Metro Jacksonville

Jacksonville by Neighborhood => The Burbs => Topic started by: Metro Jacksonville on June 17, 2008, 05:00:00 AM

Title: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: Metro Jacksonville on June 17, 2008, 05:00:00 AM
Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park

(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/photos/thumbs/lrg-5266-tapestry-rendering3.jpg)

The first phase of the Southside's newest 'urban village' is rapidly nearing completion.  Will it spur similar development in an area of town where the main street lacks sidewalks?

Full Article
http://www.metrojacksonville.com/content/view/820
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: copperfiend on June 17, 2008, 07:41:53 AM
It's another project on Southside Blvd. without direct access. Much like the shops in front of the Publix, the businesses in this area will struggle. I hope I am wrong though.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: billy on June 17, 2008, 08:32:28 AM
How many acres ?
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 17, 2008, 08:38:13 AM
18 acres

From the Times-Union - 3/05/07
QuoteUrban life heads to the suburbs

Construction of 45 townhomes and some retail space at Tapestry Park, a new Southside community tucked between Tinseltown and the Merrill Lynch office campus, has begun, according to recently paid city building permits. Developed by Birmingham, Ala.-based Arlington Properties, doing business as Tapestry Partners LLC, the 18-acre neighborhood eventually will have 52 multi-story condominiums, some with ground-floor shops, restaurants and nightlife venues. The site also is expected to house the area's first Hotel Indigo, InterContinental Hotel Group's newest boutique hotel brand.
The idea is to create a trendy community where you can live, work and play without needing a car to go from one to the other.

No car? On the Southside of Jacksonville? Yup.

There are various developments in the vicinity of Tinseltown and St. Johns Town Center touting the live, work, play concept including Toscana and Esplanade, both of which will be built adjacent to the town center.

The second phase of the Tapestry Park development, which is expected to start construction later this year, will add about 275 homes, according to a news release in December. Building permits show that construction of the first phase will cost upwards of $13.86 million.

www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/030507/bus_8238961.shtml
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: jmccharen on June 17, 2008, 09:24:33 AM
I. HATE. this. movement in development.
You still need a car to live here. You will still drive your car across the development to Publix. You will still drive your car to your cube-farm job down Gate Parkway. That's not such a big deal, it's just human behavior,  but these New Urbanist fantasy lands promote themselves as the ultimate in real estate virtue, and while I have to agree that this condo-farm is eight thousand degrees more humane than most, it just irks me to no end that this is the best we've got right now.

Maybe 50 years from now, when it is simply too expensive to drive at all, developments like this one will be our new urban centers, and the "Town Center" will actually be some kind of (albeit, still completely surreal) town center. I can see that happening. In the meantime I just wonder, who the heck decided to build this crap out in the middle of the swamp next to the "Town Center" (i.e. on top of what used to be wilderness), instead of somewhere closer to the ACTUAL town center of this exploded, distended city?

Jacksonville still lacks almost everything it needs to be a thriving city, including real public transit, integrated development planning and land-use planning, population density along transit corridors...and more sprawl, even with a New Urbanist flavor, simply doesn't help.

It may seem silly, but I think I actually get more frustrated by developments like this than their counterparts that don't have any of the same amenities and claims. But let me reiterate, this one is much better than those. It'll be much nicer to live in, by leaps and bounds. It just blows my mind how far we are from sustainable development in this part of the world, and I can't give this sort of development very much credit for being less bad than most.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: zoo on June 17, 2008, 10:37:20 AM
I'm with you jmc. This makes me want to throw up.

It looks like the southside is winning the battle over downtown for jobs, retail, etc.

JEDC (aka downtown's "master developer"), why don't you end the fantasy that downtown can be revived? Quit pretending you're trying. Next step? Put Deutschebank down there by Merrill Lynch, BCBS, and all the other corporate behemoths that could have saved downtown were it not for bumbling politicians (leadership level -- Gate Parkway, anyone? -- AND body politic) and corporate, carbon-emitting suburbanites (most of JEDC's board members and execs).
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 17, 2008, 10:40:16 AM
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.  Deutschebank is looking at an existing office building at......5022 Gate Parkway.

QuoteJEDC (aka downtown's "master developer"), why don't you end the fantasy that downtown can be revived? Quit pretending you're trying.

I still believe that the Downtown Market would be better off with less governmental interaction.  I'd like COJ to take their hands out of the cookie jar, leave the room and let the free market step into the kitchen.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: Captain Zissou on June 17, 2008, 11:03:50 AM
I was in Charlotte, NC last weekend, home of some real work play condos.  I stayed at Cityview Towers and (lower income dorm-ish building catering to BoA and Wachovia interns and college students) walked to lunch, dinner, shopping, bars, Wachovia's campus,an art museum, an IMAX theater, and two different grocery stores.  I never realized how far behind even the second tier cities Jacksonville is.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 17, 2008, 11:31:12 AM
QuoteI never realized how far behind even the second tier cities Jacksonville is.

