Metro Jacksonville

Jacksonville by Neighborhood => Urban Neighborhoods => Springfield => Topic started by: JaxByDefault on November 22, 2008, 01:24:17 PM

Title: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 22, 2008, 01:24:17 PM
This thread for members of the community to share questions for the SPAR Board Question & Answer Session on December 4th at 7PM at the SPAR building.

I encourage members to post, critique, and refine questions. The goal is to ask direct and detailed questions that will get the answers most sought by SPAR members and Springfield residents.  Let's eschew rumor and speculation for good fact-finding.

Numbering posted questions sequentially through all posts will aid member discussion.

Civil tone is mandatory.

Remember that SPAR has set a deadline for written questions: please submit them in writing to sparoffice@sparcouncil.org before close of business on Monday December 1st. FinnegansWake will be collecting questions posted on this thread and submitting them to the SPAR board by the deadline.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: strider on November 22, 2008, 07:12:15 PM
OK, so - let me begin with:

1) Why has a group of elected and appointed board members, mostly the executive and Governance committee, held a hostile take over of SPAR Council?

2) Why did a non-profit that is supposed to represent this entire community force a particular board member, the only one that seems to 1) Want to follow the by-laws, 2) listen to the the entire community and 3) bring accurate and public information to that community, off of the board?  What gives them, in particular, Jack Meeks, the right to do that?


Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 22, 2008, 07:42:18 PM

3) If the changes in the leadership structure were suggested by LISC, what prevented informing the membership of LISC's recommendations, the needed changes, and then calling a special election or having a membership meeting to reorganize the board?

4)What is SPAR doing to improve their relationships with existing business owners in the area?

5) How exactly will the LISC grants be used? Will any of the money go to existing business owners to fix or paint their properties? Will any be used as start up grants for new businesses? Please explain how the LISC funds will be used to promote the opening of 10 new businesses as is stated in the goals for next year.

6) The LISC grant is a matching fund. How much does SPAR currently need to raise, and by what deadline, to obtain the full grant from LISC?

7) Bus Rapid Transit is coming to Boulevard. What is SPAR's position on this proposition by JTA?

8 ) What is SPAR's position on public transit in Jacksonville? Does SPAR currently endorse a transit plan (JTS's BRT, the MetroJacksonville Commuter Rail Plan, etc.)?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: jbm32206 on November 22, 2008, 07:44:08 PM
excellent questions
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 22, 2008, 08:08:56 PM
[9]* What is SPAR's plan to ensure racial and socio-economic prejudice will not become prevalent during the Commerical Corridor's Revitalization?

*Moderator added numbering in[]; no post content changed.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 22, 2008, 08:21:32 PM
Question 9 gets to a key problem with the perceived outlook of SPAR. I hope they answer it.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: jbm32206 on November 22, 2008, 08:26:39 PM
10. Why did the board not notify the community of positions that need to be filled?
11. Why were there no elections?
12. Why is the governance committee made up of only board members?
13. When and how will those open positions be made public, and how would the governance committee decide who meets the requirements of said open position?
14. What positions have expired and when?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 23, 2008, 07:30:50 AM
15.  Why is SPAR in such financial trouble? 
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: 02roadking on November 23, 2008, 08:07:02 AM
 #16   Has SPAR had a hand in saving any historic structures from demolition in the last 5 years? If yes,
             where and how was it accomplished?
   
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 23, 2008, 08:44:47 AM
17.) What is SPAR's plan to save the remaining historic structures from demolition and neglect?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: strider on November 23, 2008, 09:09:47 AM
18) What is SPAR Council's plan to insure future transparency in it's own decision making process as well as it’s dealing with JSO, the developers and the city?

19)  Are the minutes to every board meeting, the voting details and even the “minutes” from the special “e-mail” votes going to be readily made public?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: deportman on November 23, 2008, 09:26:31 AM
20)   It was stated somewhere that LISC moneys will match any donations provide for some sort of development, if so who will audit the transactions, is there an application process where a record will be kept for everyone to see who received or who was denied and why.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: jbm32206 on November 23, 2008, 09:31:19 AM
21. Will the neighborhood have input as to what and where that money will be utilized?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 23, 2008, 09:48:36 AM
Quote from: deportman on November 23, 2008, 09:26:31 AM
20)   It was stated somewhere that LISC moneys will match any donations provide for some sort of development, if so who will audit the transactions, is there an application process where a record will be kept for everyone to see who received or who was denied and why.

good question, Deportman.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: FinnegansWake on November 23, 2008, 12:41:55 PM
Quote from: JaxByDefault on November 22, 2008, 08:21:32 PM
Question 9 gets to a key problem with the perceived outlook of SPAR. I hope they answer it.

