CSX JAXPORT plan opens the door for Commuter Rail
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/photos/thumbs/lrg-4541-p1080204.JPG)
While most of Jacksonville focuses on the impact of CSX's rail enhancement plans on JAXPORT, Metro Jacksonville takes a look at how this impacts potential Urban Commuter Rail and Bus Rapid Transit plans.
Full Article
http://www.metrojacksonville.com/content/view/768
Good News!! Since this is tied to the Orlando Commuter Rail deal, it gives us even more incentive to make sure that proposal does not get off track (yes, I meant that) in the Legislature - where there is opposition to the deal.
In Central Florida, primarily Lakeland and Tampa. Lakelanders are upset that most of Orlando's freight traffic will be shifted through their downtown, splitting it in half since most streets are at grade crossings and Tampa officials are upset that they are being left out of the deal for commuter rail that could link them with Orlando.
QuoteCSX unveils $40 million track expansion
By DAVID HUNT, The Times-Union
CSX Corp. announced a $40 million plan Monday that it hopes will untangle truck congestion along Jacksonville's Heckscher Drive as the region braces for a shipping boom.
The Jacksonville-based railroad company plans to upgrade tracks and build a link through Nassau County to connect the rails along U.S. 17 to the main line running north toward Waycross, Ga. The idea is to divert cargo containers from the road while also avoiding rail congestion downtown.
Jacksonville Port Authority officials have stressed a need for rail, as projections call for a tripling of cargo in coming years largely because of the TraPac terminal under construction at Dames Point and a pending agreement with Korean shipping company Hanjin.
Millions of dollars will be needed to upgrade the road system - $11.8 million has been committed so far for what authority Executive Director Rick Ferrin called "a quick fix" to ensure nearby roads can handle initial TraPac traffic.
But there are several factors that need to come together before CSX can lay out a definitive plan to put the cargo on rail from TraPac.
The $40 million will come from the state, which is planning to pay CSX $150 million to acquire rights to 61 miles of track in Central Florida for a commuter rail service. But lawmakers are debating how to insure the line.
Clarence W. Gooden, CSX's chief commercial officer, said if the debate kills the deal, CSX still plans to complete the rail upgrades even though the corporate capital budget is planned for the next three years. That raises the question of when the money would be available.
Full Article:
http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/042208/met_270742216.shtml
I don't know if Sen. Dan Webster's bill will pass, but what he's proposing, along with profits from freight operations on commuter rail tracks, would be a solution to JTA's question of finding a dedicated funding source for annual operations & maintainance costs for local commuter rail without having to jack up local resident's taxes.
Anyway, it seems these they are trying to line up allies to get the Orlando commuter rail deal passed. First our port logistics rail solution is tied to the Orlando deal and now they are trying to bring South Florida on board with a solution that helps fund and maintain rail systems statewide.
QuoteRail Bill to Be Simplified
Sen. Dan Webster promises a track purchase that takes CSX 'out of the equation.'
TALLAHASSEE | A plan to bring commuter rail to greater Orlando may be streamlined to cut state funding for a mega-hub in Winter Haven and rely on higher rental car taxes to pay for the new passenger service.
Sen. Dan Webster, R-Orlando, said Monday that he will ask a Senate committee to drop everything from the complex deal between the state and CSX Transportation except a $450 million purchase of 61.5 miles of rail line and a promise from the state to exempt CSX from legal liability in accidents involving passenger trains on the line.
QuoteWebster's move may be an effort to get support from South Florida lawmakers who have little to gain in the CSX deal. Under Webster's proposal, anyone who rents a car at an international airport in a county that has a government-run passenger rail system would pay the $2 tax. That money would be used to pay for commuter rail operations. That would allow South Florida counties to rely on tourism-heavy car rentals to subsidize their own Tri-Rail passenger service.