For the most part, many of these improvements in similar sized cities are recent additions made within the last ten years or so.  We've just dropped the ball on things that have become routine in many of these other municipalities.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: zoo on June 17, 2008, 08:10:56 PM
Bank of America bought the revitalization of downtown Charlotte. Where are Jacksonville's corporate benefactors. Oh, that's right... they are living in Ponte Vedra and setting up their shops in the Southside Sprawl. If there are corporate benefactors that "get" downtown, please follow Bank of America's (in Charlotte) lead!
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: urbanlibertarian on June 17, 2008, 08:42:29 PM
Quote from: thelakelander on June 17, 2008, 10:40:16 AM
I still believe that the Downtown Market would be better off with less governmental interaction.  I'd like COJ to take their hands out of the cookie jar, leave the room and let the free market step into the kitchen.

Amen, brother.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 17, 2008, 09:21:45 PM
Quote from: zoo on June 17, 2008, 08:10:56 PM
Bank of America bought the revitalization of downtown Charlotte. Where are Jacksonville's corporate benefactors. Oh, that's right... they are living in Ponte Vedra and setting up their shops in the Southside Sprawl. If there are corporate benefactors that "get" downtown, please follow Bank of America's (in Charlotte) lead!

Unfortunately, they (Barnett Bank) were bought out by what would eventually become Bank of America.  So now we need CSX, Fidelity, Winn-Dixie, etc. to step up to the plate.  But I don't think they have an interest in doing so.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: second_pancake on June 18, 2008, 09:28:21 AM
Whoa, whoa, whoa.  Slow down jmc.  This is the one thing that recent developers have gotten right.  They failed with Town Center and Nocatee and River Town by doing exactly what you say you hate...making it a pseudo-town that still requires people to drive everywhere.

Merril Lynch is directly next door along with Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Less than a mile down the road is a major insurance company along with a mortgage company.  These are HUGE employers, not your average national retailer paying minimum wage.  The people that work at these places will actually be able to afford an apartment or townhome in Tapestry Park and they will NOT have to drive to work, they can easily walk or bike.

As for you comment about having to drive to Publix, unfortunately that may be true but it has nothing to do with the poor planning of TP but rather the poor planning of the developer that created that Publix shopping center.  Even if you live in the apartments/houses directly behind the Publix, it is difficult to get there by foot or bike.

The businesses in TP are cut off from Southside for good reason, to keep traffic moving on that major artery and to keep TP a true live/work/play community. It was not designed to accomodate shoppers from Orange Park to travel down Southside and stop in for a drink or a bite to eat.  It was designed to accomate the RESIDENTS of TP and with that in mind, they've done a bang-up job.  Will it be difficult for the businesses at first?  Of course, but with over 370 residences and major employers with virtual direct access, they will do just fine.  Just think of all the employees who would previously have to drive across Southside blvd to go to Camille's, Larry's, Bojangles or Arby's for lunch that will now be able to merely walk down the sidewalk and be able to sit outside a cafe, taking in some scenery rather than being in a hurried rush and staring out at a sea of cars on Southside.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: second_pancake on June 18, 2008, 09:45:59 AM
I also want to make note that I too think the downtown area needs to be the focus, however Jax is too damn big and the unfornate truth is that Southside has a large, if not larger, center of professional business than downtown and it's not new.  Businesses continue to build here because of the sucess of the pre-existing businesses and the proximity to their clients/vendors and their employees.  Because of the sprawl, Southside is right in the middle of most of the major residential communities making the commute for employees relatively the same regardless of what part of town they are coming from.  You can't say that about downtown.

CZ mentioned seeing successful build-outs in Charlotte.  Just having come back from the Dallas-Fort Worth area, I have seen this phenomenon as well...mostly in the Fort Worth area btw, Dallas is still behind.

Communities like Flower Mound, Bedford, Colleyville, Hurst, North Richland Hills, and the like...even downtown Fort Worth, have built actual towncenters going so far as to move their seat of town government there (3 of the towns I saw had the Courthouse and/or City Hall moved directly into the new town center).  They built the centers around thriving businesses and considered traffic patterns, existing housing and general livibility.  I could go on and on about the great things I saw, or didn't see in the case of homeless people, in Fort Worth, but I'll leave it alone for now.

