The Future of Transit in Jacksonville

Started by Metro Jacksonville, February 20, 2008, 10:00:00 AM

JeffreyS

How did the JTA's portion of the presentation go?  Do you think they were well received by the council?  I attended the first council meeting that was pushed back. I do not know if we had more MJers at this meeting but I could tell when I went we could have impressed with even 10 or 20 more people.
Lenny Smash

thelakelander

Their presentation was improved from those in the past, however they were caught off guard by the video, which focused on things that can't be debated (overall costs, timeline, system extents, etc.). 

Their presentation was not received by the council as well as the video was.  There were several tough questions asked that they could not answer.  Nevertheless, I have the feeling that instead of truly looking into the negatives of their BRT plan, JTA will attempt to move forward with BRT as fast as possible to get us to the point of no return.  This means, if no one stops them, expect the $100 million in BJP funds to start to be spent fairly soon.

Maybe we're wasting our time only questioning this at the local level.  Its obvious that our government here is reactive, as opposed to being proactive, so JTA continues to spend, spend and spend money that could be put to a better use.  Maybe its time to take this fight to the Federal level?
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

tufsu1

I really doubt there is any value in taking this to the Federal level right now....keep in mind that the current administration is admantly opposed to rail transit....and not particularly keen on transit in general...for proof, just look at waht is happening with the proposed Dulles Airport Metro extension in D.C.

thelakelander

Oh, I wasn't talking about taking a rail based argument to them.  Like you said, the current administration is anti rail.  Luckily that could all change depending on the upcoming election.

I think most can agree after seeing the numbers and what recently constructed similar systems have cost that our bus rapid transit plan could be considered a poorly thought out turkey.  So I'm wondering if its worth fighting to stop it at a Federal level, regardless of whether a rail plan comes to fruition or not.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." - Muhammad Ali

Lunican

At this point, Jacksonville would probably be better off completely scrapping the current plans and taking no action at all.

The extreme costs and neighborhood destroying aspects of this plan will preclude a better plan from being implemented in the future.

JeffreyS

How many counties does the JTA serve.  I have been emailing the benefits of rail for the surrounding counties to the county commissions, city councils and even the commanding officer at NAS looking for a public statement supporting commuter rail.
Lenny Smash

Charles Hunter

JTA's charter (Florida Statute 349) defines their service area as Duval County.  They can make agreements with other counties to provide bus service.  They have done this with Clay and St. Johns.

The proposed changes to their charter (discussed in another thread) would make that ability more clear (or something).

JeffreyS

Lenny Smash

David6600

Can't a referendum be held to just stop the BRT?  Just an up or down yes or no on it. 

Worry about getting the rail later when there's a new administration and a new environment. 



 


fightingosprey07

I agree, I would much rather have nothing than the full BRT plan. The city already has $100 million set aside for transit, I think they should use that money to fund incentives for companies to relocate downtown, and for developers to build affordable housing downtown. If gas prices keep going up, it might be easier to convince people to live within walking distance of their work.

JeffreyS

They should use the money on transit!!! This was promised to the people of Jax if we voted for the better Jacksonville plan. I could live without another BJP broken promise.  We have  good plans for transit and we will crush the BRT.  Keep the faith and all of you council members reading this KEEP YOUR PROMISES!
Lenny Smash

David6600

#41
I hope you're right!  You know a lot more about this than me, but I'm just thinking:  Is the JTA making such a monumental decision here that the process needs to be attacked as much as the BRT?  Did the BJP specifically cede the decision as to routing and the form of transport solely to appointed members (of the JTA)?  Wasn't the BJP - itself founded and confirming the importance of public voting - only about setting aside funds and beginning a process for developing mass transportation?  Is having occassional meetings with some time allotted for questions and comments from the public that could attend the meetings a sufficient democratic process? Isn't it the standard practice in other metro communities for there to be referendums on the type of mass transit to be implemented (to me that seems to be clearly the case)?  Is it within the spirit of the city charter for a decision that has such massive demographic and transportation ramifications to be made in the fashion we are seeing?

It would be great to halt the process (legal analysis?) and get a well crafted referendum question to the public.  I do trust the public, but I trust neither the JTA nor the administration.  As early as the purchase of right of way (i.e., alongside interstates - how do you get rid of that to recover funds?), we're going to be past the point of no return.  I do think working expeditiously is of utmost importance at this point. 

Be gentle in your responses - just my novice thoughts and observations.   

dejumoshi

code for embedding rail documentary into web pages:

<object width="522" height="288" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,19,0"> <param name="salign" value="lt"> <param name="quality" value="high">   <param name="scale" value="noscale"> <param name="wmode" value="transparent"> <param name="movie" value="http://geekfile.googlepages.com/flvplay.swf"> <param name="FlashVars" value="&streamName=http://media.metrojacksonville.com/videos/transit_documentary.flv&skinName=http://geekfile.googlepages.com/flvskin&autoPlay=false&autoRewind=true">  <embed width="522" height="288" flashvars="&streamName=http://media.metrojacksonville.com/videos/transit_documentary.flv&autoPlay=false&autoRewind=true&skinName=http://geekfile.googlepages.com/flvskin" quality="high" scale="noscale" salign="LT" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" src="http://geekfile.googlepages.com/flvplay.swf" wmode="transparent"> </embed></object>

WitchDoctor

#43
Not to detract from the excellent video presentation, but look what was on Jacksonville.com today:

Water buses?

I think they are an idea, but just as much of a novelty as the PCT "trolley".