Racial prejudice? Where did that one come from? Are you seriously implying that the members of SPAR Council are racially prejudiced?

Phil
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: strider on November 23, 2008, 01:16:11 PM
Phil, are you concerned that it may be true? No matter, it is a good question and you need to quote it so the facts are out there:

Quote[9]* What is SPAR's plan to ensure racial and socio-economic prejudice will not become prevalent during the Commerical Corridor's Revitalization?

The question is not just about racial, but economic prejudice and if there is a plan to avoid it. Unfortunately in today's world, they both often go hand in hand.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: FinnegansWake on November 23, 2008, 05:12:11 PM
That's cool. Having a plan, or thinking ahead to insure equality, is way different from a current mind-set. I just wanted to make sure JaxDefault's comment pertained to the Board being pro-active.

Which I agree with by the way...

Phil
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 23, 2008, 07:59:56 PM
I did not ask the question.  I stated that it is problem of perception and that  I hope the board answers the question.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 23, 2008, 08:03:05 PM
Yeah, it was me. 

I'm always harping on gentrification, given half a chance.  It is a worry and any neighborhood or city going through what Springfield is, ought to have a plan to avoid the pitfalls.

Then again, if the economy keeps going the way it is, it is a moot point. 
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: uptowngirl on November 24, 2008, 06:26:07 AM
21) What are SPARS Plans to address the by-laws issues? Will SPAR fix the transgressions or change the by-laws?  If the by-laws are changed, will a neighborhood vote for ratification be held to gain by-in?

22) What is SPARs plan for walkability of the neighborhood? The new construction on Main does not address walkability or bikeability. Since the neighborhood is touted as a "walking neighborhood" what are the plans to bring walkability back to Main St. ?

23) Since "specialized" board positions are given as the reason for not holding elections for board positions, what strides has SPAR taken with finding a structural engineer to join the board or volunteer time to inspect houses up for demolition? Houses have recently come down that have been "questionable", having a structural engineer to inspect and counter city/owner claims seems to make sense.

24) What work has been done to research grants/funds for restoration/preservation/revitalization of vacant homes or clusters such as Dancy Terrace or apartment buildings such as the Dozier that was demolished?

25) How is SPAR reaching out to new and existing businesses in the district? I have noticed the new BP opened up but not heard much (this is a nice, clean gas store with no riff raff hanging out front we should try and encourage this stays that way). I have also noted a new chiropractor on Pearl. What is being done with the current businesses we now have? Are there any grants or tax incentives to help them clean up their store fronts? IS there any type of plan for businesses, clustering? Themes for buildings such as bright colorful paints jobs as seen in other neighborhoods such as Five Points?

26) For beautification purposes what is planned? Is there a donation plan for paint or time to paint that could potentially be pulled together for businesses/homes? Trade schools/groups that may be willing to work at a lower cost or donate their time/skills to people in need?

27) What is the plan for the city lots? Recently the city has been donating these to ONH, which is great IF anything is ever built or done to the properties. Maintenance is not so great. Is there a plan to try and work out a deal with the city to let the neighborhood use/maintain these properties until such time a buyer is found or ground is broken? Many neighbors have expressed interest in doing something with these vacant lots such as pocket park/community gardens. Why not? It is better than an overgrown lot and would add to the neighborhood!

28) What is being done about the parks? I know the dog park is moving along and is fantastic, the skate park seems to be ramping up, but what about all the other green spaces? What about Klutho? ARE there any plans to do anything with these spaces? Is there an opportunity for the neighborhood to purchase and install picnic tables, benches? Landscaping? We have been out to trim and clean the parks, I am wondering if we can install our own landscaping and furniture if enough people are interested?

