Metro Jacksonville

Jacksonville by Neighborhood => Urban Neighborhoods => Springfield => Topic started by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 03:40:43 PM

Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 03:40:43 PM
Being that the Zombie thread is locked I would like to point out I was falsley accused of calling Kathy scum. Please reread the thread and you will see I didn't say that. I do enough to get in trouble, please don't make stuff up.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: samiam on February 05, 2010, 04:53:24 PM
I just want to clear this up. I made the statement about Kathy after she made a racial remark. I do not judge anyone by there skin color but by action and attitude.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: AlexS on February 05, 2010, 04:57:18 PM
Quote from: samiam on February 05, 2010, 04:53:24 PM
I just want to clear this up. I made the statement about Kathy after she made a racial remark. I do not judge anyone by there skin color but by action and attitude.
I think the statement was inappropriate no matter what triggered it.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Ocklawaha on February 05, 2010, 05:15:55 PM
After SPAR?

10 long years of occupation and reconstruction...

Beware of carpetbagger wearing RAPS lapel pins!



OCKLAWAHA
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Dan B on February 05, 2010, 05:36:57 PM
Quote from: AlexS on February 05, 2010, 04:57:18 PM
Quote from: samiam on February 05, 2010, 04:53:24 PM
I just want to clear this up. I made the statement about Kathy after she made a racial remark. I do not judge anyone by there skin color but by action and attitude.
I think the statement was inappropriate no matter what triggered it.

Which statement? Stephens (Kathy) or someone elses?
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: AlexS on February 05, 2010, 05:39:22 PM
Quote from: Dan B on February 05, 2010, 05:36:57 PM
Which statement? Stephens (Kathy) or someone elses?
The one calling someone SCUM.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: samiam on February 05, 2010, 05:47:56 PM
From what I understand Kathy is an alter ego of another forum member. Someone using an alter ego so they can make racial remarks is childish at best. Yes I over reacted and I apologize for that.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: nvrenuf on February 05, 2010, 07:01:43 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 05:59:09 PM
Check out Kathy's facebook page yourself.

I hope you aren't seriously suggesting that Facebook should be used to determine if a person is real or not. All it guarantees is a valid email address.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:06:04 PM
This site is really going downhill fast.  A bunch of false accusations go unchecked but if you ask someone a question, you get your post removed.  And threads get locked the minute a discussion goes against one of the main posters on here. 
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:10:19 PM
ahhhh...downhill....uphill....it is the nature of spirited discussions.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:10:45 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:08:46 PM
The site is just fine, thanks.  The Springfield posters are just simply over the top.


You have the option of simply not posting or reading the threads, dave.

Thanks for stating the obvious about my options Stephen, I couldn't figure that one out.  So you are saying you aren't over the top? LOL.  Tons of douchebaggery going on in here to go around :)
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:11:39 PM
Quote from: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:10:19 PM
ahhhh...downhill....uphill....it is the nature of spirited discussions.

downhill is in reference to the one sided censorship.  Of course you wouldn't know what that is about since you are one of Stephens clones.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:12:57 PM
But, I was just censored last night....twice matter of fact.  My posts will pulled. 
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:13:37 PM
Stephen is by far more entertaining than I am.  As a clone, I didn't receive his flair for the dramatic, the sarcastic ...perhaps.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:14:14 PM
Quote from: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:12:57 PM
But, I was just censored last night....twice matter of fact.  My posts will pulled. 

Wow that is good news to hear that it happens to both sides...I apologize.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:15:10 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:13:46 PM
that kind of personal remark is against our rules, steno.

And no, im not over the top of our rules.  There is a difference between flamboyance and hurtful, and the censorship is hardly onesided.

My posts have been deleted a number of times as well.