QuoteUnder the deal, CSX would pay the state $10 million per year to use the new commuter line for freight service for up to 12 hours per day.
full article: http://www.theledger.com/article/20080422/NEWS/804220429/1039
Quote from: thelakelander on April 22, 2008, 06:54:57 AM
In Central Florida, primarily Lakeland and Tampa. Lakelanders are upset that most of Orlando's freight traffic will be shifted through their downtown, splitting it in half since most streets are at grade crossings and Tampa officials are upset that they are being left out of the deal for commuter rail that could link them with Orlando.
Wouldn't getting the Orlando deal done help Tampa (and mabey Jacksonville) get their rail online. Is Tampa's feeling if we don't have it they shouldn't have it.
If the proposed line photo is accurate it looks like CSX plans to reuse the rail bed that runs along SR 200 from Yulee to Callahan. This was the old east coast/ seaboard connection (oklaw' correct me if I am wrong) that hasnt been used in probably 25, maybe 30 years. If they plan to use this line, what kind of impact will this have on traffic on US-1 in Callahan. What about the business that have already developed on or near these railbeds?
Quote from: thelakelander on April 22, 2008, 10:01:01 AM
QuoteRail Bill to Be Simplified
QuoteWebster's move may be an effort to get support from South Florida lawmakers who have little to gain in the CSX deal. Under Webster's proposal, anyone who rents a car at an international airport in a county that has a government-run passenger rail system would pay the $2 tax. That money would be used to pay for commuter rail operations. That would allow South Florida counties to rely on tourism-heavy car rentals to subsidize their own Tri-Rail passenger service.
QuoteUnder the deal, CSX would pay the state $10 million per year to use the new commuter line for freight service for up to 12 hours per day.
full article: http://www.theledger.com/article/20080422/NEWS/804220429/1039
Mr. Miller these subsidies do not mention BRT. If you want the new car rental fee and the CSX line use fee to help with operational costs we need commuter rail.
Quote from: adamh0903 on April 22, 2008, 10:02:51 AM
If the proposed line photo is accurate it looks like CSX plans to reuse the rail bed that runs along SR 200 from Yulee to Callahan. This was the old east coast/ seaboard connection (oklaw' correct me if I am wrong) that hasnt been used in probably 25, maybe 30 years. If they plan to use this line, what kind of impact will this have on traffic on US-1 in Callahan. What about the business that have already developed on or near these railbeds?
From a Google Earth search, the former railbed ROW appears to still be intact. It would allow Nassau to take advantage of the port's expansion as well.
Steve Rieck, executive director of the Nassau County Economic Development Board, said while the details of a new connector rail line in Nassau are still sketchy, rail is critical to the county's industrial development and expansion would help.
"If they do go through with this rail infrastructure improvement, it will make Nassau County more attractive to warehouse and distribution facilities that can take advantage of the new rail to points north," he said.http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/042208/met_270742216.shtml
Quote from: JeffreyS on April 22, 2008, 10:02:31 AM
Quote from: thelakelander on April 22, 2008, 06:54:57 AM
In Central Florida, primarily Lakeland and Tampa. Lakelanders are upset that most of Orlando's freight traffic will be shifted through their downtown, splitting it in half since most streets are at grade crossings and Tampa officials are upset that they are being left out of the deal for commuter rail that could link them with Orlando.
Wouldn't getting the Orlando deal done help Tampa (and mabey Jacksonville) get their rail online. Is Tampa's feeling if we don't have it they shouldn't have it.
The problem with the Orlando deal is that while it brings commuter rail to Orlando, it kills the chance of linking Tampa, Lakeland and Orlando with commuter rail. The reason it kills is because a majority of Central Florida freight rail operations with be relocated through downtown Lakeland, sucking up the needed capacity for commuter rail on that same line (it travels through Downtown Tampa, Lakeland and Orlando), before branching off in Auburndale to head south to the proposed Winter Haven rail hub and Miami.
