Quote
Deflecting Killer Asteroid Could Be Geopolitical Nightmare
by Mike Wall, SPACE.com Senior Writer
Date: 14 March 2013 Time: 03:36 PM ET
Humanity has the technical know-how to deflect a killer asteroid away from Earth, but whether the world can come together to pull it off in time is another matter.
A looming asteroid strike would be a global problem demanding a complex and coordinated response, experts say. Not only would nations need to set aside their differences and work together, but some would have to put their citizens at increased risk for the good of the planet, agreeing to allow the space rock to be steered in their direction from the predicted impact site.
"There are a million geopolitical questions that are really, really, really tough," said Rusty Schweickart, co-founder and chairman emeritus of the B612 Foundation, a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping protect Earth from asteroid strikes.
"We're going to solve the technology," added Schweickart, who was the lunar module pilot on NASA's Apollo 9 mission in 1969. "But to get a geopolitical decision made in a timely way, and not just debate all the way down until it's too late to act, is going to be a real challenge."
A cosmic shooting gallery
Earth zooms around the sun in a cosmic shooting gallery, sharing space with millions of asteroids that slam into us from time to time.
The events of Feb. 15 provide a stark reminder of this ever-present danger. On that day, a 55-foot-wide (17 meters) space rock exploded without warning over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk, damaging thousands of buildings and wounding 1,200 people. Hours later, the 130-foot asteroid 2012 DA14 missed Earth by just 17,200 miles (27,700 kilometers), coming closer than the planet's ring of geosynchronous satellites
While astronomers have spotted 95 percent of the 980 near-Earth asteroids at least 0.6 miles (1 km) wide, which might end civilization if they hit us, many smaller but still hazardous space rocks remain undetected.
Researchers have discovered less than 30 percent of the close-flying 330-foot-wide (100 m) objects, for example, which could destroy an area the size of a state if they hit us. And they've mapped out the orbits of less than 1 percent of the 130-footers thought to be out there, which could wipe out a city.
In all, just 9,700 near-Earth asteroids have been catalogued to date, out of a population numbering in the millions. Many astronomers and politicians are thus calling for more resources to be put toward asteroid-detection efforts, so that we have a better idea of what's headed our way in the future.
Something big will hit us again, experts say, and we'll probably need years or decades of warning to do something about it.
How to deflect an asteroid
Scientists think they know ow to how to deflect an asteroid headed directly for Earth, given enough lead time.
The strategy involves mounting at least two coordinated space missions, Schweickart said. The first would slam a kinetic impactor into the asteroid to knock it off course. The second would launch a "gravity tractor" probe to fly alongside the space rock, nudging it farther via a tiny but persistent gravitational tug.
"You always need a gravity tractor there to ensure that any deflection does not end up having the asteroid go through a [gravitational] 'keyhole,' which would simply bring it back later," Schweickart told SPACE.com.
This approach can avert more than 98 percent of projected collisions, according to a 2008 report called "Asteroid Threats: A Call for Global Response." The report was put together by the Association of Space Explorers' International Panel on Asteroid Threat Mitigation, which Schweickart chaired. [Photos: Asteroids in Deep Space]
A different strategy â€" such as a nuclear blast â€" may be needed for asteroids more than 1,300 feet (400 m) wide, or for those detected with little warning time, the report adds. But such dire cases are likely to come along just once every 100,000 years or so.
Political hurdles
Humanity has successfully demonstrated both aspects of the impactor-tractor technique. In 2005, for example, NASA smashed a probe into the Comet Tempel 1 to investigate the icy body's composition. And several spacecraft, such as NASA's Dawn probe and Japan's Hayabusa craft, have rendezvoused with asteroids in deep space.
But the main challenges of an asteroid-deflection mission will probably be more political than technical, Schweickart said. And perhaps the biggest hurdle of all will be getting the world to agree which way to steer the asteroid.
Each incoming asteroid whose orbit has been mapped will threaten Earth along a specific "risk corridor" â€" a line of potential impact sites that extends about 180 degrees across the planet's surface but is just a few tens of kilometers wide.
A deflection campaign would not be able to make huge changes to the dangerous asteroid's orbit. Rather, it could merely drag the projected impact point along the risk corridor to the left or to the right, by slowing the space rock down or speeding it up slightly.
The goal, of course, would be to drag the impact site off the planet entirely. But determining how exactly to achieve this â€" to go left or right, to push the asteroid or to pull it â€" would be difficult, for any decision would necessarily put some nations at greater risk than others, Schweickart said.
"If you start a deflection and something goes wrong, you have now shifted that impact point along the risk corridor one way or the other," Schweickart said. "And now people are in danger who were not in danger before you started this operation."
And that's just one of many tricky geopolitical issues a potential asteroid-deflection mission would present, he added.
"Who does it? Who pays for it? Who handles the liability?" Schweickart said. "How does the decision get made? Do we deflect the 40-meter object, or do we evacuate? Who makes that decision? And who pays for the evacuation? Everybody, because we all collectively made the decision? Or do the people who were unlucky enough to evacuate have to handle the cost?"
Getting the ball rolling
Schweickart and many of his colleagues think it's imperative to develop an international framework for dealing with the asteroid threat, so that the world can work together to predict and prevent catastrophic impacts.