What is against the rules stephen? I can call people names that start with ass though right? I mean you get away from it.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:15:48 PM
Hey, I'm okay with that.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: nvrenuf on February 05, 2010, 07:29:14 PM
New word of the day kiddies - relevance. If you don't understand, that's okay, just me being hysterical and weird.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: nvrenuf on February 05, 2010, 07:36:49 PM
Quote from: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 07:13:37 PM
Stephen is by far more entertaining than I am.  As a clone, I didn't receive his flair for the dramatic, the sarcastic ...perhaps.

I assure you StenoDave that sheclown is a true and really fine damn person. But then you don't know me so maybe I can't be trusted.
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 07:39:17 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:13:46 PM
that kind of personal remark is against our rules, steno.

And no, im not over the top of our rules.  There is a difference between flamboyance and hurtful, and the censorship is hardly onesided.

My posts have been deleted a number of times as well.
group of never happy sabotuers thickskulled, unprofessional and counterproductive train of thought sockpuppets close minded tyrant trying to run a fiefdom, not a team player and someone who needs 'a fire lit under' him. she a meddlesome witch who needs to be put in her place.What a bunch of pigs bunch of empty, far blown rhetoric you are
fsu813.
Id argue with you, but I think you are just dumb. I used to think it was because your age meant that you didnt have enough experience to know what you are talking about, but now I know that it wouldnt really matter how old you were.
When you make it to 30, I think you will still be dumb.
At 40. Still dumb.
by 50, provided you havent walked in front of an omnibus, I predict: No Change.
FSU813 is an incredibly destructive little monster for Springfield, I think.
The Women's Club is opening a community center and our 27 year old little would be snob is turning that into a poopstained controversy over on myspringfieldforums.org as well Matt McVay, how dare you...you vapid little dick motherless son of a cow, lower class assknob, elitist, snobby Sparbarian, you're comments are assinine and your arguments are idiotic, quit posting on here
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 07:46:11 PM
got them all from this forum.  of course in the truest hit and run fashion, they are later "edited" and they are not quotes from others. 
Title: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 07:48:39 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:43:39 PM
Cindi.  You need to review your list.  Most of them were made on other forums, and half of them were actually quoting other peoples remarks.

The remaining few were in direct response to posters calling names or accusing other posters of breaking the actual laws of the land.

And I stick by everyone of them.

Calling someone dumb is a different order than calling someone SCUM, Im sure you agree.
and how in the world would "you vapid little dick" or "motherless son of a cow" be any less offensive than SCUM? fyi - that question is retorical.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 08:03:45 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:48:51 PM
Um.  no you didnt.  Motherless son of a cow came from the SPAR Board, not here, and it was in response to the suggestion that I was actually a criminal.  Meddlesome witch was a quote from a former poster, as was 'someone who needed a fire lit' ( a pretty direct paraphrase of Louise DeSPains letter about Joel McEachin), you need to review it, if you are going to continually post it.  Jeremy, the assistant twink over at SPAR also called me a liar over an incident caused by himself that he later had to admit had never happened.  In any case, the comment was deleted, which is the complaint here.  I broke our rule, and as a result the comment was deleted.  Not a very good example to keep including in you little list.

