.