Quote• JTA is holding an invite-only workshop Thursday during which there will be presentations on Better Jacksonville Plan/JTA projects, the proposed Bus Rapid Transit/System Redesign, the Jacksonville Regional Transportation Center and JTA’s feasibility studies on commuter rail and water borne transportation. Lunch and an afternoon bus tour of JTA Better Jax projects follows the morning presentations.
http://www.jaxdailyrecord.com/showstory.php?Story_id=47756
Depending on who's invited, this sounds like a good way to push across an opinion, to non-transit oriented leaders, without the fear of being exposed by educated opposing viewpoints.
I wonder whose going to be invited to these?
I guess they are tired of all the public input. I am shocked metrojacksonville wasn't invited!
Quote from: chrissy on June 12, 2007, 10:30:12 AM
I wonder whose going to be invited to these?
I'd suspect key city leaders and officials who, in reality, aren't well versed about mass transit and it's impact on the urban environment.
Quote from: Lunican on June 12, 2007, 10:40:55 AM
I guess they are tired of all the public input. I am shocked metrojacksonville wasn't invited!
Yeah, it's not like the public will be riding this thing anyway. We're going to fill those empty seats with JTA employees and city officials from the 4th floor, lol.
Let's try to crash the workshop?
I would love to, but I'll be in Toronto on the 14th. I won't get back to town, until the 18th.
It is a workshop for all the new incoming City Council members. It is simply to introduce them to all the projects currently going on in Jacksonville (transit and highway) I have prepared several slides for the commuter rail and waterborne study to present to them. It is not strictly a BRT meeting per se.
Doesn't the law require a meeting involving city council members discussing public projects to be posted and open to the public?
I am not even invited. I don't really think it is closed to anyone, just that these people have been specifically invited. They are not officially City Council members yet. So, I don't know how the sunshine laws apply to that situation.
How does the Bungled Rapid Transit or BRT stack up? Here's another report, used WITH permission of Light Rail Now, Austin, Texas. Hope you find it useful in the fight!
Ocklawaha
New-Look "Bus Rapid Transit" Buses vs. Light Rail Vehicles: A Personal Evaluation
Commentary by Darrell Clarke • August 2005
Darrell Clarke is co-chairman of the Los Angeles-area Friends 4 Expo Transit organization, a transit advocacy group (and an underwriter of the Light Rail Now Project) which helped generate public and official support for the Exposition Blvd. light rail transit project, now under way.
"Bus Rapid Transit" buses, with a sleek, streamlined look, and with more exotic propulsion systems, such as hybrid diesel-electric or gas-electric drives, are frequently being compared favorably to light rail cars, even being described as "train-like" and "light rail on rubber tires". But how do the "new look" buses actually stack up?
I can personally speak to the new Los Angeles articulated buses from NABI (North American Bus Industries), about to be operated on the new "Orange Line" busway of the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) in the San Fernando Valley. One of these NABI buses was used as a backdrop for an MTA Earth Day press event this past spring, which I attended.
Basically the NABI "BRT" bus for the "Orange Line" (see photo) is a 60-foot articulated version of their regular 40-foot low-floor CNG bus, with some rounded decorative trim. NABI representatives say it is quieter â€" and perhaps it is a little â€" but there's still typical bus engine noise and vibration. It has a low floor except the rear of the trailer, with a slight floor hump over the articulation joint.
Santa Monica Big Blue Bus has a batch of new 40-foot low-floor New Flyer LNG buses. Riding them and their earlier New Flyer low-floor diesels, I find that the newer ones have less noise and vibration, but no one would confuse one with an electric vehicle.
Santa Monica has not rushed to embrace hybrids. According to a Big Blue Bus representative, the agency has invested in LNG infrastructure for air quality, and there aren't LNG-fueled hybrids available. In regard to a comparison of CNG vs. diesel, the latest Santa Monica LNG New Flyers are slightly quieter and smoother, but more similar than different compared with older ones.
The first time I experienced hybrid (combustion engine + electric) buses was at the 2000 Rail~Volution in Denver. Their new composite-bodied downtown pedestrian mall buses with electric drive and a small engine were much smoother and quieter than conventional motor buses ~ basically the experience of an electric trolley bus.
Interior of a Denver Transit Mall hybrid bus. Crowding is frequently a problem on even the most advanced buses because of limited interior space.
The Long Beach, California transit agency is acquiring a number of hybrid buses. Recently I visited Long Beach to evaluate some of these new 40-foot hybrids, and found a number of them on the downtown transit mall next to the Blue Line light rail transit terminus. (A short sound video of one of these, playable with Windows Media Player, is available online. For download instructions, see:
http://www.friends4expo.org/hybridbus.htm.)
My subjective take was that these buses produce more of a whine sound, with a little engine rumble on acceleration. It's definitely not silent (or as quiet as my Prius), but rather less noisy than a conventional diesel or CNG/LNG bus. Unfortunately, it was not a convenient opportunity to take a ride on one.
On the basis of these personal experiences, plus what I know of technical developments and experiences elsewhere, I think there is a role for hybrid buses to quickly provide upgraded service on existing boulevards. But I believe they will remain inferior to light rail in a number of respects:
• Smooth ride on rails vs. uneven pavement for bus;
• Speed through intersections, where a single long train can be given pre-emption with signals or gates, but multiple buses could not do so without obstructing cross-traffic;
• Faster acceleration of electric rail compared with motor or hybrid buses;
• Greater rail transit appeal to drivers who have nice cars as their alternative.
Los Angeles County MTA Gold Line light rail train runs through South Pasadena.
Light Rail Now! website
Updated 2005/08/09
Quote from: fsujax on June 12, 2007, 02:40:23 PM
It is a workshop for all the new incoming City Council members. It is simply to introduce them to all the projects currently going on in Jacksonville (transit and highway) I have prepared several slides for the commuter rail and waterborne study to present to them. It is not strictly a BRT meeting per se.
Unfortunately, some of the things these council members will be hearing will be flat out lies and assumptions based on faulty data. I guess, it will be up to us to continue to hold JTA's feet to the fire, by meeting with these officials ourselves.
(http://www.funnyhub.com/pictures/img/really-dead-end.jpg)
Just like the Skyway, I promise you this is
where BRT will end up when the FACTS come out.
How sad that these slanted half truths will posion rail transit in this city for another 50 years. Even worse, today in Mass Transit Magazine online, came the announcement that Oklahoma City, population 1,000,000 in the metro area, density 38 per sq mi, and covering 750 sq miles, has announced LRT or Modern Streetcar is coming. Our forward thinkers over on Myrtle are about to be left in the red dust by Cowboys and Indians! Damn JTA and the Dog they rode in on anyway!
Ocklawaha
I'm not sure this BRT thing is going to come to a dead end.
There seem to be a lot of people invested in making it happen, no matter how wrong it is.
Yeah but their timeline is 30 years, so all those people will be dead before it's done.
If things remain the same, once they spend the $100 million BJP money on unneccessary ROW and the first phase turns out to be a failure, the rest will probably never happen because the federal government won't fund it (aka. the skyway). If this happens, it will be too bad, because the concept of bus rapid transit, when used properly, can improve the overall quality of a regional mass transit network.