i think it is a maaavaloous example since it comes from someone of such high moral fiber, and is always above the rest, one to be emulated if you would i would think your stellar behavior would extend to all the forums that you may visit.
ok, so exclude those few, really, the rest were okey dokey?  tisk tisk tisk.  i thought you would have already heard, i am NOT a good example.  remember i am the one that the spar moral elitist banned from the forum.  
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:16:14 PM
stephendare.........I concur! I don't have to take much of anything, but keyboards can not hurt me! Unless it is across the forehead and then it would just irritate me and I would be putting a keyboard up someones rectal vent! Certain lines should not be crossed no matter what!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 08:22:10 PM
oops. p.s., if my last post had any questions in it they were also rhetorical.  in case you don't realize it, i have ADD, so that long manifesto was lost on me after "well if you are asking me".  please keep any post directed to me short, and use only small words. 
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:25:16 PM
ADD....huh? You used "SPAR moral elitist"...........I am still laughing!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 08:31:09 PM
Quote from: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:25:16 PM
ADD....huh? You used "SPAR moral elitist"...........I am still laughing!
there must not be much in the form of entertainment over there in the lost missing link subdivision.  perhaps you need us to send some of ours your way.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hV-r19UwbIU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rnJkKfpSAU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIavmPbO5SI
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=jaxmovies#p/u/5/GK4y_sxA10E
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=jaxmovies#p/u/9/IhFIwP1gX9c
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=jaxmovies#p/u/10/doEsRFGo4wo
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:40:50 PM
Good grief cindi! Little do you know............got Bay Meadows Inn right up the road and supposedly that is a den of ill repute! Not quite as much fun as the races on 8th with the Ninja's & Dogs and all of the corner people! That was almost as much fun......but hay I just got struck by a thought - Maybe we can arrange a trade? I'll send some your way and you send some my way........might be willing to go two for one if the moon is full?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 08:42:52 PM
Thanks Never.  Btw, I think you are wonderfully clever.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 08:45:28 PM
actually i was just thinking, since you and yours over there in missing weakest land pay for all of our jso over here, think you could talk to them about maybe instead of playing slap and tickle with the hookers when he/she bares the wares they might actually think about at least writing a ticket or something - just see what you can do for us poor peeps over here in hampsterdam.  
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 08:45:58 PM
QuoteThe SCUM Manifesto (Society For Cutting Up Men) is a feminist tract written in 1968 by Valerie Solanas that calls for the gendercide of men. After being put in the spotlight for shooting Andy Warhol, Valerie Solanas later claimed that her writing was a satirical literary device[1][2] to elicit debate.[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 08:50:45 PM
Perhaps that "satirical literary device to elicit debate" worked here as well.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:56:41 PM
Awwww shucks! sheclown one of these days our paths will cross, I guarentee it...........cindi , I got no more pull with JSO then you do, but you have something I don't...........you have a Council person who represents you so start bugging the hell out of them until JSO starts showing up and doing something! E Mail......phone call.....I would not let that bugger have any rest until! District 13's representative, John Meserve, was removed by Charlie Crist and that dip stick has not seen fit to name a replacement! So you have something I don't have, representation on the Council kid.............talk about being hung out!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 09:11:52 PM
Quote from: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 08:56:41 PM
Awwww shucks! sheclown one of these days our paths will cross, I guarentee it...........cindi , I got no more pull with JSO then you do, but you have something I don't...........you have a Council person who represents you so start bugging the hell out of them until JSO starts showing up and doing something! E Mail......phone call.....I would not let that bugger have any rest until! District 13's representative, John Meserve, was removed by Charlie Crist and that dip stick has not seen fit to name a replacement! So you have something I don't have, representation on the Council kid.............talk about being hung out!
really? we are suppose to call jso? trust me, we have called, we have written, we have gone to shadco meetings, we have emailed.  cliffnote version - you moved to da hood, now live with it.  queens harbor (my fave as far as neighborhoods to be compared to) has just as many hookers (seriously, that's what we were told at a shadco meeting, can't make this crap up) they are just better looking (which we took great offense to, as heho's go, we got it going on).  you can't video tape them if they are on a public right of way (again, can't make this crap up).  if you walk on the sidewalk in front of flagship apartments, they (the hehos living there at the time) might feel threatened and would be justified to shoot.  in order to look for a perp (not perv, those are different requirements) you must know their legal name and date of birth.  and the most fitting for the youtube video - drum roll please - "we can't arrest them if we don't see them doing it" (regarding the exposing themselves in the roads etc.- let's hope the officer's seeing eye dog was driving the cruiser because he himself must be blind as a bat.  oh, and the "dispatch doesn't have caller ID" (go ahead call from your cell and give your home number and see how fast they can tell you without that magic of caller ID, that you have called from a different number.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 09:21:10 PM
cindi..........you misunderstand kid! You have a Council representative on the City Council! Someone represents your part of the world! I would not be calling JSO, unless it is 911 situation, I would be calling and E Mailing your representative! That is their job to represent the people who voted them into office! Now whether or not you voted for them does not matter..........they represent whatever district you are in! So start bugging them....go the coj.net site for the City of Jacksonville and find out who your representative is, if you don't know already, and bug the ever loving heck out of them until they put a fire under JSO's butt and you get something done about the problem! If you don't raise hell, the situation will not change.........so get on them whoever they are!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 05, 2010, 09:28:33 PM
ah, but you see, we are told to call, call, call, the more calls generated, the more love you get.  we do use the non-emergency number.  and yes, i know who my rep is - i have visuals of nailing jello to a tree.  teets on a boar hog. soup sandwich. football bat.  i think you get the idea.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 09:42:27 PM
Maybe you need to treat them like a mule..........you know 2 x 4 between the eyes to get their attention! If they are not term limited, they will want to run again so make your views known! Maybe a collective add in the TU about how good they represent their voters or maybe a Bill Board for 30 Days might not be too expensive! There is strength in numbers for sure but call, call, call your rep! I would become the biggest pain in the butt that sucker has ever seen and all of my neighborhood included! The more the merrier, untill you wear that non-performing sucker out and they do their job!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 05, 2010, 09:55:54 PM
Foltz, crime in Springfield is rather complicated.  Back 10 years ago, 5th and Market was the center of the universe for male prostitution in drag.