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/images/cfrail/florida-rail-map.jpg)
The Orlando deal relocates the majority of CSX's rail traffic to the S-Line from Baldwin to Lakeland. When freight gets to downtown Lakeland, it will shift back to the A-Line for 15 miles before heading south in Auburndale to go to South Florida. That 15 mile stretch between Lakeland and Auburndale is a critical link for any rail plan that would involve connecting the Central Florida communities together.
The bed is still there, my customers park on it, some of the bed near US-1 was donated to the Town of Callahan, and is used as the site for the old Train depot.
http://photos.jacksonville.com/mycapture/enlarge.asp?userphoto=0&image=12249457&thispage=1
This picture is looking straight down the rail bed from US-1 in callahan, this picture was taken at the Train Depot.
If we want commuter rail to link cities such as Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville we may have to add rail capacity but is commuter rail really needed to connect large metro areas. I mean do people live in Tampa and commute to Orlando.
Quote from: JeffreyS on April 22, 2008, 11:01:39 AM
If we want commuter rail to link cities such as Tampa, Orlando and Jacksonville we may have to add rail capacity but is commuter rail really needed to connect large metro areas. I mean do people live in Tampa and commute to Orlando.
Yes, Yes, Yes. There are a number of people in Central Florida who commute between the metros, especially Lakeland. Lakeland's rapid growth has been fueled by companies choosing to shut down duel locations in Tampa and Orlando to open up new larger single facilities in and around Lakeland. Those employees commute to both metros. When I lived in Winter Haven (15 miles east of Lakeland), my next door neighbors commuted daily to jobs in St. Petersburg and Tampa. When I lived in Lakeland, we would travel to both larger metros (downtown Tampa is 30 minute drive from downtown Lakeland) for a variety of activities. +20,000 of Disney's employees live in the Lakeland MSA. I also seriously considered taking a job in Orlando before relocating to Jax, because it would have allowed me to keep my house down there. If there is a place to start commuter rail in Florida, its that area. Besides, the distance between the two cities is roughly the same length as South Florida's Tri-Rail between Miami and West Palm Beach.
QuoteWebster's move may be an effort to get support from South Florida lawmakers who have little to gain in the CSX deal. Under Webster's proposal, anyone who rents a car at an international airport in a county that has a government-run passenger rail system would pay the $2 tax. That money would be used to pay for commuter rail operations. That would allow South Florida counties to rely on tourism-heavy car rentals to subsidize their own Tri-Rail passenger service.
Would taxing car rentals at the airports eleminate any incentive for connecting them to a transit system? Seems like a rail connection would lower the amount of car rentals.
QuoteThe Orlando deal relocates the majority of CSX's rail traffic to the S-Line from Baldwin to Lakeland. When freight gets to downtown Lakeland, it will shift back to the A-Line for 15 miles before heading south in Auburndale to go to South Florida. That 15 mile stretch between Lakeland and Auburndale is a critical link for any rail plan that would involve connecting the Central Florida communities together.
Is that stretch running through downtown Lakeland or is it more suburban? Sounds like an easy fix would be to lay more track along that segment and build a few overpasses. Or simply run a new "bypass" line (right over top of the I-4 emblem) to connect the Auberndale junction with the mainline further north. Not the end of the world.
The Lakeland problem seems solvable.
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa111/Ocklawaha/CRITICAL%20Maps/jax-existingraillinePROPOSED.jpg)
The map excludes the original Seaboard Route between Fernandina and Cedar Key. In our area the Yulee-Callahan line was used as a branchline until fairly recent memory. The Gross Cut-Off was last to go but it was designed to get the Seaboard traffic to or from North of the border, over to the Callahan-Baldwin and south by-pass for Jacksonville. The passenger trains and Jacksonville or West Coast bound freight came on down along N. Main Street into Springfield Yard, then used the "S" to Union Station or (Beaver Street) WEST JAX. yard. My best guess would be they'll use the older route so they don't mess with the deal with First Coast Railroad. First Coast Runs the Kings Bay-Kingsland-Gross-Yulee-Fernandina Trackage. So a CSX line from Jax Port- Yulee - Callahan wouldn't crimp their operations.
