So, it seems, that a house can be removed from the formal track. It was done in 2009.
(http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/ab165/sheclown/2012-01-28-2202-57.jpg)
starting on line 15 of page 59
(http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/ab165/sheclown/2012-01-28-2141-15-1.jpg)
All one needs to do as a commission is to:
1.) motion to reconsider
2.) second and vote to reconsider
3.) motion to remove from the formal track
4.) second and a vote to remove from the formal track
I feel a bit like Dorothy...we had the power to do this all along?
No, there is NO FORMAL TRACK, haven't you heard? LMFAO...
To view the larger discussion of formal track in this meeting go here:
http://forum.preservationsos.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=861&p=9142#p9142
(http://i860.photobucket.com/albums/ab165/sheclown/hpc%20%20meeting%2062409/2012-01-29-0816-12.jpg)
Ironically, these are not pulled off the formal track because they are Nationally Recognized Historic properties, or valuable to the community, or because the commissioners are charged with protecting the historic fabric of this city...
it is pulled off of the formal track so that the homeowners can pull a COA for demolition which is cheaper than having the city do it...
Seriously.. is there not something more important these people could be doing ,instead of targeting structures for "formal tracking" ..
good grief
This needs to be on the front cover of Folio Weekly...
I can get in touch with the folks at Folio Weekly.
-Josh
Quote from: wsansewjs on February 02, 2012, 05:05:03 PM
This needs to be on the front cover of Folio Weekly...
I can get in touch with the folks at Folio Weekly.
-Josh
Works for me , Josh!