Then that block became SRG's Glory Block and the prostitutes were "displaced" out of this area, and over to Cindi's side of Springfield.

Cindi , we just need to find them a "foster neighborhood".  Perhaps we could do a fund raiser for financial incentives? 



Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 10:05:28 PM
Should have seen it 20 years ago when I first showed up around here! My missus was horrified.....but that was then and this is now! I think you might be on to something......as in "foster neighborhood". Only problem might be finding an area that would be willing to accept them.......so you might have to convert them! Or you might have to start spreading the word about an affliction that they have that drugs don't cure?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Ocklawaha on February 05, 2010, 10:19:28 PM
Quote from: Stenodave on February 05, 2010, 07:06:04 PM
This site is really going downhill fast.  A bunch of false accusations go unchecked but if you ask someone a question, you get your post removed.  And threads get locked the minute a discussion goes against one of the main posters on here. 


Anytime foul, racial or off color stuff is brought to our attention, we go in and try and weed it out. It keeps about 7 of us busy in our spare time, round the clock. Even with our best efforts threads will spin out of control and something checked just 30 minutes ago, has run on into a slaughter fest of name calling with dozens of posts. When this happens our best defense is just to shut it down. Note that I said shut IT down, and not shut YOU down... Stephendare like anyone else has to report it to us for our consideration, he has no magic button to make your statements vanish, which means he debates with you or anyone else on an even field.


Quote from: CS Foltz on February 05, 2010, 09:42:27 PM
Maybe you need to treat them like a mule..........you know 2 x 4 between the eyes to get their attention! If they are not term limited, they will want to run again so make your views known! Maybe a collective add in the TU about how good they represent their voters or maybe a Bill Board for 30 Days might not be too expensive! There is strength in numbers for sure but call, call, call your rep! I would become the biggest pain in the butt that sucker has ever seen and all of my neighborhood included! The more the merrier, untill you wear that non-performing sucker out and they do their job!

CS that isn't how it is done with mules! Thought you were old enough to know that one? If we want to tackle the male HO problem in town like one handles mules, a bit of instruction is due:

When a mule fails to pull it's load on a double team rig, there is only one sure cure. First a "kicking strap" must be rigged to prevent said animal from kicking while in harness. Next A rather rough board must be affixed to the rear of the harness with several nasty long nails or small spikes pointed in the general direction of the mules posterior.
While the good mules pulls and the lazy mule falls back it will poke itself in the rump with the spikes and bolt ahead quickly learning it's place in the animal team.

So it seems to me we need to round up the male hookers, and someone bring the kicking straps... I'm leaving the rest up to y'all!




