Metro Jacksonville

Jacksonville by Neighborhood => Downtown => Topic started by: Metro Jacksonville on September 03, 2013, 03:12:00 AM

Title: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Metro Jacksonville on September 03, 2013, 03:12:00 AM
Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101

(http://photos.metrojacksonville.com/photos/2739579414_bJc79QD-M.jpg)

For those that want to be a part of the planning process for the future of Downtown Jacksonville, 2013 presents great opportunity. Before the Downtown Investment Authority (DIA) can help significantly advance the revitalization dreams everyone desires, a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) plan must be developed and the effort is now underway.

Full Article
http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2013-sep-downtown-investment-authoritys-cra-plan-101
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on September 03, 2013, 03:41:44 AM
This is HUGE. The opportunity to immediately show and tell Governor Scott and the Commissioners of FIND that Jacksonville is not totally LOST.
I'm All In.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on September 03, 2013, 04:19:10 AM
DIA  meeting today at 3pm city hall. Anyone going?
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: sheclown on September 03, 2013, 07:44:31 AM
Let's be careful about "removing slum and blight" .   I think we have "removed" enough.  How about "changing the blight".  Or "making the blight, right."

Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: floridatrop on September 03, 2013, 10:46:28 AM
The terms "slum" and "blight" were used by the Federal government as early as the 1940s in the first urban renewal programs and then picked up by state and local governments.  The terms are contained in Florida's community redevelopment act and should be changed, particularly the term slum.  It is misleading and causes property owners to resist the designation of redevelopment areas.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Charles Hunter on September 03, 2013, 03:54:53 PM
So we know what we are talking about, here are the definitions of "slum" and "blighted area" from Chapter 163
Quote(7) "Slum area" means an area having physical or economic conditions conducive to disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, poverty, or crime because there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which are impaired by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence, and exhibiting one or more of the following factors:
(a) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces;
(b) High density of population, compared to the population density of adjacent areas within the county or municipality; and overcrowding, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies and the requirements of the Florida Building Code; or
(c) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes.
( 8 ) "Blighted area" means an area in which there are a substantial number of deteriorated, or deteriorating structures, in which conditions, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies, are leading to economic distress or endanger life or property, and in which two or more of the following factors are present:
(a) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities;
(b) Aggregate assessed values of real property in the area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the 5 years prior to the finding of such conditions;
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness;
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements;
(f) Inadequate and outdated building density patterns;
(g) Falling lease rates per square foot of office, commercial, or industrial space compared to the remainder of the county or municipality;
(h) Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land;
(i) Residential and commercial vacancy rates higher in the area than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(j) Incidence of crime in the area higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(k) Fire and emergency medical service calls to the area proportionately higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(l) A greater number of violations of the Florida Building Code in the area than the number of violations recorded in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(m) Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or
(n) Governmentally owned property with adverse environmental conditions caused by a public or private entity.

It seems downtown might meet some of the criteria for "blighted"
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: thelakelander on September 03, 2013, 04:27:26 PM
Kind of seems like every neighborhood in the city's urban core meets at least one of those criteria....

Quote(b) High density of population, compared to the population density of adjacent areas within the county or municipality;

High density equals slum and blight?  It may be time re-evaluate the definitions again.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: icarus on September 03, 2013, 04:47:02 PM
I wouldn't think it would be hard to get the CRA as most of Downtown, the Southbank (to Emerson) and most if not all of Springfield is already a HUD Empowerment zone.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: thelakelander on September 03, 2013, 04:54:29 PM
Downtown is already a CRA. Our +30 year old CRA plan just needs to be updated.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: icarus on September 03, 2013, 07:11:21 PM
My bad but I guess CRA Plan "101" is an appropriate title as we haven't gotten it right in 30 years. lol
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: dougskiles on September 03, 2013, 09:12:50 PM
Jacksonville Beach has two CRAs that have led to significant infrastructure improvements and redevelopment.  Their CRA is managed primarily by their planning director, Steve Lindorff.  Great guy.