Better still, if State money could come into play would be the pale blue line shown, which is a route more or less available for both the Norfolk Southern AND the CSX to access the port.
Bottom line, to really spring this and make us all happy, the CITY-STATE-SHORTLINE-TRANSIT operators need to buy the track from Jax-Port to North Main and hence South into Springfield, rebuilding the "S" connection.
If we did this, and CSX went ahead with rebuilding the old Fl RR line, we would have universal access to the port by all carriers and CSX would offer a reliever route to everything headed north. Wonder if NS is reading this? Wake up boys!
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa111/Ocklawaha/SALMeteronSatLibertyStJax.jpg)
The old "S" from Springfield - Union Station was once a busy passenger route with some freight traffic as well, just to the North was the old "St. Johns River Terminal Railroad" or the "SOUTHERN" which today is the Norfolk Southern. In this photo (I FINALLY FOUND IT) one can see both routes with one of Seaboards trains headed into town. Note the NS line just to the North. My photo has "Liberty St Florida" on the back of it.
Ocklawaha
Quote from: Jason on April 22, 2008, 11:10:45 AM
QuoteWebster's move may be an effort to get support from South Florida lawmakers who have little to gain in the CSX deal. Under Webster's proposal, anyone who rents a car at an international airport in a county that has a government-run passenger rail system would pay the $2 tax. That money would be used to pay for commuter rail operations. That would allow South Florida counties to rely on tourism-heavy car rentals to subsidize their own Tri-Rail passenger service.
Would taxing car rentals at the airports eleminate any incentive for connecting them to a transit system? Seems like a rail connection would lower the amount of car rentals.
Good question.
QuoteThe Orlando deal relocates the majority of CSX's rail traffic to the S-Line from Baldwin to Lakeland. When freight gets to downtown Lakeland, it will shift back to the A-Line for 15 miles before heading south in Auburndale to go to South Florida. That 15 mile stretch between Lakeland and Auburndale is a critical link for any rail plan that would involve connecting the Central Florida communities together.
Is that stretch running through downtown Lakeland or is it more suburban? Sounds like an easy fix would be to lay more track along that segment and build a few overpasses.[/quote]
1. That stretch runs through the heart of Downtown Lakeland, cutting their core in half. For comparison's sake imagine if Laura Street was filled with shops and restaurants, while Adams was an at grade rail crossing with tons of daily freight traffic splitting downtown into two. The easy answer is adding overpasses, but neither the State, Orlando or CSX is willing to fund them and to construct them would certainly involve taking out lofts, restaurants and shops.
Downtown Lakeland
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/photos/thumbs/lrg-2756-p1050314.JPG)
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/photos/thumbs/lrg-2775-p1050271.JPG)
QuoteOr simply run a new "bypass" line (right over top of the I-4 emblem) to connect the Auberndale junction with the mainline further north. Not the end of the world.
There is a solution, but someone needs to fund it. This would be to relay the old main line from Wildwood to Auburndale. Unfortunately, the situation Lakeland faces is one that was caused by poor planning on the part of the State and Orlando. All they are doing is shifting the traffic problem 45 miles south to another Central Florida community and asking its taxpayers to pay CSX for it. Unfortunately, Lakeland is a smaller community and most likely does not stand a chance against political big boys like CSX, the State, Orlando and now Jacksonville and possibly South Florida, although their solution makes a ton of sense.
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa111/Ocklawaha/SALMeteronSatLibertyStJax.jpg)
Nice find Ock. This is the Springfield warehouse district and the white building in the background appears to be the old Merita Bread plant on Market Street, meaning this image is taking from Liberty, looking west. Here's a few present day images looking at this area from different viewpoints.
