Proximity to employment can influence a range of economic and social outcomes, from local fiscal
health to the employment prospects of residents, particularly low-income and minority workers. An
analysis of private-sector employment and demographic data at the census tract level reveals that:
Between 2000 and 2012, the number of jobs within the typical commute distance for residents in a
major metro area fell by 7 percent. Of the nation's 96 largest metro areas, in only 29---many in
the South and West, including McAllen, Texas, Bakersfield, Calif., Raleigh, N.C., and Baton Rouge,
La.---did the number of jobs within a typical commute distance for the aver- age resident increase.
Each of these 29 metro areas also experienced net job gains between 2000 and 2012.
As employment suburbanized, the number of jobs near both the typical city and suburban resident
fell. Suburban residents saw the number of jobs within a typical commute distance drop by 7
percent, more than twice the decline experienced by the typical city resident (3 per- cent). In
all, 32.7 million city residents lived in neighborhoods with declining proximity to jobs compared
to 59.4 million suburban residents.
As poor and minority residents shifted toward suburbs in the 2000s, their proximity to jobs fell
more than for non-poor and white residents. The number of jobs near the typical Hispanic (-17
percent) and black (-14 percent) resident in major metro areas declined much more steeply than for
white (-6 percent) residents, a pattern repeated for the typical poor
(-17 percent) versus non-poor (-6 percent) resident.
Residents of high-poverty and majority-minority neighborhoods experienced particularly pronounced
declines in job proximity. Overall, 61 percent of high-poverty tracts (with poverty rates above 20
percent) and 55 percent of majority-minority neighborhoods experienced declines in job proximity
between 2000 and 2012. A growing number of these tracts are in suburbs, where nearby jobs for the
residents of these neighborhoods dropped at a much faster pace than for the typical suburban
resident (17 and 16 percent, respectively, versus 7 percent).
For local and regional leaders working to grow their economies in ways that promote opportunity and
upward mobility for all residents, these findings underscore the importance of understand- ing how
regional economic and demographic trends intersect at the local level to shape access to
employment opportunities, particularly for disadvantaged populations and neighborhoods.
And they point to the need for more integrated and collaborative regional strategies around, housing,
transportation, and workforce decisions that take job proximity into account.
http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Research/Files/Reports/2015/03/24-job-proximity/Srvy_JobsProximity.pdf