The point I'm trying to make is that all of the communities I mentioned above, including the city of Fort Worth, don't add up to the areas that make Jacksonville.  It works there because everything is split into it's own entity.  We see development on the Southside here and scream about Jax having it's priorities wrong, but would you more than likely wouldn't feel that way if it was the Township of Southside, and downtown probably wouldn't be in the state it's in now if that area was known simply as Jacksonville.  In fact, it might generate some jealousy and competition, but what do I know.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 10:13:44 AM
Quote from: second_pancake on June 18, 2008, 09:28:21 AM
The businesses in TP are cut off from Southside for good reason, to keep traffic moving on that major artery and to keep TP a true live/work/play community. It was not designed to accomodate shoppers from Orange Park to travel down Southside and stop in for a drink or a bite to eat.  It was designed to accomate the RESIDENTS of TP and with that in mind, they've done a bang-up job.  Will it be difficult for the businesses at first?  Of course, but with over 370 residences and major employers with virtual direct access, they will do just fine.  Just think of all the employees who would previously have to drive across Southside blvd to go to Camille's, Larry's, Bojangles or Arby's for lunch that will now be able to merely walk down the sidewalk and be able to sit outside a cafe, taking in some scenery rather than being in a hurried rush and staring out at a sea of cars on Southside.

I still question the ultimate decision of building 40,000 square feet of retail (roughly the size of a typical Publix store) on a side street with limited visibility and access.  370 residents and office workers at Merrill Lynch can't support that much retail square footage.  The hotel will help, but other than a destination restaurant or two, in key locations (where signage can be still seen from Southside) most of the retail space at Tapestry will end up being service oriented type businesses (Day Spas, Salons, real estate offices, etc.) that don't have to rely as much on direct access and visibility.  
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 10:16:45 AM
QuoteThe point I'm trying to make is that all of the communities I mentioned above, including the city of Fort Worth, don't add up to the areas that make Jacksonville.  It works there because everything is split into it's own entity.  We see development on the Southside here and scream about Jax having it's priorities wrong, but would you more than likely wouldn't feel that way if it was the Township of Southside, and downtown probably wouldn't be in the state it's in now if that area was known simply as Jacksonville.  In fact, it might generate some jealousy and competition, but what do I know.

Interesting observation and good point.  It would most likely be viewed in the same light as Downtown Norfolk and Virginia Beach's Town Center area.  A little jealousy and competition from both to be the dominate urban focal point in the same metro area.  However, the difference is they both are major focal points of their respective municipal governments.  On the other hand we have one entity overseeing both areas.  When that entity does not have the vision or a good idea of how to get from Point A to Point B, both areas fail to reach their ultimate potential.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: Canon on June 18, 2008, 12:12:08 PM
If all these other areas are so great and get it right then why are you living here??? What I hate is people here are screaming about things to which they know little about outside the fact they can’t walk place to place. First this is a free market, it’s not your money so it really doesn’t matter what you think about the viability of a project. Secondly, I think the architecture is far better than most projects currently seen in the area. Finally, if you don’t like the project, don’t live there or patronage the shops. As far as Downtown is concerned, I wish there where better restaurants and bars. I work Downtown and, trust me the residential dwellings are becoming better and more prevalent. But understand that you have a core that is bisected by a river that is both a benefit and hindrance. Jacksonville is spread out so it will take time for things to reach critical mass in different parts of the city like they have on the Gate Parkway area.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: Duke on June 18, 2008, 12:21:13 PM
Quote from: Canon on June 18, 2008, 12:12:08 PM
If all these other areas are so great and get it right then why are you living here??? What I hate is people here are screaming about things to which they know little about outside the fact they can’t walk place to place. First this is a free market, it’s not your money so it really doesn’t matter what you think about the viability of a project. Secondly, I think the architecture is far better than most projects currently seen in the area. Finally, if you don’t like the project, don’t live there or patronage the shops. As far as Downtown is concerned, I wish there where better restaurants and bars. I work Downtown and, trust me the residential dwellings are becoming better and more prevalent. But understand that you have a core that is bisected by a river that is both a benefit and hindrance. Jacksonville is spread out so it will take time for things to reach critical mass in different parts of the city like they have on the Gate Parkway area.

AMEN TO THAT!
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 12:25:54 PM
Quote from: Canon on June 18, 2008, 12:12:08 PM
If all these other areas are so great and get it right then why are you living here???

Good question, Canon.  Being a concerned resident of this community, I have a passion to want to see our community improve and take advantage of the potential that it has.  With that said, I feel its better to use my education in a manner that exposes our short comings and potential ways to overcome them, instead of accepting things as status quo.