Market looking east
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/images/commuter_rail/s_line/DSC_0044.jpg)
Liberty looking east
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/images/commuter_rail/s_line/DSC_0048.jpg)
Liberty, looking NE
(http://www.metrojacksonville.com/photos/thumbs/lrg-3042-springfield-before.jpg)
The grassy area is where the track with the train in the older photo, once laid.
QuoteOur position: Giving CSX limited liability for commuter rail is totally justified
The Orlando Sentinel
Editorial
April 22, 2008
Florida's Senate gets the chance today to support mass transit when its transportation committee takes up the insurance portion of the deal that would bring commuter rail to Central Florida.
Or it can set back for years the cause of moving people around their region in something other than gas-guzzling, road-clogging cars. It can do that if it falls for the pleadings of trial lawyers and a Lakeland senator, who'd have it believe the deal's an outrageous, unfair, unjustifiable giveaway to CSX Corp., which is selling the 61-mile rail line commuter rail would run on.
CSX would pay for damages that its freight cars caused. The state would pay for damages caused by passenger trains. If freight and commuter cars crashed, causing injuries on the street, both parties would pay.
Outrageous? It's the same deal that South Florida's Tri Rail gets. And other states' commuter-rail systems typically offer rail companies more generous liability terms.
Unfair? By putting passengers on a freight line, the state's introducing a potential liability for CSX that wasn't there previously, supporting the state taking on some of the risk. House transportation committee Chairman Rich Glorioso rightly noted that last month, when his committee passed the liability bill.
Unjustifiable? Voting against the deal at the behest of trial lawyers and Sen. Paula Dockery would derail commuter rail in Florida for at least a generation. Congress, partly funding it, won't again for years if the Legislature rejects it. No Florida lawmaker should want to have to justify that.
QuoteThere is a solution, but someone needs to fund it. This would be to relay the old main line from Wildwood to Auburndale. Unfortunately, the situation Lakeland faces is one that was caused by poor planning on the part of the State and Orlando. All they are doing is shifting the traffic problem 45 miles south to another Central Florida community and asking its taxpayers to pay CSX for it. Unfortunately, Lakeland is a smaller community and most likely does not stand a chance against political big boys like CSX, the State, Orlando and now Jacksonville and possibly South Florida, although their solution makes a ton of sense.
The image you posted doesn't seem to show all of the rail lines through that area of the state. This Google Earth image shows the "Auburndale" line continuing north to eventually tie back in with the CSX line further north. Could this line be abandoned or is it owned by a short line? If CSX could get their hands on it they would have a direct shot to the south and would be able to re-rout all of their South Florida to this corridor.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y74/asonj23/Google%20Earth%20Snapshots/RailCorridors-1.jpg)
The last trains rolled through Callahan in the early/mid 80's on the old FL RR line. The old timers around here say they called that line, "the peggy". since that time business along the rail bed rented the property from FL RR and then CSX for business parking and other uses, about 8 months ago, most businesses got a letter from CSX about stating CSX no longer owned the property and businesses could no longer lease it. After extensive land and title searches we found out that CSX DOES own the property.
QuoteThe image you posted doesn't seem to show all of the rail lines through that area of the state. This Google Earth image shows the "Auburndale" line continuing north to eventually tie back in with the CSX line further north. Could this line be abandoned or is it owned by a short line? If CSX could get their hands on it they would have a direct shot to the south and would be able to re-rout all of their South Florida to this corridor.
The image I posted shows today's operational rail lines and the companies that own them. The Wildwood-Auburndale line was pulled up over 20 years ago. Today, its the Gen. Van Fleet Trail.
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/gwt/guide/regions/eastcentral/trails/general_james.htm
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v84/lakelander/auburndale-2.jpg)
The Auburndale line currently ends next to a lumberyard just south of Old Dixie Highway. On the Google Earth aerial you posted that would be the "P" in Polk
Parkway.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v84/lakelander/auburndale-1.jpg)
If the Orlando deal is approved, the majority of freight traffic will run East from Downtown Lakeland on the A-Line and head south to the proposed Winter Haven rail hub, near the Minute Main Juice processing plant and Auburndale yard.