The Association of Space Explorers (ASE) â€" a group of veteran astronauts and cosmonauts â€" lays out a proposed framework in its 2008 report, calling for the United Nations to oversee a three-tiered program consisting of 1) an international asteroid detection and warning network; 2) a mission-planning group that would assess deflection options; and 3) a mission-authorization body tasked with developing "the policies and guidelines that represent the international will to respond to the global impact hazard."
The United Nations' Action Team on Near-Earth Objects â€" better known as Action Team 14 â€" embraced much of this plan in a set of recommendations it drew up late last year. These recommendations are likely to be adopted by the U.N.'s Working Group on Near-Earth Objects, then go up the chain from there, ASE officials said.
"Given the work methods of the [UN's] Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, the recommendations of the Working Group will likely be adopted by the Committee in June," ASE officials wrote in a Feb. 27 update. "The [UN] General Assembly will likely follow suit in October without further discussions."
The U.N.'s ponderous pace and many layers of bureaucracy may be frustrating to scientists who have been working the technical side of the hazardous-asteroid problem for years. But Schweickart voiced optimism that the political progress made will eventually be worth the wait.
"When you get there, the whole world has bought into it," he said. "I mean, you're moving the whole world."
http://www.livescience.com/27911-killer-asteroid-deflection-challenges-politics.html
Good article. It may take some unilateral action if something seriously threatening were to be predicted.
On another note as the current caretakers of Humanity this generation should start teraforming Mars. It likely won't benefit the current population but given how few inhabitable planets we have spotted in our observations it is crazy to waste the fact that there is another one right beside us.
It looks like we will soon see a world space agency that would be a collective of all countries interested that would pay into the pot for things like space exploration and asteroid protection. Just imagine what this planet could to with a singular directive and mission.
http://earthsky.org/earth/nasa-on-asteroid-defense-if-its-coming-in-three-weeks-pray
QuoteNASA on asteroid defense: If it’s coming in three weeks, pray
On February 15, a small asteroid exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia, generating shock waves that shattered windows and injured some 1,500 people. On that same day, asteroid 2012 DA14 made a close pass by Earth, at a scant 17,200 miles (27,700 km) from our world’s surface, closer than some communication satellites. In response to these events, the U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology Committee met in a hearing on March 19, 2013. The hearing was titled Threats from Space: A Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and Mitigate Asteroids and Meteors. Scientists and lawmakers discussed the risk of, and defense strategy for, an unforeseen asteroid or meteor on collision course with Earth. While trying to emphasize the need for adequate funding for detecting and characterizing near-Earth objects, and diverting them if necessary, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said:
From the information we have, we don’t know of an asteroid that will threaten the population of the United States. But if it’s coming in three weeks…pray.
In other words, unless we know in advance that an asteroid is coming â€" and therefore have time to divert it â€" there is little we could do about an asteroid on a collision course with Earth. Bolden added:
The reason I can’t do anything in the next three weeks is because for decades we have put it off.
NASA is currently tracking about 95 percent of Near Earth Objects (NEOs) that are .62 miles (nearly 1,000 meters) or larger in diameter. White House Science Advisor John Holdren told legislators that:
… an asteroid of that size, a kilometer or bigger, could plausibly end civilization.
So far, none of the objects NASA is tracking appear to be an immediate threat. However, as Chairman Smith pointed out:
The meteor that struck Russia was estimated to be 17 meters and wasn’t tracked at all. The smaller they are, the harder they are to spot, and yet they can be life-threatening. Some space challenges require innovation, commitment and diligence. This is one of them.
A small asteroid â€" like the one that exploded over Russia on February 15 â€" would not be world destroying. But clearly objects smaller than .62 miles (1,000 meters) have the potential to cause damage.
Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) said the events on February 15:
… serve as evidence that we live in an active solar system with potentially hazardous objects passing through our neighborhood with surprising frequency.
John Holdren said the best way to detect objects that might be on a collision course with Earth would be to put an infrared-sensing telescope in a Venus-like orbit. Holdren estimated the cost of such a telescope to be between $500 million and $750 million. Another costly and time-intensive undertaking would be mounting a mission to divert a threatening object after detection. NASA’s hunt for threatening asteroids will be affected by federal sequestration cuts, and at present funding levels NASA estimates it will take nearly 20 years to identify all potentially threatening Near Earth Objects.
One solution that all lawmakers seemed amenable to was crowdsourcing, that is, working with other countries and amateur astronomers to crowdsource the hunt for threatening asteroids. Holdren said:
The odds of a Near-Earth Object strike causing massive casualties and destruction of infrastructure are very small, but the potential consequences of such an event are so large it makes sense to take the risk seriously.
Bottom line: On March 19, 2013, the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee met in a hearing titled Threats from Space: A Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and Mitigate Asteroids and Meteors. Legislators, NASA administrators and others discussed the need for adequate funding for detecting and characterizing near-Earth objects, and diverting them if necessary.
(http://en.es-static.us/upl/2013/02/relative_positions_asteroid_near_Earth_Scott_Manly_Armagh-Observatory_2-13-2013.png)
QuoteAll asteroids within a third of Earth’s distance from the sun in mid-February, 2013 are shown, with Earth at the center, in pseudo 3D. The red oval around Earth represents a distance 10 times greater than the moon’s distance.
Quote from: Jason on March 18, 2013, 09:21:20 AM
It looks like we will soon see a world space agency that would be a collective of all countries interested that would pay into the pot for things like space exploration and asteroid protection. Just imagine what this planet could to with a singular directive and mission.
Jason Vigo, you mean like the Federation?