QuoteWhat I hate is people here are screaming about things to which they know little about outside the fact they can't walk place to place.  First this is a free market, it's not your money so it really doesn't matter what you think about the viability of a project.

Correct, the great thing about living in America is that we all have our opinions and are free to discuss them.  Its also good to have options.  One man's trash is another one's treasure.  However, from a public planning standpoint, we have a major say in pushing for the local region to develop in a manner that builds upon its quality of life, as opposed to straining it.

QuoteSecondly, I think the architecture is far better than most projects currently seen in the area. Finally, if you don't like the project, don't live there or patronage the shops.

I can't speak for the others in this thread (and for all I know, you may not be even talking to my responses), but I do believe the architecture is better than most projects in the area, as well.  I won't live there, but I'll probably visit the Village Tavern for a meal, since I live currently live in the area.

QuoteAs far as Downtown is concerned, I wish there where better restaurants and bars. I work Downtown and, trust me the residential dwellings are becoming better and more prevalent. But understand that you have a core that is bisected by a river that is both a benefit and hindrance. Jacksonville is spread out so it will take time for things to reach critical mass in different parts of the city like they have on the Gate Parkway area.

Sounds like an excuse to me.  Nearly every major metropolitan region could say something similar about their natural landscape.  Nothing is new under the sun.  There's good and bad examples out there that we can tap into to make our efforts for greatness easier to achieve.  If we let the free market have a little more say, I think Downtown will boom just as much as the Gate Parkway area.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: second_pancake on June 18, 2008, 01:11:42 PM
Well said, Lake.  I'm glad you responded before I did.  I have a tendancy to get hot-headed and I don't think anyone would have understood all the special character inserts ;)
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: tufsu1 on June 18, 2008, 01:31:25 PM
Quote from: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 10:13:44 AM

I still question the ultimate decision of building 40,000 square feet of retail (roughly the size of a typical Publix store) on a side street with limited visibility and access.  370 residents and office workers at Merrill Lynch can't support that much retail square footage.  The hotel will help, but other than a destination restaurant or two, in key locations (where signage can be still seen from Southside) most of the retail space at Tapestry will end up being service oriented type businesses (Day Spas, Salons, real estate offices, etc.) that don't have to rely as much on direct access and visibility.  

6,000 employees at BC/BS should be more than enough support
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 01:41:08 PM
Sure, if they were all forced to shop and eat there as opposed to the Town Center, Markets at Town Center or Tinseltown, all of which are just as easy to get to and offer a lot more.  Downtown has 60,000, but still can't pull in a McDonalds, CVS or Walgreens.  The restaurant should be able to pull in hotel guests and a few Merrill Lynch employees, but lets not forget that these major corporations also have their own in-house food services.  I'm a realist, however I do wish them the best, because it beats the typical stuff lining the corridor.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: thelakelander on June 18, 2008, 02:06:20 PM
Btw, don't get me wrong.  I'm not saying that the retail space will sit empty.  However, what I am saying is that certain physical features (indirect access, visibility, no stoplight, etc.) in the plan set it up to be the type of space that will most likely draw service oriented retail (there's nothing negative about this).  There is precedence in the area.  Two similar type situations that come to mind are Lantern Square at Kendall Pointe and the interior courtyard shops in the Publix anchored Deerwood shopping center on the corner of Baymeadows and Southside.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: jenthom0225 on August 24, 2008, 03:13:10 PM
I'm pretty new to the Jacksonville/Southside area and I LOVE have all of the mixed use opportunities available.  I'm going to explore moving into Tapestry Park as soon as my lease expires in 3 months.  Where else in Jacksonville can you walk to great restaurants and the movies?  The Town Center is two traffic lights away and I can be in downtown Jacksonville or the beach in 20 minutes.  Bring on all the new stores and cool places to eat, drink and shop!
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: copperfiend on December 02, 2009, 11:46:25 AM
Not sure if this has been brought up but I drove by Tapestry Park this morning and it appears they are adding a direct entrance from Southside Blvd. This should be great news for the development and it tenants.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: Steve on December 02, 2009, 01:26:20 PM
Quote from: jenthom0225 on August 24, 2008, 03:13:10 PM
Where else in Jacksonville can you walk to great restaurants and the movies?

Riverside and San Marco.
Title: Re: Suburban Infill: Tapestry Park
Post by: fieldafm on April 09, 2010, 02:17:15 PM
I've worked in this area for the past 8 years.  I drive past Tapestry Park constantly, but have never been in the development.  I stopped by to pick up a quick sandwich from Jimmy Johns and drove through the development.  It's not for me, but the concept and execution really suprised me.  For what it is, Tapestry is a very well executed multi-use development.