Quote from: adamh0903 on April 22, 2008, 02:29:11 PM
The last trains rolled through Callahan in the early/mid 80's on the old FL RR line. The old timers around here say they called that line, "the peggy". since that time business along the rail bed rented the property from FL RR and then CSX for business parking and other uses, about 8 months ago, most businesses got a letter from CSX about stating CSX no longer owned the property and businesses could no longer lease it. After extensive land and title searches we found out that CSX DOES own the property.
So if CSX does own the property, then this must certainly be the rail line they are talking about relaying. It would be difficult to imagine the spending additional millions on assembling the large amount of ROW needed for a new path.
exactly, this is what a few of us was talking about this morning.
Is it any wonder CSX makes a profit even when everybody else struggles. Jacksonville is lucky to have them. I hope they want the commuter rail deal here like they seem to in Orlando.
QuoteThe image I posted shows today's operational rail lines and the companies that own them. The Wildwood-Auburndale line was pulled up over 20 years ago. Today, its the Gen. Van Fleet Trail.
If that corridor hasn't been built on yet that may be a viable option for a Lakeland bypass.
It floors me how much of our rail has been ripped up.
Its just as rural as it was the day they pulled the tracks up. Its a no brainer, but its also expensive.
Find in "PURPLE" (what else) some abandoned lines that IF rebuilt, would fix Jacksonville, Lakeland, Tampa and Orlandos railroad problems. You'll recall I posted a connection from Blount Island around the Airport to the CSX about a month or two ago. Some of this is pretty basic, but FDOT has ignored this and allowed these traps to grow beyond management size.
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa111/Ocklawaha/CRITICAL%20Maps/florida-rail-maprebuilt.jpg)
Ocklawaha
I live about 100 yards from the old rail bed, so after looking at it last night, I am not sure there is enough room to make a turn north to tie into the existing tracks to waycross. The old Fl RR line only ran south/east. With the exisiting property near the tracks, Im not sure there is room to take freight north.
In these pictures, the blue lines are the exsiting CSX line to waycross the green line was the old FL RR line and the red boxes are exsisting property that is being used near the sight.
(http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff230/adamh0903/rraerial.jpg)
(http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff230/adamh0903/rrtracksbirdeye.jpg)
It was mentioned that they expected to pay as much as $6 million in ROW costs. Maybe its for a few properties, such as this. A similar situation exists where the port spur meets the existing line paralleling Main Street.
I wouldn't be too concerned with trains headed to Waycross. As these containers come off the port they won't be in any type of delivery sequence. The trick will be to get them to the nearest yard to break down and make up blocks of cars (trains) for distant points. As the newest and hottest railroad property in town is the Dinsmore Cut-off and the new intermodal yard west of I-295 my guess is THAT is where this stuff is headed. Besides Dinsmore some may trickle down to Baldwin or over to Moncrief. The good thing is CSX is doing something to move them out and away from downtown and the "S". The bad news is we still won't have universal access to our all important port facility. One wonders if CSX would be open to a CSX-NS-CITY-STATE partnership. It would take very little to hang a connection from the Dinsmore Cut-off to the NS mainline and their Simpson Yard intermodal facility (which was also recently expanded).
Ocklawaha
Quotewouldn't be too concerned with trains headed to Waycross. As these containers come off the port they won't be in any type of delivery sequence. The trick will be to get them to the nearest yard to break down and make up blocks of cars (trains) for distant points. As the newest and hottest railroad property in town is the Dinsmore Cut-off and the new intermodal yard west of I-295 my guess is THAT is where this stuff is headed.
Containers will be broken down and blocked at the port's proposed rail intermodal yard.