29) Whatever happened to the tree canopy study? What is being down to preserve our tree canopy? The recent plantings of small short growing trees do not address this issue. Our older trees are dying (or being butchered beyond belief) and small flowering trees are being planted in their place. It may be pretty in a couple of years, but does not make sense for the long term.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 24, 2008, 08:40:59 AM
There is some progress being made on question 22's issues. We're stuck with the Main St. plan that was developed long ago, even though its flaws became obvious long before ground was broken or bids were accepted. It may look pretty, but it is not the most urban development friendly design.

Kenny Logsdon from the city neighborhoods department has lobbied (I believe successfully) for pedestrian cut throughs on the medians at every block. He's reported on this at several Roundtable meetings, as well as addressing the issue of making Main between State and Union two-way so that the commercial corridor is not cut off from downtown. That is a huge issue, and if the city is too slow to address it, then SPAR should lead a more agressive push to the necessary state transportation authorities. It's a tiny, easily overlooked issue that has a large impact on Springfield's relationship with the rest of the urban core.

It isn't a perfect solution and connectivity patterns will forever suffer under the current design.

Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 24, 2008, 10:21:37 AM
FinnegansWake will be collecting questions posted on this thread and submitting them to the SPAR board by the December 1 deadline.

Many thanks to him for the additional time and effort!

Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: FinnegansWake on November 24, 2008, 10:32:20 AM
Quote from: JaxByDefault on November 24, 2008, 10:21:37 AM
FinnegansWake will be collecting questions posted on this thread and submitting them to the SPAR board by the December 1 deadline.

Many thanks to him for the additional time and effort!



Actually, just to make sure all questions are submitted and reviewed, I am submitting what we have so far right now. I will submit any additional ones that Monday.

Keeping in mind that a question that does not make it to the list will still be answered. This is a Q & A Session after all.

Phil
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: fatcat on November 24, 2008, 11:01:47 AM
[30.] How does SPAR board view its relationship to its membership? to the residents?

*Moderator note: added numbering in[]. No content changes made.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: Pi on November 24, 2008, 11:08:05 AM
With hostility? Not all of them but enough. Gerry Troy thought SPAR should do away with members altogether. Now that would be a fine neighborhood organization wouldn't it?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: uptowngirl on November 24, 2008, 11:24:23 AM
What???!!!

Well it really does not surprise me, based on my histroy with that member. Of course he was appointed, not elected most likely because of the Shands connection...
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: JaxByDefault on November 24, 2008, 11:58:33 AM
Thanks for posting your questions, MovedSouth.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: Pi on November 24, 2008, 12:00:07 PM
36. Why did the board vote down the recommendation to list in meeting minutes which board members voted yea, nay or abstain? Transparency?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board - SPAR Bldg Dec 4th 7pm
Post by: FinnegansWake on November 24, 2008, 12:31:45 PM
CHANGE IN VENUE...

just in case, because I missed this earlier, be sure to remember that the meeting on December 4th at 7pm will be at the SPAR Building downstairs, NOT the Karpeles Museum.

Phil

Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: uptowngirl on November 24, 2008, 12:40:46 PM
Damn it I am going to be out of town that whole week!
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 24, 2008, 04:31:48 PM
37.) Is SPAR having financial difficulties because it is overburdened by the crime fund?  Or does the crime fund come from other money earmarked specifically for its use?
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: FinnegansWake on November 24, 2008, 04:39:01 PM
Quote from: sheclown on November 24, 2008, 04:31:48 PM
37.) Is SPAR having financial difficulties because it is overburdened by the crime fund?  Or does the crime fund come from other money earmarked specifically for its use?

I can answer that one. The Crime Fund was set up to go through SPAR and remain totally separate from other money. So yes, the funds come from other money earmarked specifically for its use.

Kind of like the Skateplaza funds...totally separate and earmarked...I think we have about $300 in that pot, so anyone who wants to pitch in let me know  ;)

When I was on the Board the Exec Comm determined that SPAR needed X amount per month to operate (I can't remember the amount). It was actually pretty efficient at that time. Losing the COJ grant meant that other revenue had to be found and to date it has been difficult to do. Or at least on a regular basis.

Phil
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: jbm32206 on November 24, 2008, 04:53:49 PM
I've also copied/pasted the list of questions and emailed them to the spar office.
Title: Re: Working Group: Questions for the SPAR Board
Post by: sheclown on November 24, 2008, 05:16:46 PM
[38.] when did SPAR lose the COJ grant?

*Note: Moderator added numbering in []. No content changed.