Metro Jacksonville

Urban Thinking => Analysis => Topic started by: Metro Jacksonville on June 25, 2010, 04:01:41 AM

Title: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: Metro Jacksonville on June 25, 2010, 04:01:41 AM
Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks

(http://photos.metrojacksonville.com/photos/825353621_GCEFs-M.jpg)

14 ways to build out innovative parks in crowded cities by Peter Harnik, director, Center for City Park Excellence at the Trust for Public Land and author of "Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities.


Full Article
http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2010-jun-revitalizing-cities-with-innovative-parks
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: finehoe on June 25, 2010, 10:03:41 AM
I visited NY's High Line for the first time on Monday.  What a great example of adaptive re-use!  I have pictures on flickr, but for some reason they won't show up when I try to post them on MJ.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: finehoe on June 25, 2010, 10:57:20 AM
Stephen, when I do that, this is what I get: (http://www.flickr.com/photos/28958854@N03/4725589529)
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: Fallen Buckeye on June 25, 2010, 12:05:05 PM
I think part of our problem with having school yards double as parks has to do with securing the buildings and liability. Who pays the extra insurance premium? Though personally I wish they were opened up as parks. Might help keep some kids out of trouble and encourage them to exercise a little. Anyone else see that TU article Wednesday about fighting childhood obsesity? That was one of the recommendations made.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: kellypope on June 25, 2010, 01:21:01 PM
There was an attempt in 2004ish to turn the "wasted space" of LaVilla SOTA into an outdoor classroom. I distinctly remember compost bins and planting flowers.  I'm not sure on the details but I'm guessing there was an issue between administration and the faculty members advocating it. That doesn't mean it was intended to be a public park, but it did have potential for interactive real-world science education, which our schools do need more of.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: north miami on June 25, 2010, 03:19:06 PM


With the ShipYards back in the hands of the public I am thinking at an innovative angle..........OPEN SPACE
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: Fallen Buckeye on June 25, 2010, 05:19:22 PM
Quote from: north miami on June 25, 2010, 03:19:06 PM


With the ShipYards back in the hands of the public I am thinking at an innovative angle..........OPEN SPACE

In some cities, they take empty space that they want to develop in the future and use it as temporary park space that will later be developed. That makes it at least have the appearance that the city is purposely empty instead of a shell of a city full of empty lots. The lots can get some use from thes empty spaces. That might be a good use for the Shipyards until the market comes back.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: finehoe on June 25, 2010, 06:17:08 PM
Pictures of the High Line:
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1138/4725587455_f7b3ff4274.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1112/4725587599_9150f0b84c.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1166/4726234512_68e8c34e63.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1030/4725587945_76b0662904.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1416/4726234888_c245df32fd.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1346/4725589257_71a9e7bdd6.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1063/4725589905_2da7520208.jpg)
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1381/4725590579_8cb679ff9e.jpg)
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: stjr on June 25, 2010, 07:05:36 PM
Quote from: finehoe on June 25, 2010, 10:03:41 AM
I visited NY's High Line for the first time on Monday.  What a great example of adaptive re-use!  

Finehoe, I saw this a few months ago, as well, and brought it up as a possible use for the Skyway should it someday be abandoned!   You can imagine the love I received for that idea.  ;D

See: Post #29, http://www.metrojacksonville.com/forum/index.php/topic,8672.15.html
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: Noone on June 27, 2010, 08:20:33 AM
Quote from: north miami on June 25, 2010, 03:19:06 PM


With the ShipYards back in the hands of the public I am thinking at an innovative angle..........OPEN SPACE

An innovative angle. That is why it should be a city wide city council and mayoral campaign issue. Sipyards was 16 acres of Public Space. It was reduced to 8 acres with Landmar. Now because of bankruptcy the people of Jacksonville will be getting back 44 acres.

In my opinion focus on the 680' Public Pier. We are a Port city. 14 Ports in the state of Florida. By using a container to operate a business out of you will immediately create a buzz throughout the state and everywhere else if its not being done already.

The Pier is in Dist.7. Councilman Gaffney is aware of the issue as well as the administration. Councilman Gaffney is still deciding if he will introduce a resolution that can be taken to the Jacksonville Waterways Commission and then back before the city council for a vote up or down on this opportunity. After the council break he should be making a decision.

The district councilman has the ball and everyone is waiting to see what he will do with it.

The Pier will allow everyone via the Waterway to access the .....OPEN SPACE 
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: stjr on June 27, 2010, 05:14:14 PM
Quote from: north miami on June 25, 2010, 03:19:06 PM
With the ShipYards back in the hands of the public I am thinking at an innovative angle..........OPEN SPACE

North Miami, you have my vote!  See this thread from early 2009:  http://www.metrojacksonville.com/forum/index.php/topic,4434.0.html
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: kellypope on June 27, 2010, 07:57:25 PM
Edible parks--fruit and nut trees and shrubs!
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: finehoe on July 14, 2010, 01:35:33 PM
"After High Line’s Success, Other Cities Look Up"

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/arts/design/15highline.html?_r=1&hpw
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: stjr on July 14, 2010, 10:33:50 PM
Quote from: finehoe on July 14, 2010, 01:35:33 PM
"After High Line’s Success, Other Cities Look Up"

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/15/arts/design/15highline.html?_r=1&hpw