QuoteThe good thing is CSX is doing something to move them out and away from downtown and the "S". The bad news is we still won't have universal access to our all important port facility. One wonders if CSX would be open to a CSX-NS-CITY-STATE partnership.
One of CSX's reasons for doing this (the new line) is to establish a monopoly on rail based future port business. This would go against them agreeing to give universal access to all port facilities.
The picture in Tuesdays edition of the TU, showed a proposed connection sight near Hilliard. I dont believe there was ever a railway from yulee to hilliard, so one would have to be built.
Quote from: Ocklawaha on April 23, 2008, 10:15:28 AM
Find in "PURPLE" (what else) some abandoned lines that IF rebuilt, would fix Jacksonville, Lakeland, Tampa and Orlandos railroad problems. You'll recall I posted a connection from Blount Island around the Airport to the CSX about a month or two ago. Some of this is pretty basic, but FDOT has ignored this and allowed these traps to grow beyond management size.
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa111/Ocklawaha/CRITICAL%20Maps/florida-rail-maprebuilt.jpg)
Ocklawaha
Does CSX still own those abandoned corridors? If so the costs of new track may not be as much as we think.
No. CSX does not own all of these abandoned corridors. For example, they don't own all the ROW from Wildwood to Auburndale anymore and the link from Leesburg to Orlando has developed into a suburban commercial corridor resembling Southside Blvd.
well i give it 2 mounths before this idea dies .....face it....ur beatin a dead horse
Here's the scoop, most of the miles here are now owned as Right-of-way by the State of Florida. The only congested portion of the "Southside Blvd like" Tavares-Leesburg segment still has some 90% of the right of way intact. In fact within Leesburg, it still had rails in spots until about 10 years ago. This line didn't follow the BLVD. but went into Leesburg, swung south of the Airport and only came up to the Blvd to cross the Canal then followed the wide road past the Tavares Court House where the Florida Central tracks are today.
I've driven it several times and am confident that for the Millions they are pouring into the "deal" they could just cross that canal behind the airport somewhere and make that link. A great deal of the lines in the west and central portion are as Lake said, rural as the day Ponce De Leon hit the beach.
Ocklawaha
CSX still owns the entire right of way through callahan. We just went through a long legal process to find that out.
If like the TU said they are bent on moving the traffic to Waycross then the statement that some sort of Terminal Intermodal yard will sort the trains is bunk. Waycross has the multi-million dollar "Jacksonville" yard including a hump facility (which won't fly for container or well cars... Thus the little sticker on their sides that reads "DO NOT HUMP") But they could flat switch these in Waycross and bypass the hump (hill). My guess since Lake said there was an image of a line to Hilliard is they'll use 90% of the old FLRR route then just in the edge of Callahan slice NW to meet the mainline pointed toward Hilliard.
(http://www.uncanny.net/~wetzel/freightneardolores.JPG)
Headed to Long Beach, and YES I did ride this line on the Interurban!
(http://www.railroadpix.com/images/freight/fre_img_18/Alameda-south.jpg)
The same basic area today!
Meanwhile re-re-re-reading the stuff, the door still seems open for a down the road Jax-Port buyout of the lines from I-295 and Main, southward to Springfield. CSX didn't deny 36 hours to get cars from the island to Moncrief as both the curse and the blessing of railroading is consolidation of the loads. Not enough, and they'll sit until it makes sense to move them. But that blade cuts both ways, for example, consigned to FEC or NS and maybe it will take 45 hours to get downtown! We NEED universal access and we are going to need it sooner not later. If the authority is smart and they go ahead with an intermodal make up facility, they'll own it lock-stock and barrel, and it will be designed to somehow tie into the old Trout river bridge and access for EVERY carrier. Just look what the port of Los Angeles or Long Beach did with the Alameda Corridor! (err uh, a former INTERURBAN railway for the most part).
Ocklawaha