OCKLAWAHA
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 06, 2010, 09:45:34 AM
Your right Ock...........forgot all about that one and come to think on it, might be the corrective action to take! I also agree with the MJ Board on how to regulate the discussion posts..............gotta have discussion to come to a conclusion and when it gets out of hand, there is not much choice but to shut the thread down! I have to say though, I don't see any better way to control things!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: BridgeTroll on February 06, 2010, 10:35:24 AM
QuoteAnytime foul, racial or off color stuff is brought to our attention, we go in and try and weed it out. It keeps about 7 of us busy in our spare time, round the clock. Even with our best efforts threads will spin out of control and something checked just 30 minutes ago, has run on into a slaughter fest of name calling with dozens of posts. When this happens our best defense is just to shut it down. Note that I said shut IT down, and not shut YOU down...

MJ prides itself on being part of the solution... whatever the percieved problem may be.  It is about ideas and solutions.  Unproductive bickering and personal attacks and race baiting can be found on virtually any thread on the TU site.

All we ask as moderators is civility and a genuine attempt to seek out new ideas and find solutions to our cities problems. :)
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: finehoe on February 06, 2010, 11:14:46 PM
Quote from: Ocklawaha on February 05, 2010, 10:19:28 PM
CS that isn't how it is done with mules!

I believe the 2x4 was to be directed to the Council representative, not the ho's.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Ocklawaha on February 07, 2010, 12:22:13 AM
Quote from: finehoe on February 06, 2010, 11:14:46 PM
Quote from: Ocklawaha on February 05, 2010, 10:19:28 PM
CS that isn't how it is done with mules!

I believe the 2x4 was to be directed to the Council representative, not the ho's.

Quote from: Ocklawaha on February 05, 2010, 10:19:28 PM
So it seems to me we need to round up the male hookers, and someone bring the kicking straps... I'm leaving the rest up to y'all!

finehoe, THEM TOO!

OCKLAWAHA ;D
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 07, 2010, 08:22:49 AM
finehoe............you are correct! To me, there is not something much more depressing that having your elected representative ignore their constituents! That is their job, that is why they are there and why they got elected in the first place! Council representation is critical to correct any situation involving flesh markets and/or drugs along with JSO participation! Now I know all about prioritizing and do agree, but if crime is down, and supposedly it is according to the Sheriff, why can we not allocate some resources to this particular problem? Why has not the Council representative taken it upon themself to at least try to correct the situation? If it was my world, their phone would not stop ringing and their E Mail in box would fill up to capacity............after all we pay for their phone and the E Mail Box so do your job! Instead of just a block  or two, organize awhole lot more.....get with some of the owners on Main Street and ask about leaving a petition or a log in sheet regarding the situation and start getting some signatures........4 or 500 should get some attention and give them a time range to produce...........if they don't start calling the TU and local news..........they allways like that kinda of stuff! Make sure you include your lack of responce from your Rep and JSO!
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: chris farley on February 07, 2010, 11:35:57 AM
Cindi I am hoping that the extra police funding under Weed and Seed will take care of the situation with which you have to live at this time.  I was secretary to the steering committee but, now they seek committee chairs as the attempt at getting this area designated as a Weed and Seed fund recipient was successful.  If you wish I will give you contacts but they are no secret I just don't care for putting people's names on these blogs.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: uptowngirl on February 07, 2010, 04:19:30 PM
Chris,. I hope that money is for more VICE officers instead of just more patrol....either that or we need to work with the department to get patrol able to arrest dealers and hookers.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: cindi on February 07, 2010, 04:25:32 PM
Quote from: uptowngirl on February 07, 2010, 04:19:30 PM
Chris,. I hope that money is for more VICE officers instead of just more patrol....either that or we need to work with the department to get patrol able to arrest dealers and hookers.