I hope Mr. Wallace takes the time to get to know Steve.  He would be a great resource.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: simms3 on September 04, 2013, 12:11:14 AM
Quote from: Charles Hunter on September 03, 2013, 03:54:53 PM
So we know what we are talking about, here are the definitions of "slum" and "blighted area" from Chapter 163
Quote(7) "Slum area" means an area having physical or economic conditions conducive to disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, poverty, or crime because there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether residential or nonresidential, which are impaired by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age, or obsolescence, and exhibiting one or more of the following factors:
(a) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces;
(b) High density of population, compared to the population density of adjacent areas within the county or municipality; and overcrowding, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies and the requirements of the Florida Building Code; or
(c) The existence of conditions that endanger life or property by fire or other causes.
( 8 ) "Blighted area" means an area in which there are a substantial number of deteriorated, or deteriorating structures, in which conditions, as indicated by government-maintained statistics or other studies, are leading to economic distress or endanger life or property, and in which two or more of the following factors are present:
(a) Predominance of defective or inadequate street layout, parking facilities, roadways, bridges, or public transportation facilities;
(b) Aggregate assessed values of real property in the area for ad valorem tax purposes have failed to show any appreciable increase over the 5 years prior to the finding of such conditions;
(c) Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness;
(d) Unsanitary or unsafe conditions;
(e) Deterioration of site or other improvements;
(f) Inadequate and outdated building density patterns;
(g) Falling lease rates per square foot of office, commercial, or industrial space compared to the remainder of the county or municipality;
(h) Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land;
(i) Residential and commercial vacancy rates higher in the area than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(j) Incidence of crime in the area higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(k) Fire and emergency medical service calls to the area proportionately higher than in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(l) A greater number of violations of the Florida Building Code in the area than the number of violations recorded in the remainder of the county or municipality;
(m) Diversity of ownership or defective or unusual conditions of title which prevent the free alienability of land within the deteriorated or hazardous area; or
(n) Governmentally owned property with adverse environmental conditions caused by a public or private entity.

It seems downtown might meet some of the criteria for "blighted"

Going back to Raleigh, one of my biggest turnoffs (and to Charlotte as well) is that they are too clean and new.  I like old and gritty so long as that doesn't mean "blighted" in the traditional sense.

For instance, if it were up to me, my creative spirit would incorporate plants growing out of the sides/brick facades of the Laura Trio in an homage to its current "blighted" conditions, but I would massage that design element to appear to have the right mixture of spontaneity and control/organization so that it sets the right atmospheric blend of funky cool and old/gritty. 

I hate what they did to Laura St...looks like a new, clean, sterile, boring suburban street with a faux suburban cobblestone turnaround.  Leave some of the old shit and just rehab the buildings to be habitable and desirable to a mix of uses!  How hard is it?  Clearly too.

My favorite block is the one that contains the FL Theater.  It's one of the only cool blocks left in the entire city.  If they go the purely "new" and clean route, the city is lost and dead.  It can't make new and clean desirable like Charlotte can...it doesn't have the other ingredients that Charlotte has that make that acceptable.  It needs to keep its old and its charm and go the Nashville/Milwaukee route.  People are over complicating this.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on September 08, 2013, 06:59:49 AM
Quote from: dougskiles on September 03, 2013, 09:12:50 PM
Jacksonville Beach has two CRAs that have led to significant infrastructure improvements and redevelopment.  Their CRA is managed primarily by their planning director, Steve Lindorff.  Great guy.

I hope Mr. Wallace takes the time to get to know Steve.  He would be a great resource.

I would include George Forbes as well. Infrastructure improvements is key.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on October 09, 2013, 05:43:21 AM
Are there any DIA meetings today? Anyone.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on January 11, 2014, 05:57:30 AM
Next DIA Board meeting just 5 days out. What will be the prioritized CRA/DIA Waterway projects in our new DIA zone from the Fuller Warren Bridge to the Mathews Bridge? Anyone.
Title: Re: Downtown Investment Authority's CRA Plan 101
Post by: Noone on January 23, 2014, 05:45:29 PM
Today at the great meeting of the LOST which was the 1/23/14 FIND subcommittee meeting of the Jacksonville Waterways Commission that was compiling its 2014 FIND grant application list it was disclosed that Public Access and Economic opportunity does not exist on our Downtown Waterways.

Will Mayor Brown change this? Will the CRA change this? The Civic council? the Chamber? The DIA? The Jacksonville city council? Vision 2025?