Do you think anyone in Jax leadership is reading or listening?  Some evidence of inspiration like this would be great to see here.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: CS Foltz on July 27, 2010, 03:18:29 PM
stjr.............judging from our leadership, I am not sure any of them can read or have reading comprehension skills! But they sure can plan or tell the public what we need since we can't think for ourselves! Idiots!
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: simms3 on July 27, 2010, 04:05:46 PM
I intern for someone who is a big proponent of the High Line.  While a great idea and a wonderful asset to any city that has the old infrastructure to work with, the High Line cost over $150 Million.  I am not sure if something similar would cost as much in Jax, but the price seemed pretty steep to me for the result.  I suppose these ideas can at least spur some private philanthropists in Jax to think outside the box, and actually, many do.  Where we lack is where we all agree: city leadership.
Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: finehoe on November 17, 2010, 10:16:28 AM
QuoteIn West Chelsea, a High Line Boomlet

By SARAH KERSHAW

The view of West Chelsea from the roof of 540 West 28th Street, a new condominium at 11th Avenue, prompts a somewhat irrational question: what housing crash?

All around, construction is buzzing and the landscape is filling up with new buildings and warehouse conversions, funky and sleek condominiums, hotels, galleries and public spaces designed by big-name architects like Frank Gehry, Jean Nouvel, Richard Meier and Annabelle Selldorf. And other projects once trapped in limbo by the mortgage and construction financing crises are moving ahead.

In the last four years, 27 residential projects have come on the market in West Chelsea, a submarket of Chelsea that runs from 14th to 30th Street, west of Ninth Avenue, according to an analysis by Streeteasy.com. A building boomlet that began a decade ago intensified after the rezoning for residential use of a 15-block area and the beginning phases of the High Line park.

Many of these properties struggled after the collapse of Lehman Brothers two years ago. But the market is coming back, developers and brokers say â€" through a combination of timing (the opening of the popular High Line), chic (art galleries) and edginess (the rezoning of an industrial area).

West Chelsea’s growth came during a period of almost unheard-of building development citywide. In 2007, for example, 25,659 new units were completed. But in 2009 building permits â€" a measure of future building activity â€" fell by 90 percent, to 3,275 from 30,947 in 2008, and the decline has persisted in 2010, according to data compiled by the Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy at New York University.

A relative lack of inventory in Chelsea is also sustaining demand in West Chelsea. There are 126 available units in Chelsea as a whole, from 14th Street to 30th Street, west of Fifth Avenue, according to Halstead Property. That is three more than were available last May.

But even in West Chelsea, there are pockets of hot and cold. The High Line will eventually run from Gansevoort Street to 34th Street. The first segment, stretching to 20th Street, is open. The second, extending to 30th Street, is expected to open next spring, and likely to have a similar effect on apartments in that area.

At 540 West 28th Street, a 12-story building called +aRt, developers have so far had a hard time selling condos. Preconstruction sales of the 91 units began in September 2008, but sales were suspended from December 2008 until last May.

Since the units at +aRt â€" half a block from the 28th Street High Line entrance â€" recently returned to the market, with prices from $500,000 to $2.3 million, about 20 percent of them have sold, though most for 10 to 15 percent below asking prices.

Across 28th Street, AvalonBay Communities, a national developer, had signed a 99-year lease on about 60,000 square feet of land in 2007. A rental building with 600 to 700 units had been planned but stalled, although according to someone with knowledge of the plans who was not authorized to speak publicly, ground-breaking is anticipated for the middle of 2011.

Erik T. Ekstein, the principal of Ekstein Development and one of the developers of +aRt, said he was encouraged by the current pace of sales and did not regret setting his sights on West Chelsea. The first buyers are moving into the building this week, he said, and he is also developing a 30-unit rental building at 537 West 27th Street.

“We saw what was coming north, we saw the High Line coming, we saw the art galleries,” said Mr. Ekstein, who has also developed properties in TriBeCa and in Long Island City, Queens.

Among the first developers to march into West Chelsea in the last 10 years was Cary Tamarkin, the architect and the developer of 456 West 19th Street, where 16 of 22 duplexes, ranging in price from $1.5 million to $7.9 million, are in contract or closed. Mr. Tamarkin focused his marketing efforts on the proliferation of art galleries and exhibits of globally acclaimed painters and sculptors.

“Art was huge,” Mr. Tamarkin said. “It was the whole tag line of our building,” which is modeled after artist studios of the early 20th century.

“When we first started thinking about this four years ago,” he said, “the High Line was just kind of a dream and the area was scary; it had a scary component to it at night. But it has just flourished on a straight line up from that moment.”

He also designed and developed a building at 491-495 West Street in the West Village. But he said, “The West Village remains great, but it’s, like, done. It’s like living in the suburbs. It’s not edgy.”

While the art district always had cachet, art alone was not enough to sell West Chelsea, said Leonard Steinberg, a broker with Prudential Douglas Elliman who specializes in West Chelsea.

But then came the High Line, the elevated park that is, in phases, transforming an old trestle that snakes through the West Side of Manhattan into a tourist attraction. “Having an art gallery on your street doesn’t necessarily imply quality of life,” Mr. Steinberg said. “Art galleries are the first indicators of a turning neighborhood, but what’s happening now in West Chelsea is the perfect storm.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/14/realestate/14deal1.html?_r=1&hp

Title: Re: Revitalizing Cities with Innovative Parks
Post by: stjr on December 24, 2010, 07:36:00 PM
Imagine, an elevated park and art galleries stimulating billions in investment.  Looks like the $100 million plus invested in the High Line is paying off.  Does anyone in Jax ever think like this?  Until someone does, we will persist with downtown issues.