EXACTLY. otherwise it's like having a batttalion of barney fife's without any bullets.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: chris farley on February 07, 2010, 11:12:25 PM
Actually I understood - apart from more money for police, any arrests in the area would fall under a much stricter system of laws and the revolving door attitude should change.  At the moment the police can arrest and then what happens?  The perps and the street walkers know that the way the present arrest system works (so what if they spend the night in jail) feeds barney fife without bullets.  (I hope I got that name right)
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CityLife on February 08, 2010, 03:21:21 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 05, 2010, 07:48:51 PM
Um.  no you didnt.  Motherless son of a cow came from the SPAR Board, not here, and it was in response to the suggestion that I was actually a criminal.  Meddlesome witch was a quote from a former poster, as was 'someone who needed a fire lit' ( a pretty direct paraphrase of Louise DeSPains letter about Joel McEachin), you need to review it, if you are going to continually post it.  Jeremy, the assistant twink over at SPAR also called me a liar over an incident caused by himself that he later had to admit had never happened.  In any case, the comment was deleted, which is the complaint here.  I broke our rule, and as a result the comment was deleted.  Not a very good example to keep including in you little list.


I am not an assistant and I never admitted that the incident didn't happen. I simply wanted to stop wasting my time dealing with you.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Dan B on February 08, 2010, 03:28:17 PM
So the "no personal attacks" rule we keep hearing about must not really be a "rule", so much as a suggestion?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CS Foltz on February 08, 2010, 03:30:02 PM
[quote author=CityLife link=topic=7475.msg130618#msg130618 date=1265660481



I am not an assistant and I never admitted that the incident didn't happen. I simply wanted to stop wasting my time dealing with you.
[/quote] Funny how they want to stop wasting their time................but have no problem making a comment, even though its wasting their time ya know?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Dan B on February 08, 2010, 03:34:29 PM
Really? Like?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CityLife on February 08, 2010, 03:41:02 PM
Quote from: CS Foltz on February 08, 2010, 03:30:02 PM
[quote author=CityLife link=topic=7475.msg130618#msg130618 date=1265660481



I am not an assistant and I never admitted that the incident didn't happen. I simply wanted to stop wasting my time dealing with you.
Funny how they want to stop wasting their time................but have no problem making a comment, even though its wasting their time ya know?
[/quote]

Irony it is not. Stephen and I exchanged numerous private messages and I just wanted to stop wasting time with the back and forth with him.

Not quite similar to posting a one sentence clarification....
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: CityLife on February 08, 2010, 03:42:46 PM
Quote from: stephendare on February 08, 2010, 03:40:36 PM
Lol.  Which is why you are one of the few others that had to change a screen name.  It used to be jth or something like that I believe.

Anyways, please resume.  East bound and Down, 18 wheels a rollin'!

I changed my name because I wanted a non-generic name. If i was in anyway embarrassed I wouldn't have admitted who I am with this new one.

Call me Jerry Garcia....
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: uptowngirl on February 08, 2010, 04:10:47 PM
Spit, foul language, spit ...Oh OK I am on it now.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: samiam on February 08, 2010, 04:11:26 PM
LOL stephendare
Smokey and the bandit sure brings back memory's. Most of that movie was filmed around were I grew up in Clayton county Ga. I use to fish off that bridge as a kid (Old flint river bridge) as well as the lake they jumped into (Mondays mill lake) I went to Mondays mill JR High. On the way to school we saw all the stunt cars and the truck as well as sally fields walking down the road in a wedding dress. Thank you
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: sheclown on February 08, 2010, 09:08:54 PM
Jerry Reed was HOT.
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: uptowngirl on February 09, 2010, 06:57:34 PM
Quote from: sheclown on February 08, 2010, 09:08:54 PM
Jerry Reed was HOT.


Would I be banned for saying "ewwwwwwww!!!!!!!" ?
Title: Re: Remarks Explained.
Post by: Sportmotor on February 09, 2010, 07:36:32 PM
Quote from: Dan B on February 08, 2010, 03:28:17 PM
So the "no personal attacks" rule we keep hearing about must not really be a "rule", so much as a suggestion?

its only a rule if you go against certine people then its just a suggestion if they do it.